quote:
Originally posted by kimota:
I think hms have always tried to stay just within the rules by saying 'this one is annoying me and that one too' , maybe a day or two before noms, to let others know which way they will be voting . I don't mind this and usually like minded hms will agree on at least one person to nominate anyway, but some always ovestep the mark and whisper under covers or have transparent 'codes' leg. Luke's (BB9) 'All we need is chickpea and Happy house'
I think this year they all dislike Freddie and don't need to cheat to know that they will be nomming him. Angel made herself the clear target last week, over her part in 'drinkgate' and being caught taking other peoples things. If they go on to nominate exactly the same people week after week then they are being stupid as it will be obvious that they are conspiring in some way. I hope they do and are punished by all being put up!
I agree with that. The thing is if you tell someone who you are annoyed with then it's clear that you'll choose that person for nomination.
BB can't come down on everyone saying who is bugging them because as time goes by in the house the only people you speak to are your fellow housemates so they will increasingly talk about one another as the house becomes everything (if you know what I mean). It would be an impossible task for BB to stop them from discussing each other and letting off steam about who is bugging them.
I think this is why it's hard for BB to actively punish the house for discussing who annoys them.
You'll also notice that Freddie has been trying to influence who others might vote for too. His problem is that he doens't have enough social clout in there to affect their strategies. Unless it's only colluding if it's your least favourite housemates doing it?