Har har! well injuctions don't work..apart from denying the tabloids their lurid headlines,,,good.. because they are right wing bastards anyway!

At times like this one realises that Rooney is a brave guy. No pandering to the scratter papers for him. He faced it head on........... Sort of! I doubt the people mentioned in this thread have done anything wrong, but the footballer mentioned, in that unlikely extra marital event, would probably have killed for that sort of publicity. Otherwise he has to be one of the most boring, charismatic free, players to grace the hallowed turf. Football skills aside of course. Likewise the actor. I wonder how many of my fellow FMs haven't at some time had a bordel related accident. One might have slipped or indeed fallen on a device of some sort.

I am glad it's got out who Imogen had the affair with.  Why the hell should he be allowed to remain anonymous, when she can't?  She may be a brainless gullible bimbo, but he is far worse than her IMO.  He has the wife and kids, not her.  But when a woman has an affair with a married man, it is always the woman who gets painted the slut/whore/harlot/slapper/tramp who tried to 'steal' someone's man.  Lots of people (usually women, and particularly the man's wife,) believe that the man was led astray and the mistress is largely to blame... and as I said she gets the rough end of the stick.  Like most mistresses; Imogen believed the married man's bullshit he spouted, in order to get her into bed. 

 

At the end of the day, men who have affairs are just out for a bit of fun and a fumble, and the woman he is having the affair with, is almost always out for a relationship...and you can guarantee that it will always end in tears... usually the wife's and mistresse's tears, and rarely the man's, as most wives are daft enough to have him back...and he ends up relatively unscathed....  It's the wife and mistress who have the broken hearts; not him.  The marriage is never the same again though.

Agreed...i disagree with her having to take all the flak on her own, it takes two as you have said, BUT....she knew he was Married and should've stayed away.....they're both in the wrong and i feel no pity for her at all wanting to be a home-wrecker/ gold digger....they're both as bad as each other....I have no symapathy for either of them...the truth will out eventually.

Is Giggsy's misses sticking by him, does anyone know?

Search me, I didn't even know he was married!

You are Imogen and I claim my super injunction fiver

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1232.html

 

The Claimant's witness statement was to the effect that Ms Thomas had made contact with him by various text messages in March, which led him to conclude that she was at that stage thinking of selling her story, such as it was.

She told him by this means that she wanted, or "needed", a payment from him of £50,000.

It now seems that the Claimant may well have been "set up" so that photographs could be taken of Ms Thomas going to one or other, or both, of the hotels.

Although the position is not yet by any means clear, the evidence before me on 14 April appeared to suggest that Ms Thomas had arranged the hotel rendezvous in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists.

Imogen was after the cash,no surprise.

erinp  Member

Today at 3:56 PM

Weak man went tho.........

I'll use this one then ........... Thank Bog that no-one on here mentioned the footballer concerned. I see that they are after Twitter with the intent of prosecution. Even though it is predicted that he will be named in parliament this week. Meanwhile..... Did anyone understand the logic behind that LibDem gobshieght grassing up Freddie the Shreddie? Why was it in the public interest? He seemed to be suggesting that the long predicted collapse of western capitalism was down to one bloke and his paramour!

There is now a thread with a footballer's name on it, but the initials given in the article are not of the footballer mentioned in the other thread.

they don't use their proper initials...when john terry had his super injunction it refered to him by different initials

That makes it beside the point surely?

 

Judge: You must not stalk/bother PML

 

Accused: That's OK It's RG I'm after anyway.