- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
gawd! who that's pompous twonk sat next to her?
When will these silly tarts ever learn Always go for the footballers... they don't give a crap about them. As Sophie Reade found out when she set her eyes on Mario Balotelli.
She thought he would propose!!
I feel so sorry for his wife and young family.
On a serious point, this "rich man's gagging order" makes a mockery of free speech.
I can appreciate that the rich and powerful don't want the press trawling through their private lives, going through their dustbins and tapping their phones because of who they are. That's fair enough but I don't think it's right that Imogen's private life can be splashed all over the press while this so-called 'family man' footballer's private life is protected by these gagging orders that only the very rich can afford, and no one's allowed to even mention it.
Today it was pointed out while journalist, Andrew Marr had his super injunction in place, he was questioning Gordon Brown on malicious press speculation about his use of prescription pain killers.
agreed carnellian.
gawd! who that's pompous twonk sat next to her?
Don`t know but he`s a male chauvinist pompous twonk!
Couldn`t stand him!
the pompous celebrity lawyer saying 'perhaps imogen and others should learn from this'.......no mention that perhaps married men/women who are high profile should also learn........but they don't have too.......they chuck a bit of their wealth about and get a super injunction and sleep easy..........of course she was in the wrong.....but so was he.......and she is getting all the blame whilst he stays protected.it takes two to have an affair....and he wasn't bothered about his wife and kids when he was sleeping with imogen thomas
exactly spongey, i'da quite liked to shove a sherbet dab up him.
True!
so thats a good reason for an injunction?
the pompous celebrity lawyer saying 'perhaps imogen and others should learn from this'.......no mention that perhaps married men/women who are high profile should also learn........but they don't have too.......they chuck a bit of their wealth about and get a super injunction and sleep easy..........of course she was in the wrong.....but so was he.......and she is getting all the blame whilst he stays protected.it takes two to have an affair....and he wasn't bothered about his wife and kids when he was sleeping with imogen thomas
Spot on, Spongey.
The pompous twonk is Mr. Loophole.
Sorry too sound thick but what would happen too her if she said what his name was?
Aimee she would face imprisonment.
It's all over Twitter who the footballer is .Ryan Giggs.
Alan Shearer has also got an injunction ,he has been "seeing" Gabby Logan.
Aimee she would face imprisonment.
REALLY i can't believe that, money talks i guess, i;d say his name and take the punishment (how long would she get)?
I do believe this is how Imogen earns a living,9 footballers to date ,plenty kiss and tells.
She thought he would propose!!
I feel so sorry for his wife and young family.
Then shes dumber than I thought, how can he propose to her when he's already married....DUH. lol
so thats a good reason for an injunction?
Why shouldn't famous people take out super injunctions to keep their private life PRIVATE?
It's no ones business but their own, why would the press even want to print such unimportant drival.?
so thats a good reason for an injunction?
Why shouldn't famous people take out super injunctions to keep their private life PRIVATE?
It's no ones business but their own, why would the press even want to print such unimportant drival.?
Because people like to read tittle tattle about people in the public eye. When you put yourself into the public eye (successfully), you become of interest to others. We just can't help being nosey - obviously some people are more obsessed with scandal and gossip than others.
It also depends if you see the law as being blind or not, as the statue outside The Old Bailey depicts.
I agree in part that private lives are private lives, but that should go for everyone. A rich man shouldn't be able to buy a private life under law when a man or woman of moderate means can't.
For example, Andrew Marr (a journalist of all professions) quizzing Gordon Brown on malicious press tittle tattle about prescription painkillers that had already been officially denied, while holding a super injunction on his own affairs, surely that's the definition of hypocrisy?
Live TV. I would have outed him and suffered the consequences later. Why should he be allowed to hide because he has money?
Live TV. I would have outed him and suffered the consequences later. Why should he be allowed to hide because he has money?
I caught the beginning of the interview and it said it was recorded before the show, obviously in case she decided to say who it was
Live TV. I would have outed him and suffered the consequences later. Why should he be allowed to hide because he has money?
I caught the beginning of the interview and it said it was recorded before the show, obviously in case she decided to say who it was
Shame But I would get myself on Live TV somewhere and just keep dropping his name
Well we all know who it is....
the pompous celebrity lawyer saying 'perhaps imogen and others should learn from this'.......no mention that perhaps married men/women who are high profile should also learn........but they don't have too.......they chuck a bit of their wealth about and get a super injunction and sleep easy..........of course she was in the wrong.....but so was he.......and she is getting all the blame whilst he stays protected.it takes two to have an affair....and he wasn't bothered about his wife and kids when he was sleeping with imogen thomas
well said Spongey .... couldn't agree more on all points raised
Well we all know who it is....
I don't ..... pray tell ?
Well we all know who it is....
I don't ..... pray tell ?
His surname rhymes with PIGS
Do you really think it's him Erin?
It' s him..the divot.
so thats a good reason for an injunction?
Why shouldn't famous people take out super injunctions to keep their private life PRIVATE?
It's no ones business but their own, why would the press even want to print such unimportant drival.?
Because people like to read tittle tattle about people in the public eye. When you put yourself into the public eye (successfully), you become of interest to others. We just can't help being nosey - obviously some people are more obsessed with scandal and gossip than others.
It also depends if you see the law as being blind or not, as the statue outside The Old Bailey depicts.
I agree in part that private lives are private lives, but that should go for everyone. A rich man shouldn't be able to buy a private life under law when a man or woman of moderate means can't.
For example, Andrew Marr (a journalist of all professions) quizzing Gordon Brown on malicious press tittle tattle about prescription painkillers that had already been officially denied, while holding a super injunction on his own affairs, surely that's the definition of hypocrisy?
I agree that it should be one rule for everyone rich or poor, famous or not, however famous people (as long as they aren't promoting family values and getting high and mighty about morallity) I say let their private lives stay private.
I think Andrew Marr quizzing our former PM about any medication he might have been on is of direct interest to the public simply because it could effect how he runs the country, but Andrew Marr's private life doesn't really effect any of us one way or another, or indeed whoever Imogen has been slepping with this week effect any of us.
Imogen is greetin' because she didn't get her weekend spread in the Sunday tabloids and the pay check that went with it.However I'm not in favour of censure,if you can gag ther press with money therin lies danger.
Really?,at what stage did you make your wife aware of this situation?,I'm going to have a few words with my husband I think.