Yep. Tell the idiot that he will be ejected and watch how fast he nominates.

I have a feeling BB might just give the majority of hms their wish and put them all up this week. The only two who seem frightened to me are Charlie and Dave. Most of the others are fine with it. I don't blame some of them for being sceptical of Vash's idea though as it depends on people voting as they agree to. We all know what happened last time they tried this; Charlie (much though I don't like him) did as he said, while his fellow rebels just voted as they usually would, putting him and Lisa up, if BB had'nt disallowed their votes!

Should have been shown the door already by the headless chickens.

Tail wags dog

Why is he afraid of nominating? Does he think it would make him look uncool?

quote:

Originally posted by kimota:
I have a feeling BB might just give the majority of hms their wish and put them all up this week. The only two who seem frightened to me are Charlie and Dave. Most of the others are fine with it. I don't blame some of them for being sceptical of Vash's idea though as it depends on people voting as they agree to. We all know what happened last time they tried this; Charlie (much though I don't like him) did as he said, while his fellow rebels just voted as they usually would, putting him and Lisa up, if BB had'nt disallowed their votes!

they wont put them all up Siavash wont nom and he will put his friends in danger again

From the bit of Live Feed I was watching last night, it was Marcus who was banging on and on about nominations, and trying to get everyone to strategically nominate eachother so that everyone is up.

Marcus was also giving it the old "I want to leave" line again last night. He was slagging Bea off for saying she wanted to leave a few days ago, yet here he is doing exactly the same.

The hypocracy and immaturity of this man is never ending.

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
From the bit of Live Feed I was watching last night, it was Marcus who was banging on and on about nominations, and trying to get everyone to strategically nominate eachother so that everyone is up.

Marcus was also giving it the old "I want to leave" line again last night. He was slagging Bea off for saying she wanted to leave a few days ago, yet here he is doing exactly the same.

The hypocracy and immaturity of this man is never ending.

why when we talk about Siavash do you always have to bring Marcus into it as far as im aware Marcus has never refused to nom and probably never will

It does not bother me whether he noms or not. He is just playing around with the game, it does kind of make it a bit more interesting to see what BB will do.

I say keep on Siavash.

Besides, Sophie did not do it either last time.

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
From the bit of Live Feed I was watching last night, it was Marcus who was banging on and on about nominations, and trying to get everyone to strategically nominate eachother so that everyone is up.

Marcus was also giving it the old "I want to leave" line again last night. He was slagging Bea off for saying she wanted to leave a few days ago, yet here he is doing exactly the same.

The hypocracy and immaturity of this man is never ending.

why when we talk about Siavash do you always have to bring Marcus into it as far as im aware Marcus has never refused to nom and probably never will

Would you prefer me to start a "I wish Marcus would just shut up about Nominations" thread instead? I'll be happy to oblige.

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
From the bit of Live Feed I was watching last night, it was Marcus who was banging on and on about nominations, and trying to get everyone to strategically nominate eachother so that everyone is up.

Marcus was also giving it the old "I want to leave" line again last night. He was slagging Bea off for saying she wanted to leave a few days ago, yet here he is doing exactly the same.

The hypocracy and immaturity of this man is never ending.

why when we talk about Siavash do you always have to bring Marcus into it as far as im aware Marcus has never refused to nom and probably never will

Would you prefer me to start a "I wish Marcus would just shut up about Nominations" thread instead? I'll be happy to oblige.

you could but it would show your immaturity so go ahead .

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
From the bit of Live Feed I was watching last night, it was Marcus who was banging on and on about nominations, and trying to get everyone to strategically nominate eachother so that everyone is up.

Marcus was also giving it the old "I want to leave" line again last night. He was slagging Bea off for saying she wanted to leave a few days ago, yet here he is doing exactly the same.

The hypocracy and immaturity of this man is never ending.

why when we talk about Siavash do you always have to bring Marcus into it as far as im aware Marcus has never refused to nom and probably never will

Would you prefer me to start a "I wish Marcus would just shut up about Nominations" thread instead? I'll be happy to oblige.

you could but it would show your immaturity so go ahead .

Marcus was the one who was banging on and on about everyone nominating each other. Siavash just wanted to not nominate again. Marcus started masterminding an alternative strategy.

Please explain to me why it is immature to start a thread about Marcus doing exactly what you're moaning about Siavash doing, ie. not shutting up about nominations.

You've made it clear that you don't want me to implicate Marcus in this particular thread, and now it would be immature of me to discuss it in a seperate thread?

This is what annoys me sometimes.

People who are a fan of a particular housemate, complaining about things that other housemates do, even though the housemate they're a fan of also does the same.

It's a little thing I like to call DOUBLE STANDARDS.

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:
From the bit of Live Feed I was watching last night, it was Marcus who was banging on and on about nominations, and trying to get everyone to strategically nominate eachother so that everyone is up.

Marcus was also giving it the old "I want to leave" line again last night. He was slagging Bea off for saying she wanted to leave a few days ago, yet here he is doing exactly the same.

The hypocracy and immaturity of this man is never ending.

why when we talk about Siavash do you always have to bring Marcus into it as far as im aware Marcus has never refused to nom and probably never will

Would you prefer me to start a "I wish Marcus would just shut up about Nominations" thread instead? I'll be happy to oblige.

you could but it would show your immaturity so go ahead .

Marcus was the one who was banging on and on about everyone nominating each other. Siavash just wanted to not nominate again. Marcus started masterminding an alternative strategy.

Please explain to me why it is immature to start a thread about Marcus doing exactly what you're moaning about Siavash doing, ie. not shutting up about nominations.

You've made it clear that you don't want me to implicate Marcus in this particular thread, and now it would be immature of me to discuss it in a seperate thread?

This is what annoys me sometimes.

People who are a fan of a particular housemate, complaining about things that other housemates do, even though the housemate they're a fan of also does the same.

It's a little thing I like to call DOUBLE STANDARDS.

Marcus said they shouldnt refuse to nom because its pointless and that if they wanted to all be up then noming each other was the best way of doing it and as far as im aware thats not agaist the rules so your argument holds no weight .

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:
Marcus said they shouldnt refuse to nom because its pointless and that if they wanted to all be up then noming each other was the best way of doing it and as far as im aware thats not agaist the rules so your argument holds no weight .

But he's still talking about nominations, which is what the title of your thread is objecting to.

It doesn't say "i wish Siavash would just shut up about NOT nominating".

If it did, then that would be fair enough. But your title implies that you have a problem with housemates (or maybe just Siavash) talking about nominations at all, which would then also implicate Marcus.

Do you now understand why I made my original comparison?

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:
Marcus said they shouldnt refuse to nom because its pointless and that if they wanted to all be up then noming each other was the best way of doing it and as far as im aware thats not agaist the rules so your argument holds no weight .

But he's still talking about nominations, which is what the title of your thread is objecting to.

It doesn't say "i wish Siavash would just shut up about NOT nominating".

If it did, then that would be fair enough. But your title implies that you have a problem with housemates (or maybe just Siavash) talking about nominations at all, which would then also implicate Marcus.

Do you now understand why I made my original comparison?

yes but this was only after Siavash brought it up with the whole group .

Whilst watching LF last night.

I saw Siavash, Rodrigo Marcus, Sophie, Lisa, all discuss not nominating the only two opposed to this were Charlie and David.

Before I switched off, Sophie said she didn't like the idea of nomming each other, and she would never nom Siavash as she loves him, and she will not be nomming Rodrigo for the same reason.

She was in favour of them all refusing to nom.

In the bedroom Rodrigo was of the same stance as Sophie.

Rodrigo was in favour of them all refusing politely not to nom, Siavash asked him if he were sure with doing that, and Rodrigo said I am, I want to be up with everyone.


Siavash and Marcus were both pondering why some people seemed afraid to go up.

My conclusion is that the majority of the HM's feel the same, all were talking noms at great length, so I would not say Siavash is wholely responsible for the multiple discussions going on last night.

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:

quote:

Originally posted by ѕρι∂єямσηкєγ:

quote:

Originally posted by Lister_of_Smeg:
Marcus said they shouldnt refuse to nom because its pointless and that if they wanted to all be up then noming each other was the best way of doing it and as far as im aware thats not agaist the rules so your argument holds no weight .

But he's still talking about nominations, which is what the title of your thread is objecting to.

It doesn't say "i wish Siavash would just shut up about NOT nominating".

If it did, then that would be fair enough. But your title implies that you have a problem with housemates (or maybe just Siavash) talking about nominations at all, which would then also implicate Marcus.

Do you now understand why I made my original comparison?

yes but this was only after Siavash brought it up with the whole group .

Just because he brought it up first doesn't mean others were not thinking it, judging by the convos last night, people were glad with the idea put forward. From what I saw the only two that seemed disgruntled were Charlie and David, Lisa, seemed undecided, but was leaning more to the all being up notion. I am actually in favour of both motions put forward by Marcus and Siavash, why should a HM we've wanted out for ages cough*Lisa/Charlie* get a free ride to the final?

I think it's really great that he has the nerve to mention it... they are allowed to discuss nominations after all!!

they are all cool about going up except Charlie...

it's all good!

the two of them are discussing this because they are very aware it could be those two this week, they are just a devious pair of liars, Marcus I wanna go home, Siavash i am sorry, no realy I am very sorry, no but honest I am sorry,
pair of play acting pratts.

He's worried about being up against Marcus so he wants them all up.

He has to test the water but only when it suits him if he thinks he will be up. A coward in my book. Why did he come on. His trying to outwit BB is doing him no favours and losing him fans. I was a fan of his but going off him week by week.
Think it was the Noirin and GF betrayal.

quote:

Originally posted by Free Thinking:
He's worried about being up against Marcus so he wants them all up.

Thats rubbish and you know it free thinking! he is not worried at all about that...

me too. He is really annoying with all that now!

A few of us were just discussing this in the HL thread...

This is my take on things.

That's why I love the everybody up idea, because everytime it's mentioned Charlie cacks himself and starts slagging Siavash and complaining to mummy Lisa in the hope that she gets the nod about thier next block vote target.

Siavash knows this,(So does Marcus) so man I don't blame him.

Viva Siavash for exposing the little snake.


Another poster's reply.

I'd actually never thought of it like that.
So... if Charlie manages to escape nomination from his fellow hm's... he will be there final night. But he WON'T win.

Thats pretty much the worse place to finish from their point of view isn't it. Minimum exposure.

Another reply.

That is exactly what Vash is doing yes. They know theres a block vote and no way of beating it through conventional means. When Bea was having a go at Siavash about the protests Siavash got fed up of trying to hint to her and just outright said what part of this game dont you understand.

I notice BB edited out Marcus discussing nomination sabotage, but laboured negatively on Siavash. I also notice they edited out Marcus saying he wants to go home.

Hardly suprising then that a lot of people suddenly dislike Siavash but think Marcus is awesome.

We really do think what BB wants us to think.

Good for Siavash, they all should be up so we can decide who we want to stay in there. Obvious the likes of Charlie want a free ride and why should they have it?. Still block voting going on but this way fair for all housemates. Would you want a final of Lisa and her cohorts?.

Exactly....refusing to nominate is the only way to topple the block vote....if they are all up, it is the only way to make sure who we want actually gets to the final.

quote:

Originally posted by darloboy07:
Good for Siavash, they all should be up so we can decide who we want to stay in there. Obvious the likes of Charlie want a free ride and why should they have it?. Still block voting going on but this way fair for all housemates. Would you want a final of Lisa and her cohorts?.

Darlo well done mate my feelings exactly.

If it were block voting on team siavash side no one would be bothered

I do not think it would be an issue

That is the way it worked out this year and it happens sometimes

People were complaining when the faves were put up against each other and voted out because it wasnt fair... now that the HMs are doing something about it and putting everyone up, people changed their minds?

quote:

Originally posted by cup:
If it were block voting on team siavash side no one would be bothered

I do not think it would be an issue

That is the way it worked out this year and it happens sometimes

It just so happens that the most unlikeble HM's are all Lisa's mates who have gotten away the whole series, block voting and putting up people they want out.

quote:

Originally posted by MrMeatAndPotatoPie:
People were complaining when the faves were put up against each other and voted out because it wasnt fair... now that the HMs are doing something about it and putting everyone up, people changed their minds?

Exactly!

If we had a siavash/marcus head to head and lost one of them.....and kept that cretin charlie, it would be bile inducing. Block voting will probably ensure that happens.

quote:

Originally posted by fz:
If we had a siavash/marcus head to head and lost one of them.....and kept that cretin charlie, it would be bile inducing. Block voting will probably ensure that happens.

quote:

Originally posted by Free Thinking:
He's worried about being up against Marcus so he wants them all up.

Me too...don't want a Marcus v Siavash eviction next week, which will probably be how it is without some 'intervention'

Also...losing siavash or marcus next week will make the final night less edge of your seat stuff....at the moment either could win, whereas does charlie/lisa/david really have a fan base big enough to make them winners?

Losing one of the faves so soon to the end will make the outcome predictable and damp squibbish.

quote:

Originally posted by Supercalifragilistic:

quote:

Originally posted by Free Thinking:
He's worried about being up against Marcus so he wants them all up.

Me too...don't want a Marcus v Siavash eviction next week, which will probably be how it is without some 'intervention'

The HM's have little idea of who is the current fave, just because a HM survives doesn't mean they can't go the next week. So I doubt Siavash is arsed about being up against Marcus. Freddie, Marcus, and Siavash have all been at a huge disadvantage as a result of Lisa and her block voting tactics. Freddie was the most vocal out of the three, and crafty Lisa made it appear as if Freddie was telling lies, and got her henchmen and Bea to make Freddie's life hell. Lisa has had an unbelievable free ride in the house. I want all the HM's to take a stand, and watch her squirm.

quote:

Originally posted by Senora Reyes:

quote:

Originally posted by cup:
If it were block voting on team siavash side no one would be bothered

I do not think it would be an issue

That is the way it worked out this year and it happens sometimes

It just so happens that the most unlikeble HM's are all Lisa's mates who have gotten away the whole series, block voting and putting up people they want out.

I will not disagree on some of them on lisas mates,they have not gotton away with anything they choose the two camps,at the start it was all team lisa going one by one,now the tables have turned

It is unfortunate that is the way it goes.

Allowing them to discuss noms has ruined the show. Keeping Siavash in the house after refusing to nominate has made a mockery of the whole idea of BB too. I have a feeling this is the last BB.