Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Lori:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:

I have been very careful since I was banned, but I look and read and watch and I find that people who used to speak their mind don't anymore in case you think they are beyond the pale. It's not good.

I'm really sorry you don't like my moderation style, cologne. And I'm sorry that you don't think you can be yourself on here without fear of getting banned. I'm not sure, but I think you are in the minority (I hope).

 

I'll just say that if anyone has a problem with my style, you should simply PM Rosemary with your complaints.

I'm guessing too Lori 

FM
Originally Posted by ~hoochie~:
Originally Posted by MrMincePie:

I think people should ask themselves "Would I like to be badmouthed/accused of being someone else while not even being there?" only to return later to find quite a long page of hatred.

 

 Exactly - it's a simple but fundamental question

smileys not working......so *clapping hands smiley*

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ev (Peachy)

IMO....I think we should all post, and treat each poster as they post with us, a lot of posters just post for banter, some are real friends, some have differences of opinions...........but newbies or oldies all deserve to be able to pop in and add their two penceworth when they please.........to me this is starting to sound a bit like a school playground debate..........

Syd
Originally Posted by MrMincePie:

I think people should ask themselves "Would I like to be badmouthed/accused of being someone else while not even being there?" only to return later to find quite a long page of hatred.

 

 

My answer... no Perhaps it shouldn't of even been brought up the member who had no evidence of them even being Jonesy.

 

 

That's what I posted this afternoon.... how awful for any forum member to come on to find out that they had been the topic of conversation 

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

Karma_
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

No....you should have said News Corp.....as all those concerned are part or were part of that organisation....but hey ho, whatever floats your boat

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

No....you should have said News Corp.....as all those concerned are part or were part of that organisation....but hey ho, whatever floats your boat

But the story is about the actions of those who ran the News of the World publication and what sources were used to print stories within that publication. There are no current allegations towards another other brands within News Corp yet?

Karma_
Originally Posted by MrMincePie:

I think people should ask themselves "Would I like to be badmouthed/accused of being someone else while not even being there?" only to return later to find quite a long page of hatred.

 

 

My answer... no Perhaps it shouldn't of even been brought up the member who had no evidence of them even being Jonesy.

I haven't asked myself, but I've seen myself accused very recently (I wasn't there at the time also but it was later brought to my attention). It didn't get very long either, 3 or 4 main contributors I think. I couldn't be arsed to respond coz by the time I was told, I was sipping on a crispy white by a beach in Normandy and having too much fun  Still gotta say, I feel bad for Jonesy if he did see pages and pages....didn't see the original but this thread has opened a (mostly) mature discussion.

suzybean

TBH ......................I've been on both sides - I have had a truly horrible thread started about me and there were a few who joined in - the FM was banned and if I knew she was back un der another guise I would have no hesitation in outing her. I put my hands up and say - I'm guilty of having little digs (not anything major) but - it is what it is. I will say for every little dig I give - I get it back x10.

 

The hypocrisy in this thread has to be seen to be believed TBH. It would appear that everyone is whiter than white .................I stayed away cos I know I'm guilty of the odd dig or two but ..............Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez.

Soozy Woo
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

No....you should have said News Corp.....as all those concerned are part or were part of that organisation....but hey ho, whatever floats your boat

But the story is about the actions of those who ran the News of the World publication and what sources were used to print stories within that publication. There are no current allegations towards another other brands within News Corp yet?

Fair enough....but the original comment was a joke, sorry you took it seriously

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

No....you should have said News Corp.....as all those concerned are part or were part of that organisation....but hey ho, whatever floats your boat

But the story is about the actions of those who ran the News of the World publication and what sources were used to print stories within that publication. There are no current allegations towards another other brands within News Corp yet?

Fair enough....but the original comment was a joke, sorry you took it seriously

Erm, I didn't?!  Do you have a problem with me, Kaytee? Am rather confused.

Karma_
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

  

The hypocrisy in this thread has to be seen to be believed TBH. It would appear that everyone is whiter than white .................I stayed away cos I know I'm guilty of the odd dig or two but ..............Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez.

 

I've never had anything to do with REAL or Jonesy  - I saw some of the old spats though... as I've seen many 'spats' over the years with similar outcomes to this one and I have to say Sooz...  spot on.

 


 

Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by MrMincePie:
 

That's what I posted this afternoon.... how awful for any forum member to come on to find out that they had been the topic of conversation 

 

Indeed

Kaffs
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

No....you should have said News Corp.....as all those concerned are part or were part of that organisation....but hey ho, whatever floats your boat

But the story is about the actions of those who ran the News of the World publication and what sources were used to print stories within that publication. There are no current allegations towards another other brands within News Corp yet?

Fair enough....but the original comment was a joke, sorry you took it seriously

Erm, I didn't?!  Do you have a problem with me, Kaytee? Am rather confused.

Crossed wires then......no, I have no problem at all

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

No....you should have said News Corp.....as all those concerned are part or were part of that organisation....but hey ho, whatever floats your boat

But the story is about the actions of those who ran the News of the World publication and what sources were used to print stories within that publication. There are no current allegations towards another other brands within News Corp yet?

Fair enough....but the original comment was a joke, sorry you took it seriously

Erm, I didn't?!  Do you have a problem with me, Kaytee? Am rather confused.

Crossed wires then......no, I have no problem at all

Cool.

Karma_
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?

I thought that said 'Just what did you think Murdoch was supposed to do' and I was like 

 

But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate  

 

Pointless.....the NOTW is dead

Ah. Apolgies. I should have said 'the NOTW which is no longer in circulation but of which the Publisher, the CEO and former Editor of said former publication are currently involved in a huge legal scandal for hacking into the phones of dead people whilst the publication was in circulation'.

 

(There's a NOTW story running at the mo, you see )

No....you should have said News Corp.....as all those concerned are part or were part of that organisation....but hey ho, whatever floats your boat

But the story is about the actions of those who ran the News of the World publication and what sources were used to print stories within that publication. There are no current allegations towards another other brands within News Corp yet?

Fair enough....but the original comment was a joke, sorry you took it seriously

Erm, I didn't?!  Do you have a problem with me, Kaytee? Am rather confused.

Crossed wires then......no, I have no problem at all

Cool.

absolutely.....*cool smiley.....because they aren't working*

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Ev (Peachy):
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
FFS People.......An FM came into a thread and accused another FM of being someone else...and they got it wrong. Then people corrected the error and that should have been the end of it.
Instead......there was a lot of finger pointing and nastiness aimed at someone, who may or may not be a newbie.....and who wasn't even on the forum at the time.

No wonder that FM de-regged...when all's said and done, the thread was about a wrong accusation, NOT the failings or otherwise of an FM


nail=head

I'm still sitting on my hands 






Your nose-typing has improved greatly!
Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Rawky-Roo:
Originally Posted by Lori:

Well, I walk away for lunch and come back to 50 replies on this topic.

 

I'll just say to cologne that I couldn't disagree with you MORE. You guys disagree on stuff all the time, and nothing happens. This place is about being able to express your opinion. You ARE allowed to disagree, but you clearly aren't getting my point.

 

Wow, this is getting a bit depressing. I'm seeing former, forum, friendships (say that 10 times fast) falling apart in this thread. But can we ALL agree that I would make a good Velma from Scooby Doo?

Of course! Didn't we say?

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Ev (Peachy):
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
FFS People.......An FM came into a thread and accused another FM of being someone else...and they got it wrong. Then people corrected the error and that should have been the end of it.
Instead......there was a lot of finger pointing and nastiness aimed at someone, who may or may not be a newbie.....and who wasn't even on the forum at the time.

No wonder that FM de-regged...when all's said and done, the thread was about a wrong accusation, NOT the failings or otherwise of an FM


nail=head

I'm still sitting on my hands 






Your nose-typing has improved greatly!

Its all the bloody practice. 

Ev (Peachy)
Originally Posted by I am Sam:
Originally Posted by sprout:
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this

Not many Sprout.  Do you remember when it was fun on C4? (apart from the useless mods and persistent prats of course)

And now its spam, but the worse kind.  (Spam being defined as unsolicited or undesired electronic messages, but in this case with a fairly nasty message.)  Himself may have been a bit of a nobber but I am not sure he deserved the vilification that he received.  He never bothered me and I generally ignored him.  I never bothered him and he generally ignored me.  Works fine.

Next time I see him here I shall invite him for his favourite meal and we can talk about the good old days, if we can remember any.

Now thats better than green eggs....

stonks

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×