This topic has gone on a bit long now, any chance of it ending any time soon?
This topic has gone on a bit long now, any chance of it ending any time soon?
Can you explain what you mean by that Cologne? (The underlined comments...)
Your history.
Col, this is the sort of thing that Lori is talking about I think. It's certainly about the point I was making earlier.
I have no idea if Sparkles was ever anyone else on here or C4, pretty much don't care either tbh as I've never ever seen Sparkles being unpleasant or making trouble.
But I have seen her (I'm assuming Sparkles is female) being accused several times of being someone else with no shred of proof and once the finger pointing starts then it snowballs and some people will say there's no smoke without fire. I've even seen several posts accusing her and cupcake (another fm that I've never seen being anything but pleasant) of being the same person.
I get that there are previous fms (whether banned or not) who some people can't stand. There's one that I would cross the street to avoid.
But you know what? If a new fm is one that has been banned or caused aggro before then it won't be long until they do it again - some people just can't help themselves.
Until then I reckon we should give any newbie the benefit of the doubt
Neither do I and never intended to aim at any FM personally. I just don't like Lori's interference when there's a row on here. What's wrong with that? We've had rows for years and years. Why should somebody interfere with that unless it gets nasty? We used to think this forum had better moderation than C4, but at least they let us have a good argument without patronising us.
No they'd just ban us half way through and delete the thread....there was no arguement Col just alot of accusing without the person there to defend themselves, who then saw what was said and deregged....
Yeah Emms.....I'm outta here
Can you explain what you mean by that Cologne? (The underlined comments...)
Your history.
Col, this is the sort of thing that Lori is talking about I think. It's certainly about the point I was making earlier.
I have no idea if Sparkles was ever anyone else on here or C4, pretty much don't care either tbh as I've never ever seen Sparkles being unpleasant or making trouble.
But I have seen her (I'm assuming Sparkles is female) being accused several times of being someone else with no shred of proof and once the finger pointing starts then it snowballs and some people will say there's no smoke without fire. I've even seen several posts accusing her and cupcake (another fm that I've never seen being anything but pleasant) of being the same person.
I get that there are previous fms (whether banned or not) who some people can't stand. There's one that I would cross the street to avoid.
But you know what? If a new fm is one that has been banned or caused aggro before then it won't be long until they do it again - some people just can't help themselves.
Until then I reckon we should give any newbie the benefit of the doubt
Neither do I and never intended to aim at any FM personally. I just don't like Lori's interference when there's a row on here. What's wrong with that? We've had rows for years and years. Why should somebody interfere with that unless it gets nasty? We used to think this forum had better moderation than C4, but at least they let us have a good argument without patronising us.
Maybe it was Col
Yeah Emms.....I'm outta here
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
Perhaps people who had given up on us might see an ongoing debate that shows there's hope for us, and that not everyone sees things in the same way
Can you explain what you mean by that Cologne? (The underlined comments...)
Your history.
Col, this is the sort of thing that Lori is talking about I think. It's certainly about the point I was making earlier.
I have no idea if Sparkles was ever anyone else on here or C4, pretty much don't care either tbh as I've never ever seen Sparkles being unpleasant or making trouble.
But I have seen her (I'm assuming Sparkles is female) being accused several times of being someone else with no shred of proof and once the finger pointing starts then it snowballs and some people will say there's no smoke without fire. I've even seen several posts accusing her and cupcake (another fm that I've never seen being anything but pleasant) of being the same person.
I get that there are previous fms (whether banned or not) who some people can't stand. There's one that I would cross the street to avoid.
But you know what? If a new fm is one that has been banned or caused aggro before then it won't be long until they do it again - some people just can't help themselves.
Until then I reckon we should give any newbie the benefit of the doubt
Neither do I and never intended to aim at any FM personally. I just don't like Lori's interference when there's a row on here. What's wrong with that? We've had rows for years and years. Why should somebody interfere with that unless it gets nasty? We used to think this forum had better moderation than C4, but at least they let us have a good argument without patronising us.
No they'd just ban us half way through and delete the thread....there was no arguement Col just alot of accusing without the person there to defend themselves, who then saw what was said and deregged....
I don't remember being told never to mention a person's name. That seems to happen quite a bit on this forum and I just don't understand why.
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
Perhaps people who had given up on us might see an ongoing debate that shows there's hope for us, and that not everyone sees things in the same way
Yeah, another good point Hoochie
I don't remember being told never to mention a person's name. That seems to happen quite a bit on this forum and I just don't understand why.
I think it's the way in which it's mentioned though Col
I don't remember being told never to mention a person's name. That seems to happen quite a bit on this forum and I just don't understand why.
I remember a few times being told if anyone mentions such and such names they will be banned , surely you must have seen these posts, they were on often enough in the past, any time someone mentioned certain banned members name to be exact ?
I think Lori will be removing another thread,,,honestly! Children.
I don't remember being told never to mention a person's name. That seems to happen quite a bit on this forum and I just don't understand why.
Because it gets nasty. In a hurry.
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
To be fair... this is certainly not the worst forum, DS is alot worse. And on other forums theres usually alot of fm's throwing insults at each other.
You won't find a more friendly forum, however, it is alot easier to be a newbie on those forums... due to there being so many members on others, its easy to just blend in without facing an interrogation. With Gaga though, its not so easily done as we are a small community...
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
Perhaps people who had given up on us might see an ongoing debate that shows there's hope for us, and that not everyone sees things in the same way
TBH, we've all managed to find this place a couple of years ago. The ones that didn't never will and I think we are what we are and I like it. This is a nice forum and it does not need a heavy hand of moderation.
Roll on BB I think we need a new distraction...
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
To be fair... this is certainly not the worst forum, DS is alot worse. And on other forums theres usually alot of fm's throwing insults at each other.
You won't find a more friendly forum, however, it is alot easier to be a newbie on those forums... due to there being so many members on others, its easy to just blend in without facing an interrogation. With Gaga though, its not so easily done as we are a small community...
Maybe that's part of the problem Mince. If there were a lot of other posters maybe stuff would get lost 'in the ether' and forgotten about
I don't remember being told never to mention a person's name. That seems to happen quite a bit on this forum and I just don't understand why.
Because it gets nasty. In a hurry.
It doesn't. It just gets a bit agitated and I don't get why we aren't allowed to have emotions.
I think this is healthy discussion, really. I'd really like for you ALL to understand, and I'm willing to keep discussing it (to a point).
However, I'm at a loss to explain basic manners.
My mother said that if you didn't have something nice to say about someone, you shouldn't say it. When I step in (sorry...I think cologne used the word "interfere") it's because people are getting hurt, or are GOING to get hurt, and, by the way: that's my job--to keep that from happening as best as I can.
Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?
Roll on BB I think we need a new distraction...
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
Perhaps people who had given up on us might see an ongoing debate that shows there's hope for us, and that not everyone sees things in the same way
TBH, we've all managed to find this place a couple of years ago. The ones that didn't never will and I think we are what we are and I like it. This is a nice forum and it does not need a heavy hand of moderation.
I beg to differ. Sometimes it does
It doesn't. It just gets a bit agitated and I don't get why we aren't allowed to have emotions.
You ARE allowed to have emotions, for heavens' sake!
You AREN'T allowed to use those emotions to trash other people.
I have put on my Talking Heads CD "Psycho killer"
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
Perhaps people who had given up on us might see an ongoing debate that shows there's hope for us, and that not everyone sees things in the same way
TBH, we've all managed to find this place a couple of years ago. The ones that didn't never will and I think we are what we are and I like it. This is a nice forum and it does not need a heavy hand of moderation.
I beg to differ. Sometimes it does
Am I allowed to beg to differ with you?
I think this is healthy discussion, really. I'd really like for you ALL to understand, and I'm willing to keep discussing it (to a point).
However, I'm at a loss to explain basic manners.
My mother said that if you didn't have something nice to say about someone, you shouldn't say it. When I step in (sorry...I think cologne used the word "interfere") it's because people are getting hurt, or are GOING to get hurt, and, by the way: that's my job--to keep that from happening as best as I can.
Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?
Same as my mother Lori She was a good person at saying......see all and say nowt (nothing)
Someone got their wires crossed.
Not the first time and won't be the last.
Hopefully Jonesy will re-reg and we can all get on with it.
And to think potential 'new recruits' are watching this
Perhaps people who had given up on us might see an ongoing debate that shows there's hope for us, and that not everyone sees things in the same way
TBH, we've all managed to find this place a couple of years ago. The ones that didn't never will and I think we are what we are and I like it. This is a nice forum and it does not need a heavy hand of moderation.
I beg to differ. Sometimes it does
Am I allowed to beg to differ with you?
Of course.
Can you explain what you mean by that Cologne? (The underlined comments...)
Your history.
Col, this is the sort of thing that Lori is talking about I think. It's certainly about the point I was making earlier.
I have no idea if Sparkles was ever anyone else on here or C4, pretty much don't care either tbh as I've never ever seen Sparkles being unpleasant or making trouble.
But I have seen her (I'm assuming Sparkles is female) being accused several times of being someone else with no shred of proof and once the finger pointing starts then it snowballs and some people will say there's no smoke without fire. I've even seen several posts accusing her and cupcake (another fm that I've never seen being anything but pleasant) of being the same person.
I get that there are previous fms (whether banned or not) who some people can't stand. There's one that I would cross the street to avoid.
But you know what? If a new fm is one that has been banned or caused aggro before then it won't be long until they do it again - some people just can't help themselves.
Until then I reckon we should give any newbie the benefit of the doubt
Neither do I and never intended to aim at any FM personally. I just don't like Lori's interference when there's a row on here. What's wrong with that? We've had rows for years and years. Why should somebody interfere with that unless it gets nasty? We used to think this forum had better moderation than C4, but at least they let us have a good argument without patronising us.
No they'd just ban us half way through and delete the thread....there was no arguement Col just alot of accusing without the person there to defend themselves, who then saw what was said and deregged....
I don't remember being told never to mention a person's name. That seems to happen quite a bit on this forum and I just don't understand why.
I do but most of the time they'd just ban you with no bye or leave..I'd rather have the mods here than on ch4....
Not many Sprout. Do you remember when it was fun on C4? (apart from the useless mods and persistent prats of course)
And now its spam, but the worse kind. (Spam being defined as unsolicited or undesired electronic messages, but in this case with a fairly nasty message.) Himself may have been a bit of a nobber but I am not sure he deserved the vilification that he received. He never bothered me and I generally ignored him. I never bothered him and he generally ignored me. Works fine.
Next time I see him here I shall invite him for his favourite meal and we can talk about the good old days, if we can remember any.
It doesn't. It just gets a bit agitated and I don't get why we aren't allowed to have emotions.
You ARE allowed to have emotions, for heavens' sake!
You AREN'T allowed to use those emotions to trash other people.
I have been very careful since I was banned, but I look and read and watch and I find that people who used to speak their mind don't anymore in case you think they are beyond the pale. It's not good.
I think this is healthy discussion, really. I'd really like for you ALL to understand, and I'm willing to keep discussing it (to a point).
However, I'm at a loss to explain basic manners.
My mother said that if you didn't have something nice to say about someone, you shouldn't say it. When I step in (sorry...I think cologne used the word "interfere") it's because people are getting hurt, or are GOING to get hurt, and, by the way: that's my job--to keep that from happening as best as I can.
Just what did you think a Moderator was supposed to do, cologne?
well said manners cost nothing
Someone got their wires crossed.
Not the first time and won't be the last.
Hopefully Jonesy will re-reg and we can all get on with it.
Thing is Donks, will it all start again. Have certain peeps learnt anything
I think people should ask themselves "Would I like to be badmouthed/accused of being someone else while not even being there?" only to return later to find quite a long page of hatred.
My answer... no Perhaps it shouldn't of even been brought up the member who had no evidence of them even being Jonesy.
I have been very careful since I was banned, but I look and read and watch and I find that people who used to speak their mind don't anymore in case you think they are beyond the pale. It's not good.
I'm really sorry you don't like my moderation style, cologne. And I'm sorry that you don't think you can be yourself on here without fear of getting banned. I'm not sure, but I think you are in the minority (I hope).
I'll just say that if anyone has a problem with my style, you should simply PM Rosemary with your complaints.
But had a skim read and saw this hadn't got into a NOTW debate
Not quite yet. But there's still time.
I have been very careful since I was banned, but I look and read and watch and I find that people who used to speak their mind don't anymore in case you think they are beyond the pale. It's not good.
I'm really sorry you don't like my moderation style, cologne. And I'm sorry that you don't think you can be yourself on here without fear of getting banned. I'm not sure, but I think you are in the minority (I hope).
I'll just say that if anyone has a problem with my style, you should simply PM Rosemary with your complaints.
Or just bugger off to DS...
Or just bugger off to DS...
Well, I'd rather you stayed and tried to fix the problem, first.
HUGS FOR ALL( LOVE THIS PICTURE)
I think people should ask themselves "Would I like to be badmouthed/accused of being someone else while not even being there?" only to return later to find quite a long page of hatred.
Exactly - it's a simple but fundamental question
Access to this requires a premium membership.
Upgrade to VIP premium membership for just $25/year to unlock these benefits:
Ad-Free | Search Site | Start Dialogs |
Upload Photos | Upload Videos | Upload Audio |
Upload Documents | Use Signature | Block Members |
View Member Directory | Mark All Topics As Read | Edit Posts Anytime |
Post To Walls |