bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:now, now, let's not allow an inconvenient truth get in the way of a good lynching....quote:Originally posted by SJ:
They sat talking about it for ages and then talked about hiding it in other peoples drawers adn then hiding it in general and then figured out a pln to put it back, along with the tea. I watched it, they put it back.
Ok, I admit I may be wrong, but the intent was there and Bea wanted to nick it again today (all in the name of good clean fun of course)
quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by Rawky-Roo:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by Rawky-Roo:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:live feed thread said the can was put back and not drunk.quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
I think they put back an empty can, we cant see whether it's full or not.
They did drink something in the bathroom.
Well the LF thread can be wrong, it's hard to tell if the can was empty or not as Charlie covers up the can.
*pops head around door* you could be wrong too*legs it*
I did watch it live.
*locks the door before the swarm of Bea's come back*
*rings doorbell and runs away*
*boards up the doors nd windows and makes plans to move to a secret address*.
*sends out my Ninja (Mummy Maz) to find secret address*
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
They did steal the can and some tea and we all know why they did that, to upset Freddie.
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
*high fives*
quote:Originally posted by Rawky-Roo:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by Rawky-Roo:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by Rawky-Roo:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:live feed thread said the can was put back and not drunk.quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
I think they put back an empty can, we cant see whether it's full or not.
They did drink something in the bathroom.
Well the LF thread can be wrong, it's hard to tell if the can was empty or not as Charlie covers up the can.
*pops head around door* you could be wrong too
I did watch it live.
*locks the door before the swarm of Bea's come back*
*rings doorbell and runs away*
*boards up the doors nd windows and makes plans to move to a secret address*.
*sends out my Ninja (Mummy Maz) to find secret address*
*good luck to her*
was any tea or cider missing though after they put it back?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
They did steal the can and some tea and we all know why they did that, to upset Freddie.
quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
Definitely, and Bea I feel is desperate to get a reaction from Freddie before tomorrow night, why else would she want to pull the same stunt today.
quote:Originally posted by SJ:
They sat talking about it for ages and then talked about hiding it in other peoples drawers adn then hiding it in general and then figured out a pln to put it back, along with the tea. I watched it, they put it back.
And for the benefit of the viewrs, Bea kept saying "Charlie, you made me do it"...maybe if he told her to climb on the roof and jump off she would do that too!
quote:Originally posted by pigeonpie:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
Definitely, and Bea I feel is desperate to get a reaction from Freddie before tomorrow night, why else would she want to pull the same stunt today.
Of course she was, if BB fail to show a pretty major event that took place it shows what a nasty piece of work th pair of them are then it's disgusting.
quote:Originally posted by The Devil In Diamante:quote:Originally posted by SJ:
They sat talking about it for ages and then talked about hiding it in other peoples drawers adn then hiding it in general and then figured out a pln to put it back, along with the tea. I watched it, they put it back.
And for the benefit of the viewrs, Bea kept saying "Charlie, you made me do it"...maybe if he told her to climb on the roof and jump off she would do that too!
yeah, in a way its a pity they lost their balls. It would have been mental today.
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:was any tea or cider missing though after they put it back?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
They did steal the can and some tea and we all know why they did that, to upset Freddie.
Doesn't matter, the intent was there, are you suggesting they didn't mean any harm in the first place.?
Most of them on the highlights were saying that they think Freddie will go this week. I would like to see them proved wrong.
*chants from a far away place* freddieeeee drooooools, Beeeeeeea Rules
quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Charlie is being treated like a hero in the press and Bea like a poor innocent wronged woman, it will annoy me if they fail to show how nasty she was in wanting to upset Freddie by nicking his things.
I don't mind seeing them nick it but I don't think I can cope with him finding out and how he deals with it
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:was any tea or cider missing though after they put it back?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
They did steal the can and some tea and we all know why they did that, to upset Freddie.
Yes Jackson they drank the cider and put the tea back in Freddie's drawer. Bea was talking about putting the empty can back into Sophie's drawer to put the blame on her.
quote:Originally posted by squiggle:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:was any tea or cider missing though after they put it back?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
They did steal the can and some tea and we all know why they did that, to upset Freddie.
Yes Jackson they drank the cider and put the tea back in Freddie's drawer. Bea was talking about putting the empty can back into Sophie's drawer to put the blame on her.
Now im confused, I swore that they drank it but nearly everyone is saying different until you.
quote:Originally posted by SJ:
They sat talking about it for ages and then talked about hiding it in other peoples drawers adn then hiding it in general and then figured out a pln to put it back, along with the tea. I watched it, they put it back.
Someone on this forum saw the empty can after they drank the cider. C'mon get serious since when would Charlie have a can of cider and not drink it, that would be a first.
well, it's a different story , each time some one tells it.
quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by squiggle:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:was any tea or cider missing though after they put it back?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
They did steal the can and some tea and we all know why they did that, to upset Freddie.
Yes Jackson they drank the cider and put the tea back in Freddie's drawer. Bea was talking about putting the empty can back into Sophie's drawer to put the blame on her.
Now im confused, I swore that they drank it but nearly everyone is saying different until you.
Its actually immaterial whether they drank it or not Videostar. It was a nasty prank. Don't forget Charlie "Did you touch my towel Freddie" and then LECTURED him for about 15 mins with Freddie saying sorry man.
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
well, it's a different story , each time some one tells it.
Are you going to suggest that they never stole it then Jackson?
quote:Originally posted by squiggle:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by squiggle:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:was any tea or cider missing though after they put it back?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:bit like this thread then?quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
Whether they put it back or not the intent to cause trouble was there.
They did steal the can and some tea and we all know why they did that, to upset Freddie.
Yes Jackson they drank the cider and put the tea back in Freddie's drawer. Bea was talking about putting the empty can back into Sophie's drawer to put the blame on her.
Now im confused, I swore that they drank it but nearly everyone is saying different until you.
Its actually immaterial whether they drank it or not Videostar. It was a nasty prank. Don't forget Charlie "Did you touch my towel Freddie" and then LECTURED him for about 15 mins with Freddie saying sorry man.
I totally agree, the intent was there to cause trouble for Freddie, right on the eve of the eviction.
i doubt it.quote:Originally posted by squiggle:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
well, it's a different story , each time some one tells it.
Are you going to suggest that they never stole it then Jackson?
i think i am saying , not suggesting, that the story is different each time some one tells it.
i am also saying that in order for some thing to be stolen it's fairly much a pre requisite for it to be gone.
quote:Originally posted by Rawky-Roo:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by Rawky-Roo:quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:live feed thread said the can was put back and not drunk.quote:Originally posted by Videostar:
I think they put back an empty can, we cant see whether it's full or not.
They did drink something in the bathroom.
Well the LF thread can be wrong, it's hard to tell if the can was empty or not as Charlie covers up the can.
*pops head around door* you could be wrong too
I did watch it live.
*locks the door before the swarm of Bea's come back*
*rings doorbell and runs away*
O dear Rawky!
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i am also saying that in order for some thing to be stolen it's fairly much a pre requisite for it to be gone.
If they didn't lose their bottle (forgive the pun) and know that the public wouldn't like them for it, put the tea back and maybe an empty can.
I watched it live, in bed, got so angry i had to get up and come on line to see if anyone else was watching. They DIDN'T drink it, they put it back but what got me soooo angry was Charlie screaming at Freddie for getting up 'to cause trouble'! He said Freddie was in bed laughing, well i think i would have laughed too hearing MY name getting banded about in the middle of an agruement when i wasn't even there.
I'm just sorry that Freddie is up against Marcus...the only two HM's with any integrity. There's joking and having a laugh but when you set out to not only STEAL but also discuss hiding the evidence in someone elses belongings ...well that , to me, proves the kind of people we're talking about.
Bea, last night, was the one to constantly bring Freddies name up, I'm not against her for disliking him but she seems totally obssessed!
An utter Beatch!!
I'm just sorry that Freddie is up against Marcus...the only two HM's with any integrity. There's joking and having a laugh but when you set out to not only STEAL but also discuss hiding the evidence in someone elses belongings
...well that , to me, proves the kind of people we're talking about.Bea, last night, was the one to constantly bring Freddies name up, I'm not against her for disliking him but she seems totally obssessed!
An utter Beatch!!
i admire your stamina vid..quote:Originally posted by Videostar:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i am also saying that in order for some thing to be stolen it's fairly much a pre requisite for it to be gone.
If they didn't lose their bottle (forgive the pun) and know that the public wouldn't like them for it, put the tea back and maybe an empty can.
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i am also saying that in order for some thing to be stolen it's fairly much a pre requisite for it to be gone.
PMSL i agree in principal....but does that mean a joyrider hasn't committed a crime if he brings the car back?
yes , they jump started the cider and an around a council estate with it and left it on the waste ground behind the flats.quote:Originally posted by Bethni:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i am also saying that in order for some thing to be stolen it's fairly much a pre requisite for it to be gone.
PMSL i agree in principal....but does that mean a joyrider hasn't committed a crime if he brings the car back?
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:yes , they jump started the cider and an around a council estate with it and left it on the waste ground behind the flats.quote:Originally posted by Bethni:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i am also saying that in order for some thing to be stolen it's fairly much a pre requisite for it to be gone.
PMSL i agree in principal....but does that mean a joyrider hasn't committed a crime if he brings the car back?
No Jackson....they put it back with the key still in the ignition.
well depends on who you listen to!quote:Originally posted by Bethni:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:yes , they jump started the cider and an around a council estate with it and left it on the waste ground behind the flats.quote:Originally posted by Bethni:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i am also saying that in order for some thing to be stolen it's fairly much a pre requisite for it to be gone.
PMSL i agree in principal....but does that mean a joyrider hasn't committed a crime if he brings the car back?
No Jackson....they put it back with the key still in the ignition.
Maybe with the petrol tank half empty. 
Anyone ever watch Billy Connelly's take on opera?
He says its 2/3s too long because they say everything so many times. Heres the youtube link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m__pVO__6oY
Now, when you read this thread, after watching that clip, maybe you will see this thread in the smae light as i do.
BTW: To know what happened ... here is the link to BB and what happened last night, you wont have to rely on us, or Channel 4, you can actually see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears exactly what happened:
http://www.bigbroweb.co.uk/big...lfwit-treatment.aspx
He says its 2/3s too long because they say everything so many times. Heres the youtube link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m__pVO__6oY
Now, when you read this thread, after watching that clip, maybe you will see this thread in the smae light as i do.
BTW: To know what happened ... here is the link to BB and what happened last night, you wont have to rely on us, or Channel 4, you can actually see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears exactly what happened:
http://www.bigbroweb.co.uk/big...lfwit-treatment.aspx