Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I disagree with his actions, but mainly with the sheer inability of people in the BB house to express themselves. Only Rodrigo has come close to the reason behind the anger, that Siavash clearly thinks that he is too good a character to be thrown out, hence the reason that he contunually and without reprimand breaks the fundamental rules. Its like playing monopoly and not throwing the dice - pointless. People go on and on about game players - how about talking about the non game player ... he should be ejected and let the game continue as it should be played.
SJ
quote:
Originally posted by Azure:
quote:
Originally posted by Shar:
quote:
Originally posted by kattymieoww:
Charlie was flapping his arms so much I thought the twat would take off,Hate him! Mad


He is the vilest person EVER to go in the house ... what a claim to fame eh ...? Thumbs Up


sorry Shar but that badge belongs to the lewd crude 35yr old nasty waste of space Marcus.


I think marcus is a coward azzie, but my vileness award definitely goes to Charlie ... Wink
Shar
quote:
Originally posted by Shar:
quote:
Originally posted by Azure:
quote:
Originally posted by Shar:
quote:
Originally posted by kattymieoww:
Charlie was flapping his arms so much I thought the twat would take off,Hate him! Mad


He is the vilest person EVER to go in the house ... what a claim to fame eh ...? Thumbs Up


sorry Shar but that badge belongs to the lewd crude 35yr old nasty waste of space Marcus.


I think marcus is a coward azzie, but my vileness award definitely goes to Charlie ... Wink


How is Marcus a coward?
Videostar
quote:
Originally posted by SJ:
I disagree with his actions, but mainly with the sheer inability of people in the BB house to express themselves. Only Rodrigo has come close to the reason behind the anger, that Siavash clearly thinks that he is too good a character to be thrown out, hence the reason that he contunually and without reprimand breaks the fundamental rules. Its like playing monopoly and not throwing the dice - pointless. People go on and on about game players - how about talking about the non game player ... he should be ejected and let the game continue as it should be played.


That is all very well SJ, but if the fundamental rules are corrupted by block nominations, how can it be called a game? It can then only be called a game with corrupt rules and if someone chooses not to play a corrupt game with corrupt rules, you cannot blame them for refusing to play at all.
Twee Surgeon
quote:
Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:
quote:
Originally posted by SJ:
I disagree with his actions, but mainly with the sheer inability of people in the BB house to express themselves. Only Rodrigo has come close to the reason behind the anger, that Siavash clearly thinks that he is too good a character to be thrown out, hence the reason that he contunually and without reprimand breaks the fundamental rules. Its like playing monopoly and not throwing the dice - pointless. People go on and on about game players - how about talking about the non game player ... he should be ejected and let the game continue as it should be played.


That is all very well SJ, but if the fundamental rules are corrupted by block nominations, how can it be called a game? It can then only be called a game with corrupt rules and if someone chooses not to play a corrupt game with corrupt rules, you cannot blame them for refusing to play at all.
Exactly they have cheated for weeks only option is to no longer play along.
CaptVimes
quote:
Originally posted by Azure:
quote:
Originally posted by Shar:
quote:
Originally posted by kattymieoww:
Charlie was flapping his arms so much I thought the twat would take off,Hate him! Mad


He is the vilest person EVER to go in the house ... what a claim to fame eh ...? Thumbs Up


sorry Shar but that badge belongs to the lewd crude 35yr old nasty waste of space Marcus.



so you bought a new dictionary then Smiler
Lockes
Thumbs Up, Siavash stuck by his principles he is right some of them in there are scared of being up even Sophie spoke sense and stuck up for him for a change and good on her for doing so. Charlie, Rodrigo, David getting aggressive because they are the ones who want to be there till the end on a free ride but I can see why they don't think it's not fair on the group.
darloboy (Play The Game!)
quote:
Originally posted by ~hoochie~:
Nominating is a fundamental rule of BB - he should have been kicked out the first time he tried it!


Each time Siavash has not nominated there has been a consequence to his actions and he along with the HM's have been punished.

Violence is another ejectable offense...

Rodrigo threw a punch at Charlie during an angry exchange...he nor Charlie were never punished let alone ejected.

Rodrigo threw a bottle in Charlie's head during another angry exchange..he was never punished...

Nadia during BB5 punched Jason in the gob on fight night....She went on to win BB.
Senora Reyes
quote:
Originally posted by ~hoochie~:
Nominating is a fundamental rule of BB - he should have been kicked out the first time he tried it!


BB has the right to change the rules whenever it wants Big Grin...not nominating results in consequences not necessarily eviction...BB has played it well, did you really expect them to kick out one of the most interesting characters and leave us with Lisa and her cronies....Endemol need viewers...after enduring Nana for ten minutes last night i couldn't have watched any more.
fz
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:
quote:
Originally posted by SJ:
I disagree with his actions, but mainly with the sheer inability of people in the BB house to express themselves. Only Rodrigo has come close to the reason behind the anger, that Siavash clearly thinks that he is too good a character to be thrown out, hence the reason that he contunually and without reprimand breaks the fundamental rules. Its like playing monopoly and not throwing the dice - pointless. People go on and on about game players - how about talking about the non game player ... he should be ejected and let the game continue as it should be played.


That is all very well SJ, but if the fundamental rules are corrupted by block nominations, how can it be called a game? It can then only be called a game with corrupt rules and if someone chooses not to play a corrupt game with corrupt rules, you cannot blame them for refusing to play at all.
Exactly they have cheated for weeks only option is to no longer play along.

I strongly disagree. They clearly like their own groups - yes, it may be cliques, but thats what happens, people bond, and like particular people and not others. Lisa has stuck to her guns, stick to the rules and vote who pisses you off. They don't influence, they know who they want gone and the reason is obvious.
And its not against the rules to discuss nominations.
SJ
quote:
Originally posted by SJ:
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:
quote:
Originally posted by SJ:
I disagree with his actions, but mainly with the sheer inability of people in the BB house to express themselves. Only Rodrigo has come close to the reason behind the anger, that Siavash clearly thinks that he is too good a character to be thrown out, hence the reason that he contunually and without reprimand breaks the fundamental rules. Its like playing monopoly and not throwing the dice - pointless. People go on and on about game players - how about talking about the non game player ... he should be ejected and let the game continue as it should be played.


That is all very well SJ, but if the fundamental rules are corrupted by block nominations, how can it be called a game? It can then only be called a game with corrupt rules and if someone chooses not to play a corrupt game with corrupt rules, you cannot blame them for refusing to play at all.
Exactly they have cheated for weeks only option is to no longer play along.

I strongly disagree. They clearly like their own groups - yes, it may be cliques, but thats what happens, people bond, and like particular people and not others. Lisa has stuck to her guns, stick to the rules and vote who pisses you off. They don't influence, they know who they want gone and the reason is obvious.
And its not against the rules to discuss nominations.


Take tonight for an instance. Four of the Lisa gang nominated Siavash and Marcus. In the early part of the show, six people of the Lisa gang used one of their votes to nominate Freddie. One week five of the Lisa gang nominated the same people, one of which was Freddie. What would you call this? Would you call it fair? Would you, more importantly, call it block nominating? If you would, then you must call the game corrupt in its fundamental rules. Thus leading on to Siavash who doesn't agree with the corrupt block nominations and who does not want to become another victim of a corrupt game. So he withdraws from the game.
Twee Surgeon
quote:
Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:
Take tonight for an instance. Four of the Lisa gang nominated Siavash and Marcus. In the early part of the show, six people of the Lisa gang used one of their votes to nominate Freddie. One week five of the Lisa gang nominated the same people, one of which was Freddie. What would you call this? Would you call it fair? Would you, more importantly, call it block nominating? If you would, then you must call the game corrupt in its fundamental rules. Thus leading on to Siavash who doesn't agree with the corrupt block nominations and who does not want to become another victim of a corrupt game. So he withdraws from the game.

I would call it a game and when you have to decide who to vote, you pick the perosn who you dislike the most. We saw during the Freddy things that there were huge arguments going on, they voted people who they saw having arguments. Since they were on the other side, ie at the smoking place, they were watching this fromoutside and probably getting a headache from it.
The day that the nominations were allowed, Lisa ranin and said to Sophie who are you viting for? She answered and Lisa said so are we - thats not block voting, thats people being irritated by the same person and having a chance to get rid of them - in the way that the rules state - by voting.
SJ
Siavash went up in my estimation simply by the way he dealt with that baying mob! The look of hate on Charlie's face had to be seen to be believed - what a nasty excuse for a man he is!

Siavash has jumped to 2nd place with the bookies and only has Sophie in front. I feel it would be a fitting end to this year's BB if he and Sophie were the last two in the house.
jeanoj
quote:
Originally posted by Jeanoj:
Siavash went up in my estimation simply by the way he dealt with that baying mob! The look of hate on Charlie's face had to be seen to be believed - what a nasty excuse for a man he is!

Siavash has jumped to 2nd place with the bookies and only has Sophie in front. I feel it would be a fitting end to this year's BB if he and Sophie were the last two in the house.


Agreed Jean and I have to big up Sophie, she was very supportive and brave, and so desrves her place in the final, and indeed to be one of the final two. Clapping
Senora Reyes
quote:
Originally posted by Jeanoj:
Siavash went up in my estimation simply by the way he dealt with that baying mob! The look of hate on Charlie's face had to be seen to be believed - what a nasty excuse for a man he is!

Siavash has jumped to 2nd place with the bookies and only has Sophie in front. I feel it would be a fitting end to this year's BB if he and Sophie were the last two in the house.


Blimey that's good news.....to be honest I'd like him to win for his calmness tonight....but I'd love sophie to be runner up.

I hope his mardy old dad saw that tonight and was proud of him.
fz

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×