I always thought that this would be a great nomination twist: | GaGaJoyJoy

Topics

Rawky-Roo

Follow

I've had this idea for noms twist before I was born and still think it would be an awesome thing to do. Anywho, here it is (warning its a tad long):

- All housemates go into the task room where there is a circular table and 14 chairs around it.

- In the center of the table is a spinner in the shape of an arrow.

- All housemates sit in the chairs and take turns spinning the arrow.

- Whichever HM the arrow ends up pointing at is 'out' and must make their way to the sofas.

- The game carries on until there is one HM left who is declared the 'Winner'.

- The Winner is called to the diary room where all the other HM's can see them on the plasma screen, from the sofas.

- BB then says 'Congratulations Sunshine (

) on winning the crappy named 'spinning game'. Your reward is as follows....you are now safe from this weeks eviction.

- Sunshine's happy, the housemates aren't, but there's more....

- BB continues 'However there are 9 more 'safes' to be filled by your fellow HM's. You must now choose the 9 you would like to save from eviction. The 4 you choose not to save will automatically face the public vote on Friday.

- Sunshine reveals the names of the 9 she would like to save, leaving the other 4 facing eviction.

- The plasma screen turns off, the HM's start bickering.

- BB then says to Sunshine: 'Big Brother would like you let you in on a secret. On Friday not 1, not 2 but 3 of the housemates facing the public vote will be evicted. To clarify, on Friday there will be the first ever TRIPLE eviction. This must remain a secret, if you reveal this secret to anyone, the whole house will be severely punished. You may now leave the diary room.

What do you think? Imagine on the eviction night being the only one knowing that there is a triple eviction....I think it would get a few panties in a twist i do

Replies sorted oldest to newest

MathematicsMember

I like the idea of a spinning arrow on the table, but I don't like that you used Sunshine in your example.

A pretentious little madam with too much to say.

I also think that three people getting evicted is a little too much. 2 maybe.

MoominMember

Sounds good to me Rawky - and I like the fact you chose Sunshine

suzybeanMember

Rawky, you're a very gifted person...I'd go as far as saying you're touched

FairfaxMember

Reference:Maths

I like the idea of a spinning arrow on the table, but I don't like that you used Sunshine in your example. A pretentious little madam with too much to say.

DemantoidMember

I just think anyone caught trying to influence noms (this means you, Scabby and Govan) should automatically be put up for eviction themselves.

FairfaxMember

Reference:

I just think anyone caught trying to influence noms (this means you, Scabby and Govan) should automatically be put up for eviction themselves

I agree and can't understand why BB doesn't enforce this

Dame_Ann_AverageMember VIP10 years

I just want ordinary evictions, any nomination talk and those offending are straight up for eviction. Apart from that no jiggery pokery, just plain simple no twist nominations.

Yogi19Member 10 years

Reference: Dame

I just want ordinary evictions, any nomination talk and those offending are straight up for eviction. Apart from that no jiggery pokery, just plain simple no twist nominations.

Me too.

Rawky-RooMember 10 years

party poopers

Yogi19Member 10 years

Reference:

party poopers

I thought your twist was very good though, Rawky - better than the ones BB have done.

Dame_Ann_AverageMember VIP10 years

Reference:

party poopers

The problem with twists Rawky, sometimes great house mates are in danger of biting the dust. The tampering with nominations and evictions leads us to having the likes of Charley and Nikki to name a couple off hand, being in the house when the public overwhelmingly voted for them to go.

Former Member

I don't like nomination twists tbh - to much opportunity for BB to tweak the process.

Add Reply

Sign In To Reply

<div id="{%=id%}" class="reveal-modal small h-alert-modal-popup" data-reveal>
    <div class="first-modal-focus focus-utility-element" tabindex="0" aria-label="Inside Modal"></div>

<h4 id="{%=id%}_title" class="margin-bottom-10 popup-title"></h4>
    <div id="{%=id%}_body" class="margin-bottom-10 popup-body">
        </div>

<ul id="{%=id%}ButtonGroup" class="button-group h-popup-buttons even-button-group even-1">
    <li id="{%=id%}Okay_buttonContainer"><a id="{%=id%}Okay" href="javascript:void(0);" class="button success no-margin-bottom h-alert-modal-ok-button" role="button">OK</a><script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            function {%=id%}Okay_click(event, data) {
            {%=id%}Popup.hide();
        }
        
                $('#{%=id%}Okay').on('click', {%=id%}Okay_click);
        })();
    </script></li></ul><a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close-reveal-modal" aria-label="Close Modal">&#215;</a><div class="last-modal-focus focus-utility-element" tabindex="0"></div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            {%=id%}Popup = new SS.Popup.ModalPopup('{%=id%}');
        })();
    </script>