But it really isn't up to sophie and Siavash to try and decide that is it? BB wont be told what to do ..........it's pretty arrogant on their part to try and second guess BB.
If they refuse to nominate BB should tell them that the time is ticking .....for every 10 se cond hesitation Β£1,000.00 off the prize money.
quote:Originally posted by ΡΟΞΉβΡΡΠΌΟΞ·ΠΊΡΞ³:quote:Originally posted by cup:
And everytime someone else gets punished not them.
All housemates went up and Hira went out when they broke rules
All housemates lost food when they broke rules
Other housemates have been nominated whether they were going to nominate them or not,when they broke rules
What i do not like is nothing directly happens to rule breakers and them only
And they know this because of all went on.He was so desperately sorry for putting them all up,but was happy to take chance on it today again.
If he wants out of game he should go,if he is so sorry for putting all up he shouldnt take on it again obviously that was a load of rubbish,why did he not beg them all to put him up like marcus did if he so wants to go and not take part in nominations then,why involve others.
Well it's not strictly true that everytime someone else gets punished, not them.
Take the week that Marcus and Siavash broke nomination rules quite recently. Siavash for not nominating, and Marcus for influencing nominations.
The punishment for that was everyone involved in a vote to save eviction, including both Siavash and Marcus.
Then there was last week, where the punishment for various housemates discussing nominations resulted in the abolishment of the nomination chat rule. No one was affected at all there.
There isn't really any consistancy, at any level, when it's come to punishments this series.
The week it was vote to save the others were punished along with them i agree but why not just rule breakers it always involves the others.
I can see your points on this thread spider and take them on board as valid points,but i fear he will push it so far he will go before his time like fred,because after fred went he could have been right up there for winner.
It just does not sit right with me something about what he is doing,and like fred you could see him slipping more and more and people may get fed up with all this nonsence of siavash as well.
What annoys me the most in al the years of bb is someone moaning i dont want to nominate,and the punishments this year not for rulebreakers but others not involved is not right in my eyes
There were three people i wanted to get to final week at very least fred marcus and siavash great housemates,but i do often post as well as that,when i dont agree with them.
quote:Originally posted by ΡΟΞΉβΡΡΠΌΟΞ·ΠΊΡΞ³:quote:Originally posted by Free Thinking:quote:Originally posted by ΡΟΞΉβΡΡΠΌΟΞ·ΠΊΡΞ³:quote:Originally posted by Free Thinking:
I still say that for someone who says he wants to be out of the game Siavash has a huge interest in nominations and who should be up for eviction.
As I recall he requested to be put up this week as his punishment. Sophie said the same too.
Why didn't he ask other HMs to nominate him then? It's not like Big Brother are about to just give him the punishment he says he wants. I think he realises that others like Bea and David are more likely to go this week.
Maybe he did ask them to nominate him.
I still can't understand why you're so against nomination rule breaks. Being a Marcus fan, I'd have thought you'd be all up for it, considering both occasions that everyone went up, Marcus had been involved in the rule breaks.
Which is it. Double standards or irrational hate?
Marcus wasn't involved in one rule break in reality, he didn't ask people to nominate himself then. They just put some blame on him to get Siavash off the hook. The other time was just part of a general rebellion and wasn't specifically about Marcus at all.
quote:Originally posted by frenchbread:
Its true that some of them want a free ride to the final
I don't agree with huosemates manipulating who is up for eviction bt rule breaking. That is BBs job.