Oh not this again..it's utter crap! I watched a bit of the original...not very cerebral was it.

Well I suspect E-Coli did for them in the original.Anus to mouth etc...

blimey..!

sorry katty lol

Why you small divot!

dunno what a divot is - but im tall lol

and i probabley am a divot

i shall google it

I heard on the news the other day, the follow up isn't even being given a rating. I've got the first one recorded, but haven't seen it yet. Hey.......what can I say? I'm not an avid film watcher, although I have spurts 

 although I have spurts 

i have them

i usually take peppermint capsules

think this movie could gain cult status

Still not seen it, and I hire crappy horror DVDs most weeks. 

Originally Posted by sprout:

 although I have spurts 

i have them

i usually take peppermint capsules

Nawty Pirate! 

We Scots think of it as a small sod,though the definition is correct.

Don't spend any money on it!

it has!

and didnt sell one-i chucked it the bin

now everyone wants it

you can download it

Not in the UK, it's not...

The BBFC have refused it a certificate, meaning that it cannot (legally) be released in the UK.

http://www.bbfc.co.uk/newsrele...de-ii-full-sequence/

The makers never planned a UK cinema release anyway, but this prevents a DVD release too.

Apparently there are some serious questionmarks over whether it will be released in the US either. The first film got an "R" rating in the States, but I'd be amazed if the MPAA give it anything less than a "NC-17". That's roughly equivalent to the UK's "18" certificate, but is considered commercial death in the States and NC-17 films are normally edited down to get an "R" certificate. However,the BBFC didn't think editing was possible: "given that the unacceptable content runs throughout the work, cuts are not a viable option in this case”...

Yes I have seen it.  Its crap but very watchable for some odd reason!  I also heard that the second one is banned in the UK because it's so disturbing evidently.  Really wanna see it now. 

You might want to read the description of some scenes given in the BBFC's adjudication first (see my previous post for a link). I rather doubt I'd be allowed to post the description here...)

Each to their own, but let's just say that whatever happens regarding certification, I think I'll pass on this one...

I've heard the 2nd one has been banned.

I've seen the 1st one and its utter tosh. Yes the 'idea' of it is grim but when you come to see it, it just looks so stupid.  I actually just laughed at it, didn't find it disgusting at all.

Also the acting was terrible. Its just a bad, bad film...and not in a good way.

The second one just sounds outright sick and nasty..

I didnt know the second one had been banned until the other day.  I'm going to google it now and find out what it's about.

The film has been banned in this country because the BBFC think it is likely that anyone distributing or showing this film would be breaking the law. The BBFC goes into more detail on their site but I'm not going into details here. I never saw the first film and have no wish to, but the second film goes well beyond the first film.

I don't know that the film would be submitted to the MPAA in the States. Although the first film got an R cert, the director's cut was unrated. Unlike the UK, films do not have to be certified to be able to be shown there.

Thanks El Loro...  I know I said yesterday that I really wanna see it now, but I have actually looked at the synopsis, and it sounds bloody ghastly.  The first one was kind of a bit gross and creepy, but this second one sounds horrendous.  Think I will actually give it a miss. 

The gist of the BBFC's concerns are that while the first one tells a fictional account in a horror movie style and the grossness is implied the second one features someone's sexual gratification to the first film and them going about creating their own human centipede.  The second one doesn't imply but shows scenes implied in the first film. 

Ah, right - thanks, I didn't know that. From a little further research, though, I understand that the US cinema chains generally don't show unrated films.

Saw the first one, and loved it I understand why the thought of it disturbs so many but in actual fact there was nothing to 'see' it was all in the mind.  It struck me as a modern day old fashioned horror, where its the suspense that gets to you.  I really liked it for that reason.  I only got it out of blockbusters to see how horrific and rubbish it was, and was shocked to find myself enjoying it

Censorship's a load of bollocks.

oh no, a thread about that film 

Saw the first one - the acting was ham, but the idea of that actually happening made me feel sick.

Couldn't watch the second I dont think.

Yes it was the idea, and what it entailed...yack yack  lol 

I've seen some bits of the second one and no way should that be shown to the public. It's just plain disgusting.

when you wake up in the night and you cant catch your breath make sure youre not connected to an anus and are part of human centipede 3 MWUHAHAAAA

I do feel fairly inadequate that I've not till now managed to view the movie.  Though by the sounds of it the concept is rather more accomplished than the finished artefact. 

Are not plenty of disgusting things shown?  For adults to decide whether to watch? 

Good god

eh?wot u mean is idea is good

film aint so good

posh u is

lol

I didn't say good, I said accomplished. 

Depends if you'd feel comfortable with peado and bestiality titles at your local Blockbusters?

I did invite that.

Censorship outwith clearly criminal acts produced actively for the film...is bollocks (is the expanded version of my original sentence).