Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm glad the myth of entrappment has been exposed as just that. I agree with dame, if they can't bring themselves to have gay and unmarried couples to stay, they are in the wrong business. They are entitled to their religious beliefs, but when these coincide with bigotted views, they have to ask themselves some very probing questions.
cologne 1
blimey

im on me own on this one..lol

i dont agree with them people-but surely you can pick and choose who stays
like that prog with the woman/post op who said no more male/female parties
its your gaff-so you choose who stays

if it was a big company like novotel etc..i'd be shouting the odds
but it was a private house/BB
and im sure they were set up..!!
anyway..i think you should have the right to choose who stays in your home
pirate1111
pirate, its against the law for them to refuse a couple , purely because they are gay, thats how the Judge ruled for the couple. They can refuse if someone, is say, drunk, anti social etc, that is their discretion. It no longer becomes their home, when they rent a room out, it becomes a business and rules of law have to be abided by , they were wrong in this instance
FM
cologne
i answered
actually-im a twat-but you know that
but i do honestly believe that the bigoted couple should choose
and skylark
as above
its not a big company
just a couple of old'uns who stick to their guns
wrong or right..?
ive booked a hotel/room
theyve seen my piercings/tattoo's/hair
when i've got there, ive been told its a mistake and refunded my deposit
i got over it..
pirate1111
smarting buttocks *snigger*
yeah they did
and skylark
honest im disgusted about the way they behaved
but i keep saying
it s their house

and now im off to listen to kylie im very gay friendly
and also pissed
you can all stay at my house
i dont care..
as long as youve got money to buy breakfast
no bacon though..incase i insult muslim friendly people..
pirate1111

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×