Skip to main content

And I dont know why that is, everyone wants the nice but dim or borng HM's to win every year.

I just dont get it.


Emma Kennedy on BBBM tonight slated Freddie and Bea because " they shouldn't have used their intelligence against the others in the house"

Basiclly meaning that their background and better education should bar them from fighting their own corner in the face of thick chavs like David and Lisa.

Class war, nooooo surely not. Roll Eyes

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Videostar:
And I dont know why that is, everyone wants the nice but dim or borng HM's to win every year.

I just dont get it.


Emma Kennedy on BBBM tonight slated Freddie and Bea because " they shouldn't have used their intelligence against the others in the house"

Basiclly meaning that their background and better education should bar them from fighting their own corner in the face of thick chavs like David and Lisa.

Class war, nooooo surely not. Roll Eyes



Do you not think your opinion is a little biased? You speak of Freddie and Bea as being intelligent and Lisa and David as being 'thick chavs'...............I really dont see what intelligence has to do with it. You're either nice or you're not ...................IMO Bea really and truly isn't nice in any way shape or form ........she may be intelligent but .........it doesn't do anything for me.
Soozy Woo
quote:
Originally posted by Soozy woo:
quote:
Originally posted by Videostar:
And I dont know why that is, everyone wants the nice but dim or borng HM's to win every year.

I just dont get it.


Emma Kennedy on BBBM tonight slated Freddie and Bea because " they shouldn't have used their intelligence against the others in the house"

Basiclly meaning that their background and better education should bar them from fighting their own corner in the face of thick chavs like David and Lisa.

Class war, nooooo surely not. Roll Eyes



Do you not think your opinion is a little biased? You speak of Freddie and Bea as being intelligent and Lisa and David as being 'thick chavs'...............I really dont see what intelligence has to do with it. You're either nice or you're not ...................IMO Bea really and truly isn't nice in any way shape or form ........she may be intelligent but .........it doesn't do anything for me.


But the less intelligent someone is the less open they are and the more narrow minded potentially. Also better conversation makes someone more worth watching more. The dim ones normally just depend on having good looks to do well.
Free Thinking
quote:
Originally posted by Soozy woo:
quote:
Originally posted by Videostar:
And I dont know why that is, everyone wants the nice but dim or borng HM's to win every year.

I just dont get it.


Emma Kennedy on BBBM tonight slated Freddie and Bea because " they shouldn't have used their intelligence against the others in the house"

Basiclly meaning that their background and better education should bar them from fighting their own corner in the face of thick chavs like David and Lisa.

Class war, nooooo surely not. Roll Eyes



Do you not think your opinion is a little biased? You speak of Freddie and Bea as being intelligent and Lisa and David as being 'thick chavs'...............I really dont see what intelligence has to do with it. You're either nice or you're not ...................IMO Bea really and truly isn't nice in any way shape or form ........she may be intelligent but .........it doesn't do anything for me.


Hey listen, im only going on what one of those magazine writers in BBBM said, they suggested that Bea and Freddie shouldn't have argued with Lisa and David because of their better intelligence.

Although I added the chav bit myself. Big Grin
Videostar

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×