Night all those off to bed
Goodnight those who are leaving us!
Nite Ros and KT
Nanite - early to bedders
Goodnight everyone 
Emma is looking very good tonight.
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
personally I've never gone along with theory that BB has faves. I see no reason why they would choose one HM over another - they are all 'chosen' in the first place.
me either... and this is what I posted about the safe house
I don't think it's a 'fix' as such bringing out the safe house for these nominees. I just think it's pretty savvy producing. I think BB has a number of scenarios all ready at the start of the run and they just bring them in to play when it's the right time. I don't think they say 'Ok, wk 1, normal nom.. week 2, surprise eviction, week 3 safe house.. . Would the safe house have been used at some stage - yes. Would it have been this week if different people were up - no. Do I mind that? No - I'm thankful. What a wast of a safe house if the four nominees had been Sophie, Sam, Daley and Charlie... Think about it.
I agree 100% - I never buy into BB conspiracy stuff - IMO it's all about trying to make good telly.
But whatever the reasons for doing it, surely it's still manipulation?
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Emma is looking very good tonight.
you say that every time lol
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Emma is looking very good tonight.
you say that every time lol
Oh no Jen, I have criticised her attire a few times over the last week.
night to all that are going
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Emma is looking very good tonight.
you say that every time lol
I like her hair but don't think the outfit does a lot for her - she looks better in a straight up and down number IMO.
Sam favourite to win again. 
WTF has he done in that house other than being deaf.?
Hazel is pure evil
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
personally I've never gone along with theory that BB has faves. I see no reason why they would choose one HM over another - they are all 'chosen' in the first place.
me either... and this is what I posted about the safe house
I don't think it's a 'fix' as such bringing out the safe house for these nominees. I just think it's pretty savvy producing. I think BB has a number of scenarios all ready at the start of the run and they just bring them in to play when it's the right time. I don't think they say 'Ok, wk 1, normal nom.. week 2, surprise eviction, week 3 safe house.. . Would the safe house have been used at some stage - yes. Would it have been this week if different people were up - no. Do I mind that? No - I'm thankful. What a wast of a safe house if the four nominees had been Sophie, Sam, Daley and Charlie... Think about it.
I agree 100% - I never buy into BB conspiracy stuff - IMO it's all about trying to make good telly.
But whatever the reasons for doing it, surely it's still manipulation?
Manipulation = producing the show, yes. It's tweaking to make good telly - not to make sure any individual stays or goes is what we mean.
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
personally I've never gone along with theory that BB has faves. I see no reason why they would choose one HM over another - they are all 'chosen' in the first place.
me either... and this is what I posted about the safe house
I don't think it's a 'fix' as such bringing out the safe house for these nominees. I just think it's pretty savvy producing. I think BB has a number of scenarios all ready at the start of the run and they just bring them in to play when it's the right time. I don't think they say 'Ok, wk 1, normal nom.. week 2, surprise eviction, week 3 safe house.. . Would the safe house have been used at some stage - yes. Would it have been this week if different people were up - no. Do I mind that? No - I'm thankful. What a wast of a safe house if the four nominees had been Sophie, Sam, Daley and Charlie... Think about it.
I agree 100% - I never buy into BB conspiracy stuff - IMO it's all about trying to make good telly.
But whatever the reasons for doing it, surely it's still manipulation?
Hmmmmm - I don't see it as manipulation TBH - I agree that they create stories but I don't think it's to manipulate us into voting for one HM over another - more to keep it 'interesting/entertaining'.
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Emma is looking very good tonight.
you say that every time lol
Oh no Jen, I have criticised her attire a few times over the last week.
I must have missed that lol
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Emma is looking very good tonight.
you say that every time lol
I like her hair but don't think the outfit does a lot for her - she looks better in a straight up and down number IMO.
I think she has had some shocking outfits of late. For me (and it is only personal opinion) tonights is a welcome upswing. She could drag her hair through a bush and I would still like it 
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Emma is looking very good tonight.
you say that every time lol
I like her hair but don't think the outfit does a lot for her - she looks better in a straight up and down number IMO.
I agree Soozy
We think along the same lines Kaffy
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
personally I've never gone along with theory that BB has faves. I see no reason why they would choose one HM over another - they are all 'chosen' in the first place.
me either... and this is what I posted about the safe house
I don't think it's a 'fix' as such bringing out the safe house for these nominees. I just think it's pretty savvy producing. I think BB has a number of scenarios all ready at the start of the run and they just bring them in to play when it's the right time. I don't think they say 'Ok, wk 1, normal nom.. week 2, surprise eviction, week 3 safe house.. . Would the safe house have been used at some stage - yes. Would it have been this week if different people were up - no. Do I mind that? No - I'm thankful. What a wast of a safe house if the four nominees had been Sophie, Sam, Daley and Charlie... Think about it.
I agree 100% - I never buy into BB conspiracy stuff - IMO it's all about trying to make good telly.
But whatever the reasons for doing it, surely it's still manipulation?
Hmmmmm - I don't see it as manipulation TBH - I agree that they create stories but I don't think it's to manipulate us into voting for one HM over another - more to keep it 'interesting/entertaining'.
That's the editing department that does that 
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
We think along the same lines Kaffy
I've never seen why they would want a particular housemate to win (although we did get Nikki rammed down our throats a bit)
Emma's problem is she feigns it.
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Sam favourite to win again.
WTF has he done in that house other than being deaf.?
just read that betfair has Gina the fav for the win
here is the link ,means sod all to me 
http://www.betfair.com/exchange/special-bets/market?id=1.109740810&mpch=ads&rfr=63
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Saveloy!
It's actually no bad Jen 
I've stayed in a few.
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Sam favourite to win again.
WTF has he done in that house other than being deaf.?
just read that betfair has Gina the fav for the win
here is the link ,means sod all to me
http://www.betfair.com/exchange/special-bets/market?id=1.109740810&mpch=ads&rfr=63
That is just one bookies, but oddschecker is all the bookies odds, and Sam is fav with them...but it's early days, I have to believe that common sense will win the day.
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Sam favourite to win again.
WTF has he done in that house other than being deaf.?
just read that betfair has Gina the fav for the win
here is the link ,means sod all to me
http://www.betfair.com/exchange/special-bets/market?id=1.109740810&mpch=ads&rfr=63
That is just one bookies, but oddschecker is all the bookies odds, and Sam is fav with them...but it's early days, I have to believe that common sense will win the day.
cheers
Is this meant to be funny?
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
personally I've never gone along with theory that BB has faves. I see no reason why they would choose one HM over another - they are all 'chosen' in the first place.
me either... and this is what I posted about the safe house
I don't think it's a 'fix' as such bringing out the safe house for these nominees. I just think it's pretty savvy producing. I think BB has a number of scenarios all ready at the start of the run and they just bring them in to play when it's the right time. I don't think they say 'Ok, wk 1, normal nom.. week 2, surprise eviction, week 3 safe house.. . Would the safe house have been used at some stage - yes. Would it have been this week if different people were up - no. Do I mind that? No - I'm thankful. What a wast of a safe house if the four nominees had been Sophie, Sam, Daley and Charlie... Think about it.
I agree 100% - I never buy into BB conspiracy stuff - IMO it's all about trying to make good telly.
But whatever the reasons for doing it, surely it's still manipulation?
Manipulation = producing the show, yes. It's tweaking to make good telly - not to make sure any individual stays or goes is what we mean.
But 'tweaking to make good telly' (in their opinion) could at times include NOT wanting someone to be evicted at a particular time, even if they are not backing anyone in particular to win.
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Sam favourite to win again.
WTF has he done in that house other than being deaf.?
just read that betfair has Gina the fav for the win
here is the link ,means sod all to me
http://www.betfair.com/exchange/special-bets/market?id=1.109740810&mpch=ads&rfr=63
That is just one bookies, but oddschecker is all the bookies odds, and Sam is fav with them...but it's early days, I have to believe that common sense will win the day.
cheers
YW.
I just don't get the cut aways to those two idiots on the street. What's it all about, no humour for sure.
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Saveloy!
It's actually no bad Jen
I've stayed in a few.
Looks nice! 
Hand emphasis.
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
I just don't get the cut aways to those two idiots on the street. What's it all about, no humour for sure.
Agree totally - seems BB Ch5 are being weird again
However I am liking Jet's analysis.
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
personally I've never gone along with theory that BB has faves. I see no reason why they would choose one HM over another - they are all 'chosen' in the first place.
me either... and this is what I posted about the safe house
I don't think it's a 'fix' as such bringing out the safe house for these nominees. I just think it's pretty savvy producing. I think BB has a number of scenarios all ready at the start of the run and they just bring them in to play when it's the right time. I don't think they say 'Ok, wk 1, normal nom.. week 2, surprise eviction, week 3 safe house.. . Would the safe house have been used at some stage - yes. Would it have been this week if different people were up - no. Do I mind that? No - I'm thankful. What a wast of a safe house if the four nominees had been Sophie, Sam, Daley and Charlie... Think about it.
I agree 100% - I never buy into BB conspiracy stuff - IMO it's all about trying to make good telly.
But whatever the reasons for doing it, surely it's still manipulation?
Manipulation = producing the show, yes. It's tweaking to make good telly - not to make sure any individual stays or goes is what we mean.
But 'tweaking to make good telly' (in their opinion) could at times include NOT wanting someone to be evicted at a particular time, even if they are not backing anyone in particular to win.
yes I'd go along with that .........I'm okayish with that because at the end of the day - the 'most popular' wins. It is a game ........we have all in the past got a bit silly - I myself am desperate for Wolfy to be out but ........if she stays this week it'll be all the sweeter when she does eventually go.
The only time I've seriously grrrrrrrrrrrrrd was the Connor debacle last year. Hopefully lessons have been learned.