Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Baz:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Aimee:
I'm thinking Pauline may give the killer nomination to Danielle as she's not seeming very popular and they won't want her around for long telling them not to swear etc

That's if she can give it to a Hm that's already up .

I suppose she could,it's all very ass in the air I don't think BB know what the heck they are doing .

I think it's more a case of them trying to work out out how to fiddle things to make it fit their darn plan !!!

for sure Baz.

FM
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

 

 

This just smacks of a weak management team behind this programme. How can you keep handing out warnings without any obvious consequence. Helen must know by now that she can transgress at will and nothing more than a verbal slap will be handed out.

 

The programme makers must realise that this casts them in a poor light and in my opinion makes them look weak, ineffectual, poor decision makers and as close as you can get to complete incompetence.

 

Consider this: How many warnings do you think you would get at work before disciplinary proceedings began and how long before dismissal from post if you continued?

 

 

Or is this a fabrication by the producers to garner public interest in what is a poor start to the series?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I just came in to post exactly this EC - not buying it - why tell us she's been warned 14 times - they could have kept that quiet unless they want to wet our appetite and increase viewers - smacks of desperation to me 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×