Skip to main content

I think what he did was nice and to be pilloried over it seems harsh, especially when he is the first PM to do this and with his sight difficulties as well, but as usual the Scum  has to find things to have a go at him about.

As for the soldiers mum, it was horrible the way he died and we should not be there, but that's another thread, to publicise it seems wrong to me.
â™ĨPinkBabe1966â™ĨThe Angel under the tree!
Reference:
C'mon. This is in the great tradition of local papers: the photo of a housewife or pensioner looking disgusted and miserable, holding up the offending letter, next to a story of some bureaucratic cockup or customer service disaster. Obviously, this is a bit more important than finding a half chewed Wispa Gold when you open the packet, or receiving a letter requesting immediate payment of 1p from British Gas otherwise the bailiff will be called it but it's the same principle.
Actually, the Sun has included exactly one of those sort of photos in its article:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/ho...-our-name-right.html

At least the poor woman knows the reason why her son was out in Afghanistan: "He was so proud to be serving his country and making life better for the people of Afghanistan." rather than the numpties over the weekend who think they're out there fighting for and protecting our freedoms.
FM
Reference:
Daniel J* 4966 Forum PostsToday at 19:20 (Edited: ) Reference: The indefinite article ein is omitted when speaking of an individual's profession or residence but is necessary when speaking in a figurative sense as Kennedy did. Since the president was not literally from Berlin but only declaring his solidarity with its citizens, "Ich bin Berliner" would not have been correct. Somebody's been reading Wikipedia. I checked that exact article out to verify the spelling just before I posted
If you were from Berlin, you'd say:  Ich komme aus Berlin. That wouldn't have sounded quite as dramatic, although most people had a laugh about the wording anyway.
cologne 1
After the fun poked at Kennedy at the time and over the years, I would hope even Gordon made an effort to avoid the phrase, technically correct or not. 

Birmingham Christmas Fair has some lovely berliners for sale every year.  Mmm.  And those chocolate covered flavoured marshmallow things on a biscuit base. 
FM
Last edited {1}
Well if he and his war criminal predecessor hadn't sent our troops into unwinnable situations, then this offensive letter would not have happened.


That said if taken in isolation, should not matter so much, apparently the slime mandleson has taken umbridge at the sun for "forcing" the pm to apologise, that in itself is a total disgrace.


Whilst I feel for the Janes family, I cannot help myself at laughing at GB yet again showing what a total and utter idiot he is.
Cigarettes & Alcohol
Reference fabienne Today at 19:30:
 Reference: Cosmo "Human error is inevitable and that's why I believe that you take your grieveance back to the source (rather than the newspaper)."


Yes, that's why I asked how it got to the attention of the newspaper. I don't know how the press get to find out these things.
The Sun's own website contains a filmed interview with the mother, which appears to be the source of the story. It therefore looks like the mother (or at least the family) approached the press.


Although I understand it would be upsetting for her to have her son's name given incorrectly, and while I would join the chorus suggesting that Brown sacks his PA for not spotting the mistake: the lad's name was Jamie Janes. it doesn't take much to realize the scope for error there, and  I absolutely refuse to believe that Gordon Brown is the first person ever to get it wrong...


The final irony is that amongst all the errors in the letter that the mother points out on the video (and it's interesting that she doesn't draw attention to the occasions where Gordon gets Jamie's name correct), she happens to mention that Jamie was severely dyslexic...
Eugene's Lair
Reference LGS Today at 09:05:
it now appears the Sun taped the PRIVATE tlephone call, and has put the transcript in the paper, SHAME ON THEM for exploiting her grief.
Officially, The Sun is claiming that Mrs Janes recorded the conversation on her own initiative. However as the call took place on late Sunday night (i.e. as the original story was going to the presses), the whole thing smacks of a Sun set-up.


One interesting point: a contributor over on the Sun's own comment boards has pointed out that it's illegal to record a telephone conversation without informing the other person. I wonder if Mrs Janes is going to apologize to Gordon Brown?
Eugene's Lair
I think it has all been blown out of proportion BUT I don't think his poor eyesight is an excuse for bad spelling.  You can still spell with your eyes closed so while it may excuse the handwriting, it does not excuse the fact that the guy can't spell.

Maybe he didn't have much time with all the letters he's writing to families at the minute.
S
Reference:
No excuse imo - someone should have checked the letter first. As for the lady going to the press - I would imagine that she is desperate to have any sort of platform to air her views, anger and sorrow - who can blame her? What she has gone through, is the worst possible thing
See that's the thing, he's the prime minister of the UK, why the hell should such brief letters need to be proof read?  They should be good enough without the need of a checker, surely?  It's not like it had typos or anything, it's a sorry state of affairs.
S

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×