Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It's unbelievable that this country even signed this treaty as it's so biased in favour of the Americans.

What I want to know is why under the holy grail of Human Rights law is this being allowed to happen? He won't be treated well and is a suicide risk! Amazing how the Law Lords will vote in favour of terrorists not being extradited but it's ok for citizens with medical conditions to be Roll Eyes
FM
I think this case has been particularly high profile just as the drug smuggling girl in Laos.

If a crime has been committed in another country then that country has a right to exercise it's own judicial process.

The British Government has interferred in enough cases around the world by bringing pressure on them to 'return' convicted criminals to serve their sentences here. Which, let's face it, is the softest in the world.
MysTerry
quote:
Originally posted by MysTerry:
I think this case has been particularly high profile just as the drug smuggling girl in Laos.

If a crime has been committed in another country then that country has a right to exercise it's own judicial process.

The British Government has interferred in enough cases around the world by bringing pressure on them to 'return' convicted criminals to serve their sentences here. Which, let's face it, is the softest in the world.


I think you will find that the civilised countries such as Canada, the Scandanavian states, and Holland have had an even better system than us.
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by Aquarius 11:
I'm really sad about this ruling, it shames
our justice system.


it does Nod the fact that he has Aspergers should have been a mitigating factor. Whilst he is obviously a computer whizz, anyone on the autistic spectrum struggles to survive in normal every day life - they'll eat him alive.

I wonder if he has recourse to apply to the European Courts of Human Rights to stop this extradition?
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Pengy:
quote:
Originally posted by Aquarius 11:
I'm really sad about this ruling, it shames
our justice system.


it does Nod the fact that he has Aspergers should have been a mitigating factor. Whilst he is obviously a computer whizz, anyone on the autistic spectrum struggles to survive in normal every day life - they'll eat him alive.

I wonder if he has recourse to apply to the European Courts of Human Rights to stop this extradition?



I hope he can take it to the European Court
Pengy (tho I'm not sure about the legality of it).

It's sad that we have to do that though don't you think? The fact that he could be treated
more humanely in a court other than one in his
own country should shout a warning.
Shameful business. Shake Head
Aquarius
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
You may remember Gary was in my sig a while back. They may as well just hand our keys over to the Americans since they seem to be able to ride roughshod over us.
They even have the arch twat Charlie Wolf giving his twopennorth at the moment. Mad

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl...s-extradition-appeal


we dont agree on much, but on this matter we are in absolute agreement, its a complete disgrace.
B
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
You may remember Gary was in my sig a while back. They may as well just hand our keys over to the Americans since they seem to be able to ride roughshod over us.
They even have the arch twat Charlie Wolf giving his twopennorth at the moment. Mad

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl...s-extradition-appeal


we dont agree on much, but on this matter we are in absolute agreement, its a complete disgrace.


Aw! Don't say that! We have only disagreed on one subject. Although I willn't be boycotting my Glaxo flu jab. Laugh
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by Mentalist:
quote:
Originally posted by charmer:
if the americans had any sense-they'd hire him not prosecute/persecute him


Absolutely, if he could find his way into their computer systems then he could tell them how to prevent it.


or given the trouble they are causing him he could write a how to book and publish it on the net, give them something to REALLY worry about.
B
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by Mentalist:
quote:
Originally posted by charmer:
if the americans had any sense-they'd hire him not prosecute/persecute him


Absolutely, if he could find his way into their computer systems then he could tell them how to prevent it.


or given the trouble they are causing him he could write a how to book and publish it on the net, give them something to REALLY worry about.
They dont need him, they caught him and already know how he did it. This trial is just sending a message to future Garys.
CaptVimes
American computers are really easy to hack into anyway. I dunno what all the fuss is about. You sit at your computer, point your browser at the target computer, and it turns the screen black with PASSWORD written in huge letters. You then think of the name of the owner's pet dog, or his birthday, or his wife's name, or something about his hobby and you're in! I've seen loads of American films just like that.
FM
I am going to be a bit controversial here. I have very little sympathy with any hackers. They always try and hide under the I wasnt doing any harm banner. But the truth is they do a lot of harm to individuals, hospitals, businesses and there has to be a strong incentive for people not to go anywhere near a military computer.

The crime though was committed in this country so he should be judged by this country's laws. This is a very stupid and horrible precedent to make. Its along the lines of what they have done with Pirate Bay in Sweden.
CaptVimes
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by Mentalist:
quote:
Originally posted by charmer:
if the americans had any sense-they'd hire him not prosecute/persecute him


Absolutely, if he could find his way into their computer systems then he could tell them how to prevent it.


or given the trouble they are causing him he could write a how to book and publish it on the net, give them something to REALLY worry about.
They dont need him, they caught him and already know how he did it. This trial is just sending a message to future Garys.


What message would that be? Heal yourself?

One feels so powerless. One can't boycott anything American since one doesn't eat any of that fast food shieght or drink any fizzy sugary piss. One can't threaten not to vote Labour. What can one do?
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by Mentalist:
quote:
Originally posted by charmer:
if the americans had any sense-they'd hire him not prosecute/persecute him


Absolutely, if he could find his way into their computer systems then he could tell them how to prevent it.


or given the trouble they are causing him he could write a how to book and publish it on the net, give them something to REALLY worry about.
They dont need him, they caught him and already know how he did it. This trial is just sending a message to future Garys.


What message would that be? Heal yourself?

One feels so powerless. One can't boycott anything American since one doesn't eat any of that fast food shieght or drink any fizzy sugary piss. One can't threaten not to vote Labour. What can one do?
So anyone with Asbergers can break any law they want then, cool. See my other post he should be tried here and any medical condition should be taken into account.
CaptVimes
quote:
Originally posted by squiggle:
quote:
Originally posted by Mathematics:
I don’t think a lot of people actually realize the severity of his crimes. He knowingly hacked into confidential government files. Compassion aside, that is a monstrous offense.


Also really foolhardy. You don't mess with the Yanks or the Russians.


That Bin Laden (assuming he is a real person) does. Though to be fair we helped with the latter.
Garage Joe
The inequities of the extradition agreement aside, which clearly need reviewing if the statistics are correct, this is a case of a man who has hacked into computer systems, contrary to law.

He has committed an offence for which he should stand trial. And remember, the extradition is for that trial. He has not yet been convicted of any crime (although he has admitted guilt) and the court has not heard his case and not heard any mitigating circumstances. The outcome of any trial is not yet known and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that any sentence he may get could be served in an English prison.

The problem is that the powers that be are stuck between a rock and a hard place. I think the US also has a quandary: any outcome sends a message. They have to been seen to be cracking down on this as well as cracking down on this. The problem is that terrorism, for example, is not limited to planes being flown into buildings or people strapping explosives onto their body and detonating them in a crowd of people. Cyber terrorism is a real threat also. And, while I am not suggesting that McKinnon is a cyber terrorist or was doing anything more than trying to find evidence of UFOs, if someone hacks into US military computer systems what are they (the US) going to do.. as I have said, rock and a hard place.
tupps
quote:
Originally posted by charmer:
my step-son has aspergers, he's in his 20's and really doesnt know right from wrong
so ive got a lot of understanding for this gary bloke and his mom
its a waste of time, effort and money to send him to america, where on trial, he'll just probably agree with everything thats thrown at him

hardly fair is it?


Exactly.
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by tupps:
The inequities of the extradition agreement aside, which clearly need reviewing if the statistics are correct, this is a case of a man who has hacked into computer systems, contrary to law.

He has committed an offence for which he should stand trial. And remember, the extradition is for that trial. He has not yet been convicted of any crime (although he has admitted guilt) and the court has not heard his case and not heard any mitigating circumstances. The outcome of any trial is not yet known and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that any sentence he may get could be served in an English prison.

The problem is that the powers that be are stuck between a rock and a hard place. I think the US also has a quandary: any outcome sends a message. They have to been seen to be cracking down on this as well as cracking down on this. The problem is that terrorism, for example, is not limited to planes being flown into buildings or people strapping explosives onto their body and detonating them in a crowd of people. Cyber terrorism is a real threat also. And, while I am not suggesting that McKinnon is a cyber terrorist or was doing anything more than trying to find evidence of UFOs, if someone hacks into US military computer systems what are they (the US) going to do.. as I have said, rock and a hard place.


Indeed Nod Perhaps then the Americans should go to the heart of cyber terrorism and start extraditing Chinese hackers. Or would that be too difficult for them?

Myself, I doubt that extraditing Gary will send a message to anyone.
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
quote:
Originally posted by tupps:
The inequities of the extradition agreement aside, which clearly need reviewing if the statistics are correct, this is a case of a man who has hacked into computer systems, contrary to law.

He has committed an offence for which he should stand trial. And remember, the extradition is for that trial. He has not yet been convicted of any crime (although he has admitted guilt) and the court has not heard his case and not heard any mitigating circumstances. The outcome of any trial is not yet known and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that any sentence he may get could be served in an English prison.

The problem is that the powers that be are stuck between a rock and a hard place. I think the US also has a quandary: any outcome sends a message. They have to been seen to be cracking down on this as well as cracking down on this. The problem is that terrorism, for example, is not limited to planes being flown into buildings or people strapping explosives onto their body and detonating them in a crowd of people. Cyber terrorism is a real threat also. And, while I am not suggesting that McKinnon is a cyber terrorist or was doing anything more than trying to find evidence of UFOs, if someone hacks into US military computer systems what are they (the US) going to do.. as I have said, rock and a hard place.


Indeed Nod Perhaps then the Americans should go to the heart of cyber terrorism and start extraditing Chinese hackers. Or would that be too difficult for them?

Myself, I doubt that extraditing Gary will send a message to anyone.
No extradition treaty with China to my knowledge. Besides a few US hackers would be shitting themselves if there was.

As for the message we are talking about it, its being reported in the news on both sides of the Atlantic as opposed to it not being mentioned at all. As tupps says there is a lot of assumption being made as to what the verdict is going to be.
CaptVimes
I can't comment on the US and any extradition agreement with China or the lack thereof.

I think it does send a message. It is a widely reported news story and particularly in I.T circles. If you did a search of some of the I.T publications I'm willing to bet they have all reported on it. Whether it would deter is another question entirely.
tupps
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by Mentalist:
quote:
Originally posted by charmer:
if the americans had any sense-they'd hire him not prosecute/persecute him


Absolutely, if he could find his way into their computer systems then he could tell them how to prevent it.


or given the trouble they are causing him he could write a how to book and publish it on the net, give them something to REALLY worry about.
They dont need him, they caught him and already know how he did it. This trial is just sending a message to future Garys.


What message would that be? Heal yourself?

One feels so powerless. One can't boycott anything American since one doesn't eat any of that fast food shieght or drink any fizzy sugary piss. One can't threaten not to vote Labour. What can one do?
So anyone with Asbergers can break any law they want then, cool. See my other post he should be tried here and any medical condition should be taken into account.


No people with Aspergers shouldn't get away with breaking the law but being Aspergers leads to often highly intelligent people showing obsessive behaviours and once something becomes fixed in their brain they carry on doing it over and over again.
Mentalist
quote:
Originally posted by Mentalist:
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by Mentalist:
quote:
Originally posted by charmer:
if the americans had any sense-they'd hire him not prosecute/persecute him


Absolutely, if he could find his way into their computer systems then he could tell them how to prevent it.


or given the trouble they are causing him he could write a how to book and publish it on the net, give them something to REALLY worry about.
They dont need him, they caught him and already know how he did it. This trial is just sending a message to future Garys.


What message would that be? Heal yourself?

One feels so powerless. One can't boycott anything American since one doesn't eat any of that fast food shieght or drink any fizzy sugary piss. One can't threaten not to vote Labour. What can one do?
So anyone with Asbergers can break any law they want then, cool. See my other post he should be tried here and any medical condition should be taken into account.


No people with Aspergers shouldn't get away with breaking the law but being Aspergers leads to often highly intelligent people showing obsessive behaviours and once something becomes fixed in their brain they carry on doing it over and over again.
As I said he should face trial and any medical problems taken into account.
CaptVimes

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×