Erin I completely agree and feel angry as hell. Why am I being questioned by Growly in the first place. The guy needs to go, no question.
i meant by ' keeping our beaks out' that the arabs need no no intervention from the west, what america thinks and what europe thinks matters not a jot, they need and are dying for self determination, i hope they succeed.
and yes the tunisian uprising was ignited by a protester setting fire to himself rather than continue to live under a dictatorship, and the protest was continued on facebook and twitter and brought about the eventual demise of ben ali ,
it must be the first technology driven revolution we have witnessed, but its not the west shoving its beak in, its the disenfranchised using a tool that has been made available to them .
in the words of some from the telly 'power to the people'
and yes the tunisian uprising was ignited by a protester setting fire to himself rather than continue to live under a dictatorship, and the protest was continued on facebook and twitter and brought about the eventual demise of ben ali ,
it must be the first technology driven revolution we have witnessed, but its not the west shoving its beak in, its the disenfranchised using a tool that has been made available to them .
in the words of some from the telly 'power to the people'
Former Member
Gaddafi will not want the world to see images of the bloodbath that is taking place under his orders.
Former Member
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Erin I completely agree and feel angry as hell. Why am I being questioned by Growly in the first place. The guy needs to go, no question.
Yes of course Gaddafi needs to go, but this needs to be done by his own people. It is not the place for us or any other country to interfere in the affairs of another state. Our invasion of Iraq brought about the death of countless thousands of innocent civilians. I hope that our current government does not have the same disregard for international law.I agree Jackson. They all have the same voice as us.
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Erin I completely agree and feel angry as hell. Why am I being questioned by Growly in the first place. The guy needs to go, no question.
you are being questioned by growly because it seemed, from your posts, that you think the solution to the problem of gadaffi is to get rid of him( which i think we all agree with) by some interference from the west, and its that interference that has caused many of the problems in the past that we now have to deal with.
We have no right to interfere....indeed the UN charter does state that a foreign force may only enter a country if that country actually asks for assistance....as Kuwait did during the first Iraq war....We had no business hanging on to the USA's coat tails in their Afghan and Iraqi adventures.
With a bit of luck Gaddafi will end up swinging from a lamp post...but the aftermath may be as bad as the present mayhem.
With a bit of luck Gaddafi will end up swinging from a lamp post...but the aftermath may be as bad as the present mayhem.
Originally Posted by Growlybear:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Erin I completely agree and feel angry as hell. Why am I being questioned by Growly in the first place. The guy needs to go, no question.
Yes of course Gaddafi needs to go, but this needs to be done by his own people. It is not the place for us or any other country to interfere in the affairs of another state. Our invasion of Iraq brought about the death of countless thousands of innocent civilians. I hope that our current government does not have the same disregard for international law.
Col.....you are being a bit idealisitic.....nothing wrong with that, but in this pragmatic world countries will, and should act in accordance with their own interests.....and breaking international law once again is not in the UK's interests. Whatever the heart feels, the head must be listened to.
Former Member
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by Growlybear:
Do you seriously think the ordinary Libyan people would welcome our army invading their country?
I'm not talking about our army going in there, but I am talking about keeping Facebook, hotmail and twitter alive so that people can talk to us and convey the carnage that is happening in the country.
Ok then - leave practical interference out of it.
But I believe people have every right to express opinions where fellow human beings are being harmed.
Don't think of it as crossing borders - think of it as all being fellow citizens of the same world.
But I believe people have every right to express opinions where fellow human beings are being harmed.
Don't think of it as crossing borders - think of it as all being fellow citizens of the same world.
Former Member
These feckers should never be propped up in the first place.
No charge
No charge
Former Member
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Col.....you are being a bit idealisitic.....nothing wrong with that, but in this pragmatic world countries will, and should act in accordance with their own interests.....and breaking international law once again is not in the UK's interests. Whatever the heart feels, the head must be listened to.
Yeah, the Saddam thing was a mess. Maybe we should take a back seat on this one untll asked Originally Posted by brisket:
Ok then - leave practical interference out of it.
But I believe people have every right to express opinions where fellow human beings are being harmed.
Don't think of it as crossing borders - think of it as all being fellow citizens of the same world.
I don't think that anyone here does not feel sympathy for the Libyan people, unfortunately that is all we can give themBut I believe people have every right to express opinions where fellow human beings are being harmed.
Don't think of it as crossing borders - think of it as all being fellow citizens of the same world.
Originally Posted by sproooot:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Col.....you are being a bit idealisitic.....nothing wrong with that, but in this pragmatic world countries will, and should act in accordance with their own interests.....and breaking international law once again is not in the UK's interests. Whatever the heart feels, the head must be listened to.
Yeah, the Saddam thing was a mess. Maybe we should take a back seat on this one untll asked
Former Member
Who plays peacemaker then?
Cause it sure as hell ain't coming from the other direction.
Cause it sure as hell ain't coming from the other direction.
Former Member
It is a very emotive subject ,I do have to say that politics of the middle east is extremely complicated,it has been since the WW1.Over the years allegiances have shifted like the sand.
Soryy, I seem to be out of cink (sp)
I do think that there is a possibility to get rid of Gadaffi especially as the people of Lybia seem to be behind the revolution.
I do think that there is a possibility to get rid of Gadaffi especially as the people of Lybia seem to be behind the revolution.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by sproooot:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Col.....you are being a bit idealisitic.....nothing wrong with that, but in this pragmatic world countries will, and should act in accordance with their own interests.....and breaking international law once again is not in the UK's interests. Whatever the heart feels, the head must be listened to.
Yeah, the Saddam thing was a mess. Maybe we should take a back seat on this one untll asked
Former Member
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Soryy, I seem to be out of cink (sp)
I do think that there is a possibility to get rid of Gadaffi especially as the people of Lybia seem to be behind the revolution.
But will we make the mess worse as has been seen to do in the near past?I do think that there is a possibility to get rid of Gadaffi especially as the people of Lybia seem to be behind the revolution.
Sprout...the UN is a toothless tiger and always has been....it's a shame and things are getting worse tonight by the looks of it
Former Member
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Sprout...the UN is a toothless tiger and always has been....it's a shame and things are getting worse tonight by the looks of it
Oh dear I haven't seen the news at this time of night. Last time I saw was about sixishOriginally Posted by velvet donkey:
Who plays peacemaker then?
Cause it sure as hell ain't coming from the other direction.
I think we are a long way from any peacemaking........and very close to all out civil war and to the victors will go the spoilsCause it sure as hell ain't coming from the other direction.
Originally Posted by sproooot:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Sprout...the UN is a toothless tiger and always has been....it's a shame and things are getting worse tonight by the looks of it
Oh dear I haven't seen the news at this time of night. Last time I saw was about sixish
I can't see Gaddaffi giving in, I fear for the Libyan people, I truly hope I'm wrong
Former Member
It's as he says prolly ...........he'll die a martyr, same as the other one
Originally Posted by sproooot:
It's as he says prolly ...........he'll die a martyr, same as the other one
I wish somebody made him a blooming martyr. The guy is dispicable, has been for 40 years. If they can sniper innocent bystanders, how dificult can it be to sniper the bastard?
Former Member
Former Member
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by sproooot:
It's as he says prolly ...........he'll die a martyr, same as the other one
I wish somebody made him a blooming martyr. The guy is dispicable, has been for 40 years. If they can sniper innocent bystanders, how dificult can it be to sniper the bastard?
Originally Posted by sproooot:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by sproooot:
It's as he says prolly ...........he'll die a martyr, same as the other one
I wish somebody made him a blooming martyr. The guy is dispicable, has been for 40 years. If they can sniper innocent bystanders, how dificult can it be to sniper the bastard?
it dont like he will go quietly. theres going to be alot of lives lost thats for sure. as i said on another thread the worlds gone mad this year. whats happening earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, uprisings, wheres this all going to end.
Under normal circumstances he would be "sectioned".
@GodTweeteth said: 'Not looking forward to Gaddafi arriving. It'll be a case of mind over martyr.'
Gaddafi can only be a martyr if his people are behind him and revere him. I think not in this case.
That's power for you - coupled with a big blob of intimidation!
The man is clearly mad to put it bluntly.
Utterly delusional, of unsound mind, unbalanced, unhinged, crazy, crackers.
If it was an ordinary citizen like me, I would be sectioned and in a psychiatric ward.
But he is still there. Blatantly lying. He now says there has been no violence.
It saddens me to think of people being killed simply because this man is bonkers.
The man is clearly mad to put it bluntly.
Utterly delusional, of unsound mind, unbalanced, unhinged, crazy, crackers.
If it was an ordinary citizen like me, I would be sectioned and in a psychiatric ward.
But he is still there. Blatantly lying. He now says there has been no violence.
It saddens me to think of people being killed simply because this man is bonkers.
Originally Posted by brisket:
But he is still there. Blatantly lying. He now says there has been no violence.
It saddens me to think of people being killed simply because this man is bonkers.
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by brisket:
But he is still there. Blatantly lying. He now says there has been no violence.
It saddens me to think of people being killed simply because this man is bonkers.
The government are considering military action ...
We have the right and a duty to prevent genocide.
A no fly zone is the least we can do.
A no fly zone is the least we can do.
I don't agree.....we haven't the power to enforce anything, since our planes and warships have been either mothballed or done away with.
We also have no right under the UN charter to interfere in another state's internal affairs...it is not our job to effect a regime change, desirable though that is.
Tony Blair was wrong to go into Iraq.....it would be equally wrong for Cameron to go into Libya
We also have no right under the UN charter to interfere in another state's internal affairs...it is not our job to effect a regime change, desirable though that is.
Tony Blair was wrong to go into Iraq.....it would be equally wrong for Cameron to go into Libya
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
2,560 online (0 members
/
2,560 guests),
0 chatting