@Baz posted:

I bet they underpay  the last guys by huge amounts

dirty toilets deserve to be underpaid though.

@*mollie* posted:

and £25 under now!

Yes, ridiculous ! The rooms weren’t great , but they weren’t dear either , so I reckon £10 under would have been fair

@*mollie* posted:

diry toilets deserve to be underpaid though.

True

@*mollie* posted:

flippen heck, you were observant spotting that.

I was busy looking at her fluffy thing round her neck.

and the other ladies top looked nice.

they both do seem to try and dress nicely

@Baz posted:

Yes, ridiculous ! The rooms weren’t great , but they weren’t dear either , so I reckon £10 under would have been fair

agree, you can't get a decent room for that price!

£10 would have been better.

blooming gameplayers

@*mollie* posted:

agree, you can't get a decent room for that price!

£10 would have been better.

blooming gameplayers

Yep

They could have turned the towel rail off

@Baz posted:

They could have turned the towel rail off

yes that would have been too easy and as we know, many like a reason to underpay

I really don’t like the big guy …he’s horrible

How could it gurgle if it’s turned off

@Baz posted:

I really don’t like the big guy …he’s horrible

yes he is a right misery

@Baz posted:

How could it gurgle if it’s turned off

@*mollie* posted:

yes he is a right misery

Isn’t he just ….I wouldn’t stay at his place

it was not worth more than the ladies paid for that room

£50 under

@Baz posted:

Isn’t he just ….I wouldn’t stay at his place

no Dames card would not be used for his place!

@Baz posted:

£50 under

@*mollie* posted:

no Dames card would not be used for his place!

No

aaaww, they lost but were nice

he only damn well won, as they were gamplayers, so he has no reason to be smug.