Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Veggieburger:
And your point is?


The fact was that however we achieved it we were still in the game until the sending off and penalty. Possession means nowt, it's goals that count as Arsenal can testify to their cost against teams in the PL
To be fair... we did exactly the same against you, hardly touched the ball with no shots on target. Yet we were shot down by the media for it
MrMincePie
Originally Posted by Veggieburger:
And your point is?


The fact was that however we achieved it we were still in the game until the sending off and penalty. Possession means nowt, it's goals that count as Arsenal can testify to their cost against teams in the PL
Just thought it was interesting that's all. Arsenal get held up as the finest passing team in the league yet last night it was like men against boys.

What does that say about our league as a whole?
disley21
It's the Champions League (used to be called European Cup). The winner goes into the next round (not semi final yet that's the last four). All these ties are played over two games. Spurs won the first one 1-0 so if there's no score in this game they go through. If Milan score it's 1-1 on aggregate so it goes to extra time. No score at the end of that it goes to penalties.

I hope that helps
Prometheus
Hmmm... not quite. If Milan score one they have an away goal too (Spurs are at home) so nobody has away goal advantage. They get five penalties each if there's no score after extra time. If it's still a draw it goes to sudden death (first team to score after the other misses goes through).

To further confuse the issue, if Milan score two they will have two away goals (advantage) so Spurs will have to score another two to win (making it 3-2).

I almost managed to confuse myself with all that
Prometheus
Originally Posted by Prometheus:
Hmmm... not quite. If Milan score one they have an away goal too (Spurs are at home) so nobody has away goal advantage. They get five penalties each if there's no score after extra time. If it's still a draw it goes to sudden death (first team to score after the other misses goes through).

To further confuse the issue, if Milan score two they will have two away goals (advantage) so Spurs will have to score another two to win (making it 3-2).

I almost managed to confuse myself with all that

Karma_
Watched the whole Barcelona Arsenal game this afternoon.
It was like watching a non-league team going to the emirates or old trafford, the gulf was that big. It could have been 8 or 9 if it wasn't for scezney and then almunia, arsenal actually defended really well at times, making crucial blocks but it really was one sided, arsenal were lucky to get 1. As for Van persie, very harsh yellow card, ive seen it happen before 1 second after the whistle - stupid. However mr van persie may have been quite lucky not to get a straight red for his first yellow.

I really dont think the sending off made a difference. Arsenals resistance at the back wore off and that wasnt down to van persie going. Like guardiola said, arsenal are a great team, but they couldnt put 3 passes together because barcelona played awesome 11v11 and awesome 11v10.
Dave Was In A Cave
Re: Arsenal I think people are making too much of Barca being all over them. Arsenal showed them far too much respect and I'd go as far as to say they were downright scared of them right from the kick off. If they treated them as equals they might have got something out of it.

Chelsea and Man U don't show Barca any respect which is why they never maul either of us. This supposed team of world class superstars can't and won't live up to the ridiculous hype surrounding them. I'm  not saying they won't win it but they have much tougher games to come. 

I was thinking about this earlier wondering why they had not foothold in the game at all and seem to remember Arsenal were scared of their own shadow last time they played Barca too and gifted Messi a hat trick by standing off him every time. I still say the sending off changed the game. 11 v 10 when you're at home with the whole stadium going radio is a huge advantage.
Prometheus
Barcelona absolutely mauled Manchester United for 80 minutes in the final the season before last. Mauled them without really getting out of 1st gear.

And how can YOU say 'supposed team of world class superstars'? There's no supposed about it, most of that team are the players who quite comfortably won the last 2 international tournaments. Infact I'm sure something like 8 of the starting 11 in the World Cup final were Barcelona.

I don't think Barcelona will win the Champions League this season, because I do kind of agree with you that a side like Chelsea will or even Inter again if they get through will find away of surviving the onslaught at the Nou Camp and exposing them in the wide areas at home when Dani Alves and Maxwell bomb forward.

But I cant and will not agree with you that their players are only supposedly world class and it's all 'hype' that their players are the best around.
Dave Was In A Cave
Of course it's not all hype but teams live in fear of them when really, they shouldn't. The infamous Ovrebo game they got ONE shot at our goal for the whole game isn't that what Arsenal were ridiculed for last night? They are beatable they are awful in defence if you can get at them, Arsenal made no attempt to get at them last night.

I don't think Inter will beat them without Mourinho. Our chances depend on which Chelsea turns up, we'll get totally mullered if the 'don't give a shit' Chelsea turn up.  Real can beat them, so can Man U if they're on form but they're a bit erratic at the moment too. I just hate that everyone thinks it's a foregone conclusion that they will win the CL based on their performance last night. They only play like that and totally dominate if you let them. We won't. Nor will Man U or Real.
Prometheus
I'm not so sure Man United can, their midfield is so poor and will get totally dominated by Barcelonas. They can maybe nick a lucky win at Old Trafford like Arsenal did at the emirates but I dont think they'd survive in the Nou Camp now and certainly arent capable of doing what chelsea did to barcelona 2 seasons ago. Even Inter last season at san siro didnt dominate barcelona like chelsea did in that game (even before barcelona were down to 10 men). Chelsea are the only team ive seen in the last few seasons that have dominated them for a whole match..


Arsenal didn't have a single shot on or off target last night.
Dave Was In A Cave
Originally Posted by Dave Was In A Cave:
I'm not so sure Man United can, their midfield is so poor and will get totally dominated by Barcelonas. They can maybe nick a lucky win at Old Trafford like Arsenal did at the emirates but I dont think they'd survive in the Nou Camp now and certainly arent capable of doing what chelsea did to barcelona 2 seasons ago. Even Inter last season at san siro didnt dominate barcelona like chelsea did in that game (even before barcelona were down to 10 men). Chelsea are the only team ive seen in the last few seasons that have dominated them for a whole match..

We're pretty much off the boil at the moment though even given the results of our last two games. Ramires will definitely cause them problems on the right if he plays. Luiz (much as I love him) will probably give them at least one penalty . It's impossible to call, at our best we can beat anyone but we haven't been at our best for a very long time.

I still Man U could trouble them. Nani will cause them problems if he hasn't had his leg amputated. Rooney in a deeper role would sort their midfield out and Berbatov I don't know why old Rednose benches him he's been their best player this year. I don't understand football managers they seem clueless which makes me think I would be quite good at it.
Prometheus
Originally Posted by Prometheus:
 I just hate that everyone thinks it's a foregone conclusion that they will win the CL based on their performance last night. 
I don't think they'll win it. I think they are by far the best team, but I don't think they will win it. I think someone will find a way of getting past them even if it's a park the 10 man bus on the 6yard line job like Inter did last season
Dave Was In A Cave
Originally Posted by Dave Was In A Cave:
Karma_ what do you prefer Van der vaart playing just off crouch or a front pairing of defoe and pavlyuchenko?
I don't know. I just saw the match and thought they played well, particularly that goal that Gabbas saved.

I'm impartial to all the ins and outs of a rats arse gubbins when it comes to football! (apart from the England games when I become a Mastermind champion and usually end up hating the ref)
Karma_
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Prometheus:
They should have eaten before the game then. Numpties.
Duh??! Then they wouldn't have been as hungry? *facepalm*

Exactly, I'd get it completely wrong which is why any PL team should be desperate to sign me up as manager. Makes terrible decisions pre-match *tick*. Knows fekk all *tick*. Leaves best players on the bench *tick*.

This management lark is a piece of cake 
Prometheus
The way berbatov plays, I honestly dont think he'd see the ball against barcelona. i think you need a more mobile, hardworking front man like chicharito who is going to move for the ball a lot more and maybe poach a goal, because if berbatov waits around for Fletcher and carrick to pass to him he'll be waiting all night against barcas midfield. Fletcher and carrick are so crap that they might as well be off the pitch while iniesta busquets and xavi are amongst them. If i was man united against barcelona id play 4-3-3 put nani on the side where dani alves is to expose them when dani alves is upfront, and rooney on the right side with chicharito down the centre.
Dave Was In A Cave
Originally Posted by Prometheus:
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Originally Posted by Prometheus:
They should have eaten before the game then. Numpties.
Duh??! Then they wouldn't have been as hungry? *facepalm*

Exactly, I'd get it completely wrong which is why any PL team should be desperate to sign me up as manager. Makes terrible decisions pre-match *tick*. Knows fekk all *tick*. Leaves best players on the bench *tick*.

This management lark is a piece of cake 
Well is that's the criteria for the role than I'd be a perfect candidate. Only problem is I'd get a bit too personal though and would end up running on the pitch and whacking the opposition with my handbag or something. The ref would almost certainly be screaming in falsetto.
Karma_
Originally Posted by Dave Was In A Cave:
The way berbatov plays, I honestly dont think he'd see the ball against barcelona. i think you need a more mobile, hardworking front man like chicharito who is going to move for the ball a lot more and maybe poach a goal, because if berbatov waits around for Fletcher and carrick to pass to him he'll be waiting all night against barcas midfield. Fletcher and carrick are so crap that they might as well be off the pitch while iniesta busquets and xavi are amongst them. If i was man united against barcelona id play 4-3-3 put nani on the side where dani alves is to expose them when dani alves is upfront, and rooney on the right side with chicharito down the centre.

Can't agree re: Berbatov. He's a 'right place right time' player which is exactly what you need against Barca as you don't get many chances and you need to put away whatever chances you get. Rooney is wasted on the wing but he's far from his best at the moment anyway I would still play him deep as he's at least intelligent and will always make the right call unlike most of their midfield.

Who do you support by the way? I'm taking a wild guess at Carlisle
Prometheus
Originally Posted by Karma_:
Only problem is I'd get a bit too personal though and would end up running on the pitch and whacking the opposition with my handbag or something. The ref would almost certainly be screaming in falsetto.

I don't see a problem there that's what we call 'hands-on' management in the football world, it is to be commended.
Prometheus

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×