Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Rawky-Roo:

Watched Mad Max: Fury Road last night.

 

An explosively fantastic action film. Absolutely wild, made even better that 90% of the special effects were practical effects. Might be a little too "out there" for some, but I thoroughly enjoyed it

 

GO WATCH!!! But not you, Renton. No emotional teenage vampires I'm afraid

Moonie
Originally Posted by Rawky-Roo:

Watched Mad Max: Fury Road last night.

 

An explosively fantastic action film. Absolutely wild, made even better that 90% of the special effects were practical effects. Might be a little too "out there" for some, but I thoroughly enjoyed it

 

GO WATCH!!! But not you, Renton. No emotional teenage vampires I'm afraid

 

The Guardian went for 80% real effects, but I'm not going to take issue with that as it would be rather pedantic, although I do enjoy a bit of pedantry now and again. 

 

Interestingly I just had a chat today with the girl in my coffee shop and she loved it. As you say ^ it's a wild rollercoaster ride of almost constant action (I saw Kermode reviewing it in the week). She was shattered by the end of it though.

 

Personally I have never been a Mad Max fan, I've never really enjoyed the post apocalyptic world, but to fully judge it I must at some point see it for myself. I suspect it's a film that works well in the cinema on a big screen with a weapons grade sound system!

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Originally Posted by moonie:

pedantic

 (pɊˈdÃĶntÉŠk)

adj
1. of, relating to, or characterized by pedantry
 
Well that really helped NOT  

 

Here you go Moonie.

 

 

pedantic
adjective
 
  1. excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous.

Ta muchly EC

Moonie
Originally Posted by Sprout:

I have a five shelf rack of DVD's I'm gonna try and watch....

 

I've just watched Black Swan......

 

I enjoyed that much more than I was expecting to. TBH it was Miss/Mrs Portman that drew me to it initially.

 

It was quite some time ago that I saw it and so to give you my deeper thoughts would need a re-watch.

 

What did you think to it Sprout?

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Sprout:

I have a five shelf rack of DVD's I'm gonna try and watch....

 

I've just watched Black Swan......

 

I enjoyed that much more than I was expecting to. TBH it was Miss/Mrs Portman that drew me to it initially.

 

It was quite some time ago that I saw it and so to give you my deeper thoughts would need a re-watch.

 

What did you think to it Sprout?

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Sprout:

I have a five shelf rack of DVD's I'm gonna try and watch....

 

I've just watched Black Swan......

Saw it at the cinema, but haven't had the chance to see it on DVD yet.

I believe there's a lot of interesting detail in there to be revealed when you use freeze-frame, e.g. during the nightclub scene...

Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Sprout:

I have a five shelf rack of DVD's I'm gonna try and watch....

 

I've just watched Black Swan......

Saw it at the cinema, but haven't had the chance to see it on DVD yet.

I believe there's a lot of interesting detail in there to be revealed when you use freeze-frame, e.g. during the nightclub scene...

Oh! I didn't do that 

FM
Originally Posted by Jen-Star:
Watched Chappie last night, it was brilliant

Yes - great film.

There does seem to be something in the water at the moment, as there have been quite a few android/AI movies recently: "Chappie", "Ex Machina", and even a re-release of "Blade Runner".

And there's that new TV series "Humans" coming soon, too...

Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Rawky-Roo:

Watched Mad Max: Fury Road last night.

 

An explosively fantastic action film. Absolutely wild, made even better that 90% of the special effects were practical effects. Might be a little too "out there" for some, but I thoroughly enjoyed it

 

GO WATCH!!! But not you, Renton. No emotional teenage vampires I'm afraid

Will you give over !!!  

 

I love The Talented Mr Ripley - not a vampire in sight 

Saint

US mathematician John Nash, whose life story was turned into the Oscar-winning film A Beautiful Mind, has died in a car crash, local media has reported.

Nash, 86, and his wife Alicia were both killed when their taxi crashed in New Jersey, the reports said.

The mathematician is renowned for his work in game theory, winning the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1994.

His breakthroughs in maths - and his struggles with schizophrenia - were the focus of the film.

Russell Crowe, who played him in the film, tweeted: "Stunned... My heart goes out to John & Alicia & family. An amazing partnership. Beautiful minds, beautiful hearts."

El Loro

 

I tuned in to the film In Time, with Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried. I liked the setup to the film and the opening half hour or so, unfortunately I fell asleep about that point (just after the scene with his mother in the street). Now I am quite excited to know if the film (no spoilers) continues to be worth the watch (assuming you liked it in the first place!).

 

Over to you. 

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

I tuned in to the film In Time, with Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried. I liked the setup to the film and the opening half hour or so, unfortunately I fell asleep about that point (just after the scene with his mother in the street). Now I am quite excited to know if the film (no spoilers) continues to be worth the watch (assuming you liked it in the first place!).

 

Over to you. 

 

 

it kinda never lives up to the good start

but go on, go on, go on

Saint
Originally Posted by Saint:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

I tuned in to the film In Time, with Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried. I liked the setup to the film and the opening half hour or so, unfortunately I fell asleep about that point (just after the scene with his mother in the street). Now I am quite excited to know if the film (no spoilers) continues to be worth the watch (assuming you liked it in the first place!).

 

Over to you. 

 

 

it kinda never lives up to the good start

but go on, go on, go on

Aww that's a bit disappointing. I will still need to finish it though.

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities

 

Just watched (on iPlayer in HD ) the film Buried. I half expected the film to be about one character in a box and that is what it pretty much turned out to be. The way the narrative progressed was through the use of his mobile phone, the people he speaks to and how he tries everything he can think of to help people find his position and ultimately rescue him. You get small insights into the company he works for and the people in his life both family and work colleagues.

 

The ending while not a shocker was a little surprising and references a discussion that took place earlier in the film. Not a bad film and not too long. If you are going to watch it on iPlayer, then you only have until tonight.

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

Just watched (on iPlayer in HD ) the film Buried. I half expected the film to be about one character in a box and that is what it pretty much turned out to be. The way the narrative progressed was through the use of his mobile phone, the people he speaks to and how he tries everything he can think of to help people find his position and ultimately rescue him. You get small insights into the company he works for and the people in his life both family and work colleagues.

 

The ending while not a shocker was a little surprising and references a discussion that took place earlier in the film. Not a bad film and not too long. If you are going to watch it on iPlayer, then you only have until tonight.

 

 

kajaki is out tomorrow

thats a good 'un

sort of the same idea, set mainly in one place

we watched it earlier, really really good...

heres a bit of the review from the telegraph

 

 

This excruciatingly tense picture is set almost entirely in a dried-out gulch near the strategically important dam, in Helmand province, which provides its name.

In 2006, a handful of British soldiers had to traverse this on a fairly routine patrol mission. They inch through cautiously, as the film has it, but not cautiously enough to stop one man, Lance Corporal Stu Hale (Benjamin O’Mahony), triggering a landmine which takes the bottom of his right leg off.

The extraction of the wounded sniper becomes a deadly case of frying pan into fire when his comrades realise to their horror that the entire riverbed is a minefield. A chopper rides in at one point, but communications falter, and it whips up so much unhelpful dust and rubble that another mine explodes. There go more legs.......

 

The film makes you flinch, recoil, hide behind your hands, and even care: a very sturdy set of achievements, and less pretentious about What We Were Even Doing There And Why than almost any Hollywood equivalent you could name

pirate1111
Last edited by pirate1111

Ah, "Buried" - as usual, I saw it a while back in the cinema, and it was responsible for one of my stranger cinema experiences. I actually saw it in a very respectable "art-house" cinema, and there weren't that many other people in the audience, but at the end some of them were screaming and shouting abuse at the screen!

 

Without going into spoiler territory: I think the problem was not so much the ending itself but rather the way it was structured, which left some feeling cheated...

Eugene's Lair
Last edited by Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:

Ah, "Buried" - as usual, I saw it a while back in the cinema, and it was responsible for one of my stranger cinema experiences. I actually saw it in a very respectable "art-house" cinema, and there weren't that many other people in the audience, but at the end some of them were screaming and shouting abuse at the screen!

 

Without going into spoiler territory: I think the problem was not so much the ending itself but rather the way it was structured, which left some feeling cheated...

 

I would not say I was pleased with the ending as pleased feels the wrong word in respect of this character's outcome, but I preferred the way it ended rather than what tends to happen which is "character gets out of situation with battle scars, is reunited with family and everyone lives happily ever after".

 

I am intrigued that the audience felt cheated. Did you feel cheated Eugene? if so, why.

 

One thing you may be able to clear up for me is why he cut off his finger, for some reason I must have drifted slightly at that point.

 

In a massive contrast, I'm just watching Bridesmaids

 

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:

Ah, "Buried" - as usual, I saw it a while back in the cinema, and it was responsible for one of my stranger cinema experiences. I actually saw it in a very respectable "art-house" cinema, and there weren't that many other people in the audience, but at the end some of them were screaming and shouting abuse at the screen!

 

Without going into spoiler territory: I think the problem was not so much the ending itself but rather the way it was structured, which left some feeling cheated...

 

I would not say I was pleased with the ending as pleased feels the wrong word in respect of this character's outcome, but I preferred the way it ended rather than what tends to happen which is "character gets out of situation with battle scars, is reunited with family and everyone lives happily ever after".

 

I am intrigued that the audience felt cheated. Did you feel cheated Eugene? if so, why.

 

One thing you may be able to clear up for me is why he cut off his finger, for some reason I must have drifted slightly at that point.

 

In a massive contrast, I'm just watching Bridesmaids

*** Spoiler Warning for anyone who's not seen "Buried" yet. ***

 

I personally wouldn't say I felt "cheated", but I was very annoyed with the way I felt they (mis-)handled the ending as up to that point I'd found the film very gripping, and I felt they dropped the ball and thus turned a potentially great film into a "gimmick" movie.

 

When I tried to discuss the ending on IMDb a lot of people thought I was complaining about it not having a happy ending, but in fact I was pleased they didn't go that way. My problem was with the "false" ending. As soon as the viewer realises he's imagined the "happy ending", you just know he's doomed, and all the intended tension over the last couple of minutes evaporates. I think that was what caused the shouting at the screen: after what had been a very clever film up to that point, the director ruined it with a ridiculous piece of melodrama. Not that a false ending can't work, of course: see the original cinematic release of "The Descent" for a textbook lesson on how to do it properly...

 

Sorry, but I can't remember about the finger: wasn't he forced to cut it off by his captors?

 

Now "Bridesmaids": that was a hoot!

Eugene's Lair
Last edited by Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:

Ah, "Buried" - as usual, I saw it a while back in the cinema, and it was responsible for one of my stranger cinema experiences. I actually saw it in a very respectable "art-house" cinema, and there weren't that many other people in the audience, but at the end some of them were screaming and shouting abuse at the screen!

 

Without going into spoiler territory: I think the problem was not so much the ending itself but rather the way it was structured, which left some feeling cheated...

 

I would not say I was pleased with the ending as pleased feels the wrong word in respect of this character's outcome, but I preferred the way it ended rather than what tends to happen which is "character gets out of situation with battle scars, is reunited with family and everyone lives happily ever after".

 

I am intrigued that the audience felt cheated. Did you feel cheated Eugene? if so, why.

 

One thing you may be able to clear up for me is why he cut off his finger, for some reason I must have drifted slightly at that point.

 

In a massive contrast, I'm just watching Bridesmaids

*** Spoiler Warning for anyone who's not seen "Buried" yet. ***

 

I personally wouldn't say I felt "cheated", but I was very annoyed with the way I felt they (mis-)handled the ending as up to that point I'd found the film very gripping, and I felt they dropped the ball and thus turned a potentially great film into a "gimmick" movie.

 

When I tried to discuss the ending on IMDb a lot of people thought I was complaining about it not having a happy ending, but in fact I was pleased they didn't go that way. My problem was with the "false" ending. As soon as the viewer realises he's imagined the "happy ending", you just know he's doomed, and all the intended tension over the last couple of minutes evaporates. I think that was what caused the shouting at the screen: after what had been a very clever film up to that point, the director ruined it with a ridiculous piece of melodrama. Not that a false ending can't work, of course: see the original cinematic release of "The Descent" for a textbook lesson on how to do it properly...

 

Sorry, but I can't remember about the finger: wasn't he forced to cut it off by his captors?

 

Now "Bridesmaids": that was a hoot!

*** Spoiler Alert ***

 

Thanks for your thoughts Eugene 

 

I actually did not think about that as I watched the film, on reflection it's an often used device by filmmakers and I think you're right that part of the film could have been left out altogether. The final twist is enough and a pretty decent twist it is IMO which ends the film.

 

I believe it was the captors who forced the finger to be cut off, but I just can't remember what led up to that moment and why he had to do it. Maybe do like you and pay a visit to IMDB and ask the question.

 

I was enjoying Bridesmaids up to the point where I fell asleep

The bit where they were sick was a bit too soon after I had my food poisoning on Monday!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by moonie:

pedantic

 (pɊˈdÃĶntÉŠk)

adj
1. of, relating to, or characterized by pedantry
 
Well that really helped NOT  

Years ago, Viz used to do a feature on pedants correcting each other

 

"It's not pedantics, it's pedants"

"It's not pedentricness, it's pendentry"

"you are not being a pedantric you are being a pedant"

"It's not "pedant's corner" it's 'pedants' corner' and so forth...

 

If you want aggressive pedantry cranked up to the absolute max, try visiting a forum on open source software.

Carnelian
Last edited by Carnelian

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×