Especially for those with loads of friends...It realy does seem as though less is more.
Especially for those with loads of friends...It realy does seem as though less is more.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I play the Mindjolt ones as well...bit of variety, even though I'm useless at most of them
why did you leave?
It was the trigger though ... I'd been toying with the idea for a while. I had a mix of RL and online friends there but most worrying was that my kids had their stepmum's family and myself as "friends". Which is fine, but I've had grief in the past from them (not that kids know) and was wary about any image of me getting into their grubby little hands.
I've since learned that you can opt not to be tagged. I think...?
*runs to FB to untag*
Saz - is that retrospective or can you elect not to be tagged in advance? There really should be a "no tagged pics until I have vetted them" option.
Then a photo caption slightly lower down says "Chaos: Teenagers on the balcony of the five-story property as police monitor the situation"
Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary anthropology at Oxford University, developed a theory in the 1990s dubbed Dunbar's Number. The theory contends that the human brain is only capable of managing relationships--staying in contact at least once per year and knowing how friends relate to others--with about 150 people.
Until recently, it was believed that that only pertained to "offline" relationships.
Dunbar has now decided to shift focus to see whether Facebook has changed the number.
It hasn't.
"The interesting thing is that you can have 1,500 friends, but when you actually look at traffic on sites, you see people maintain the same inner circle of around 150 people that we observe in the real world," Dunbar told the London-based Sunday Times. "People obviously like the kudos of having hundreds of friends but the reality is that they're unlikely to be bigger than anyone else's."
For now, Dunbar's study is in its preliminary stages, meaning more testing needs to be done. Regardless, Dunbar doesn't believe that anything will change: no matter how many thousands of friends we might have on Facebook, we can't manage relationships with more than 150 of them.
Dunbar's study will be released later this year
Oh I hear you! I only have my forum facebook for those reasons. Its not forum peeps knowing who I am in rl that bothers me.... its real life peeps knowing who I am in forum identity.
I have the kids on my friends list... and even that prompted my MIL to ask my son who Ditty Bird was... but I sorted that by blocking her!
I do want to keep the kids on my friends list... its kinda handy as an early warning when they are up to no good! (their friends are so stupid.... they know I am on their friends lists and they still post stuff that they know the kids wouldn't want me to know about)
Ditty - I may venture back at some point but with a dual profile. May do - at the moment I'm not missing it though it was nice to catch up on everyone's doings. I'm generally quite open about my online ditherings and tbh it's paid dividends as my two have a mature attitude towards anything online and accept those friends I've met online as openly as any others. In fact my son has probably spent more quality time with one of them at various test matches that he has with his father!