Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

 

I don't think it's FB at it again.....it's the media trying to twist things and wind people up again. 

 

You are in complete control of whether you announce your relationship on FB.....so therefore in control of whether you want this extra page as an extension of that, and as Rawky said, FB usually give you an option to opt out of these things. Even if they don't, all the stuff on the page can only be stuff that you've posted on your own pages anyway, so does it really matter? 

 

FB is free to use, and totally optional, so it does annoy me how the media try and portray it as something we all at the mercy of. 

 

The message thing is slightly annoying though. Good job they don't have that feature on mobile text messages! Pretending I haven't looked at my phone is how I keep dodgy members of the family at arms length!  

 

 

 

 

Ducky

Agreed Ducky, there's no law saying that you have to announce your relationship status on fb or be on fb at all for that matter! And I was q pleased to be alerted to the msg thing, I was a bit p'd off that someone, (who isn't really a big fb user) hadn't replied to a msg from nearly a week ago and now having looked I see it's because he hasn't read it yet

FM

that couples page only comes up if you click on the gear icon next to any of your friends/OH's on their profile page etc. .it's not just couples and all it shows is the interaction you and someone on your friends list have had but on one page rather than dotted all over with others interspersed. .  that's how I read it anyway [I can double check by getting in a relationship with my cat I suppose] ..  there is a friendship status page which is a  similar looking  type thing as well or it may be the same thing... . ultimately there is no loss of privacy. .

 

and FB has great advantages if your friends and family are spread far and wide, you can share so much stuff with each other together and chat together over internet etc.. naysayers should stop reading all the negative stuff and start reading some of the positives about it.. as has already been mentioned, you are in complete control of your own privacy on there and with whom you choose to share info with.. if it still isn't your cup of tea fair enough but it isn't as unsecured as half these articles make out in fact it's probably a lot more secure than forums which most of us have been posting on for years..  

Mount Olympus *Olly*

 

I have a couple or three friends who have closed their FB accounts, also found out tonight that my niece had too.

 

I am contemplating closing mine as I only go on four or five times a month.

 

I appears to me that FB are trying whatever they can to keep themselves "fresh" now that they have shareholders to satisfy. Personally I think it would not hurt for more people to close accounts.

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Supes:

This summer, Facebook made changes to its messaging system which showed other users that people had seen their messages, even if they had not replied.

I hadn't noticed that!

I like that feature....at least you know if someone just hasn't seen your message yet instead of wondering if they are just ignoring you.

Ells
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:

Yup, NOTHING you put on there is yours and EVERYTHING you put on there is theirs.

And it's nothing to do with listening to the negatives and ignoring the positives. The way sometimes FB is portrayed is as if it is the only possible way to communicate and connect to people, near or far.

for some on low incomes it is a good cheap way to share stuff with friends/family far and wide and keep in contact and see what they are up to..

 

thing is if you don't use it you can't really know exactly how insecure it really is. . you don't post/upload stuff you don't want out there.. you don't say stuff you don't want out there... it's about common sense really same as with forums..

Mount Olympus *Olly*
Originally Posted by ~Sweet Winter Wonderland~:
I can't see that link, what's the story?

Essentially, F*c*book have re-jigged their "Friendship Pages".

Now TBF, Friendship Pages have been around for a while, and are just a way of showing all interactions between you and any given friend. The main change is that there is now an automatic "Couples" page:

http://newsroom.fb.com/News/53...for-Friendship-Pages

 

Starting today, we're introducing a new layout for friendship pages. Friendship pages combine posts, photos and events that you and another person have shared. Click the gear menu at the top of a friend's timeline to see a friendship page. If you've listed yourself as "in a relationship" with someone, you can also visit facebook.com/us to see the friendship page you share with that person.

Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by Mount Olympus *Olly*:
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:

Yup, NOTHING you put on there is yours and EVERYTHING you put on there is theirs.

And it's nothing to do with listening to the negatives and ignoring the positives. The way sometimes FB is portrayed is as if it is the only possible way to communicate and connect to people, near or far.

for some on low incomes it is a good cheap way to share stuff with friends/family far and wide and keep in contact and see what they are up to..

 

thing is if you don't use it you can't really know exactly how insecure it really is. . you don't post/upload stuff you don't want out there.. you don't say stuff you don't want out there... it's about common sense really same as with forums..

That's as may be....but where do these low income people get the money to afford computers and internet access in the first place? I know there are internet cafÃĐs and library accounts, but that sort of negates the frequency and cheapness.

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
 

That's as may be....but where do these low income people get the money to afford computers and internet access in the first place? I know there are internet cafÃĐs and library accounts, but that sort of negates the frequency and cheapness.

Ohhhh, I'm glad I'm going out for the evening Fluffers, coz I expect a full scale Olly rant coming

 

... and I would agree with her

Rexi

I'm not even bothering Rexi... waste of typing time... and all of that from someone who is in the 'caring' profession if I am not mistaken

 

*goes to stoke my fire ready to cook my bread and dripping for dinner  cos with being on a low income having a cooker is probably a luxury too, as is having a PC to enable me to shop for my groceries instead of foraging for them cos I can't actually go out to get them either way.. and PC's are apparently luxuries yet every child has to do homework/schoolwork via them etc..  wanders off shaking head in despair at the ignorance of some people *

Mount Olympus *Olly*
Originally Posted by Rexi:
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
 

That's as may be....but where do these low income people get the money to afford computers and internet access in the first place? I know there are internet cafÃĐs and library accounts, but that sort of negates the frequency and cheapness.

Ohhhh, I'm glad I'm going out for the evening Fluffers, coz I expect a full scale Olly rant coming

 

... and I would agree with her

It'll be deleted I think 

 

defo shutting up now ............ in a bad mood today. .probably shows. .

Mount Olympus *Olly*
Last edited by Mount Olympus *Olly*
Originally Posted by Mount Olympus *Olly*:

 in fact it's probably a lot more secure than forums which most of us have been posting on for years..  

Definitely and it's much more private if you set your privacy settings high as I do. And you can block people, upload photos and pm for free without being a VIP Oh and remember the time on here that they accidentally gave out our personal email addresses to all and sundry? If I remember correctly by way of apology we were offered a free VIP upgrade

FM
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Mount Olympus *Olly*:
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:

Yup, NOTHING you put on there is yours and EVERYTHING you put on there is theirs.

And it's nothing to do with listening to the negatives and ignoring the positives. The way sometimes FB is portrayed is as if it is the only possible way to communicate and connect to people, near or far.

for some on low incomes it is a good cheap way to share stuff with friends/family far and wide and keep in contact and see what they are up to..

 

thing is if you don't use it you can't really know exactly how insecure it really is. . you don't post/upload stuff you don't want out there.. you don't say stuff you don't want out there... it's about common sense really same as with forums..

That's as may be....but where do these low income people get the money to afford computers and internet access in the first place? I know there are internet cafÃĐs and library accounts, but that sort of negates the frequency and cheapness.

So Fluffs, you accept that it has it's uses as stated above?  People can chose to spend what money they have on whatever they wish, for some that will be on computers/internet. Personally I'm not a big user of fb but I certainly find it one of the v useful web based means of chatting/sharing stuff with family who live abroad, and far, far cheaper than the telephone.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×