Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by guku:
5%! Eeker
What about the others? Lisa?

They won't tell us. They never do.
Even on "vote-to-evict", the %ages for the other HMs would be a big hint for future betting.
In the case of vote-to-save, it's essentially a give-away.
Indeed, I suspect one of the reasons why BB did a vote-to-save is so that they can get an accuarate "snapshot" of HM popularity... Ninja
Eugene's Lair
For completeness, Hira got 5.65% of the vote.

Now, here's the interesting bit...
Normally, BB only quotes eviction percentages to the nearest 0.1%: for example, Beinazir got 6.8% to become a housemate.
And yet, they've quoted Hira's percentage to the nearest 0.01% - why?

My theory is that that there was only a few hundredths of a percent in it: the HM with the second-lowest vote probably got something around 5.7%, and they've had to quote a more accurate figure for Hira to highlight the difference.

Just a thought...
Eugene's Lair
quote:
Originally posted by Eugene's Lair:
For completeness, Hira got 5.65% of the vote.

Now, here's the interesting bit...
Normally, BB only quotes eviction percentages to the nearest 0.1%: for example, Beinazir got 6.8% to become a housemate.
And yet, they've quoted Hira's percentage to the nearest 0.01% - why?

My theory is that that there was only a few hundredths of a percent in it: the HM with the second-lowest vote probably got something around 5.7%, and they've had to quote a more accurate figure for Hira to highlight the difference.

Just a thought...


Agreed
littleleicesterfox
quote:
Originally posted by littleleicesterfox:
quote:
Originally posted by Eugene's Lair:
For completeness, Hira got 5.65% of the vote.

Now, here's the interesting bit...
Normally, BB only quotes eviction percentages to the nearest 0.1%: for example, Beinazir got 6.8% to become a housemate.
And yet, they've quoted Hira's percentage to the nearest 0.01% - why?

My theory is that that there was only a few hundredths of a percent in it: the HM with the second-lowest vote probably got something around 5.7%, and they've had to quote a more accurate figure for Hira to highlight the difference.

Just a thought...


Agreed

Same here, it must surely have been a tiny difference in the numbers.

But hey, it means we can vote Lisa out with a record number next week! Big Grin
G

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×