we've got a sidebar already????
Me also ! What delights are in store for us today then? x
sounds like Baez just got his backside chewed again by JP for whining about evidence he should have looked at but didn't and yet again it's the States fault
He's a total plum!
Bill Sheaffer on WFTV was saying that if the State aren't careful we could have a retrial in about 3/5 years time (put that in your diary ladies) due to an appeal for incompetent counsel
How can the state help the fact that he's incompetent?
Me also ! What delights are in store for us today then? x
sounds like Baez just got his backside chewed again by JP for whining about evidence he should have looked at but didn't and yet again it's the States fault
He's a total plum!
Bill Sheaffer on WFTV was saying that if the State aren't careful we could have a retrial in about 3/5 years time (put that in your diary ladies) due to an appeal for incompetent counsel
Oh
Morning jurors, looking forward to today we must get the tart today
what do we want. THE TART
when do we want her. NOW
Me also ! What delights are in store for us today then? x
sounds like Baez just got his backside chewed again by JP for whining about evidence he should have looked at but didn't and yet again it's the States fault
He's a total plum!
Bill Sheaffer on WFTV was saying that if the State aren't careful we could have a retrial in about 3/5 years time (put that in your diary ladies) due to an appeal for incompetent counsel
Oh
Baez being the incompetent counsel that is
Morning jurors, looking forward to today we must get the tart today
what do we want. THE TART
when do we want her. NOW
she's not there today - apparently there's been a mix up about when she was suppose to attend
Morning jurors, looking forward to today we must get the tart today
what do we want. THE TART
when do we want her. NOW
Me also ! What delights are in store for us today then? x
sounds like Baez just got his backside chewed again by JP for whining about evidence he should have looked at but didn't and yet again it's the States fault
He's a total plum!
Bill Sheaffer on WFTV was saying that if the State aren't careful we could have a retrial in about 3/5 years time (put that in your diary ladies) due to an appeal for incompetent counsel
Oh
oh blimey although im enjoying this trial so much i will quite miss it when its over (thats just wrong isnt it :blush
Me also ! What delights are in store for us today then? x
sounds like Baez just got his backside chewed again by JP for whining about evidence he should have looked at but didn't and yet again it's the States fault
He's a total plum!
Bill Sheaffer on WFTV was saying that if the State aren't careful we could have a retrial in about 3/5 years time (put that in your diary ladies) due to an appeal for incompetent counsel
Oh
oh blimey although im enjoying this trial so much i will quite miss it when its over (thats just wrong isnt it :blush
So will I, Gyps, it has become addictive.
Morning jurors, looking forward to today we must get the tart today
what do we want. THE TART
when do we want her. NOW
she's not there today - apparently there's been a mix up about when she was suppose to attend
No tart well i suppose ill live in hope we at least get another member of the hammer house of horrors.
She talks fast doesnt she
oh blimey although im enjoying this trial so much i will quite miss it when its over (thats just wrong isnt it :blush
So will I, Gyps, it has become addictive.
tis sad but I'll miss it too
She talks fast doesnt she
yup she sure does wish he'd get to the point of why this witness has been called
She talks fast doesnt she
yup she sure does wish he'd get to the point of why this witness has been called
Getting to the point is not one of his talents.
ah! I wonder if she's tested to see if the car and body had been at the scene and left trace evidence????
She talks fast doesnt she
yup she sure does wish he'd get to the point of why this witness has been called
He never gets to the point
Morning jurors, looking forward to today we must get the tart today
what do we want. THE TART
when do we want her. NOW
*shakes head*
Are these witnesses meant to show that the state's testing produced a lot of negative results?
lol@ zazz
with the prosecution the witnesses were clear, consise and you could clearly see the line they were going down. It made total and utter sense, this is because, i beleive they were telling the truth, there was nothing confusing about it. Bozo is just all over the place digging in little corners with week witnesses to find any little scrap of hope. Its confusing and therefore making his points look weaker and weaker.
Are these witnesses meant to show that the state's testing produced a lot of negative results?
Yes , what about chloroform tho.....
nothing clarified there either .........
I'm so glad she came to give testimony because she confirmed that there was no drugs found in Caylee's hair sample but she also confirmed that hair is not the best indicator of drug use
Are these witnesses meant to show that the state's testing produced a lot of negative results?
yep thereby showing reasonable doubt as to Casey's motives that she didn't drug her child and kill her
nothing clarified there either .........
I know.
I'm so glad she came to give testimony because she confirmed that there was no drugs found in Caylee's hair sample but she also confirmed that hair is not the best indicator of drug use
Yes and if Caylee was drugged that day it wouldnt show up anyway.......
I'm so glad she came to give testimony because she confirmed that there was no drugs found in Caylee's hair sample but she also confirmed that hair is not the best indicator of drug use
Yes and if Caylee was drugged that day it wouldnt show up anyway.......
Sad but true.
Are you all watching it because you are just interested in it?
Or have you all got a dose of the Gypsie and now look at it as an alternative to Eastenders and Corrie?
Just curious
Are you all watching it because you are just interested in it?
Or have you all got a dose of the Gypsie and now look at it as an alternative to Eastenders and Corrie?
Just curious
I am really interested in it - although I admit it has interfered with my soap viewing.
Its a very interesting case, and i want to see justice for Caylee x
My house is a tip and lost track of the soaps !
Are you all watching it because you are just interested in it?
Or have you all got a dose of the Gypsie and now look at it as an alternative to Eastenders and Corrie?
Just curious
I am really interested in it - although I admit it has interfered with my soap viewing.
I only watch Home and away but I record any programmes I really like and watch them the following morning whilst doing the housework
Are you all watching it because you are just interested in it?
Or have you all got a dose of the Gypsie and now look at it as an alternative to Eastenders and Corrie?
Just curious
I am really interested in it - although I admit it has interfered with my soap viewing.
I only watch Home and away but I record any programmes I really like and watch them the following morning whilst doing the housework
Look at you with your organised veiwing!!
Look at you with your organised veiwing!!
no flies on me Zazz and if there are they get swatted
Gawd this is boring testimony
Gawd this is boring testimony
Why are most of the defence witnesses sooooooooooooo boring?
Had to restart the comp, i gather i havent missed much !
alternative to corrie indeed
I am interested in it because i really really really want to know the truth! I hate it when i dont know the truth, i sniff it out like a bloodhound and cant give up till i think ive got it. This case is driving me mad. I think i was enjoying it more (in a really interested way) when the prosecution were putting their case forward. Now its just a bit comedic.
Im hoping that the truth does come out in the end, or at least as near as we can get.
Gawd this is boring testimony
Why are most of the defence witnesses sooooooooooooo boring?
It's been suggested elsewhere that because Bozo has only come up with the drowning theory recently (as in the last year or so) he hasn't asked anyone to provide evidence for the theory. Half of his witnesses are State witnesses - no one that Baez has called has supported his theory of drowning.
He is just trying to blow holes in the States case and hope for a mistrial
Had to restart the comp, i gather i havent missed much !
Nope. Mind you, I think I've discovered a cure for insomnia.
This contradicts Vass,s testimony then? He said the chloroform and smell of decomposure were over powering, if i remember right............