Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Pengy:

Bill Shaeffer from WFTV said that Dr Haskell has provided pretty much damning evidence that Caylee's little body was in the car trunk for 3/5 days in the plastic bag before being dumped in the wood.  She was then dumped in the wood end of June/beginning of July 

 

Casey was driving her car around town dropping her friends here and there with her child's body in the back.  

 

I can only guess she dumped it when the smell got to be too much 

Oh dear Lord

FM
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

 Hi all, just watched the end there, before recess, will have to catch up. Judge doesnt seem his jovial self today, according to some?? Maybe Baez is starting to annoy him, he is me!

Hi Skylark. I don't blame JP if he is getting fed up with Bozo - that man would try the patience of a saint.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

Hi Yogi x
I didnt realise just how close it was to the home, that Caylee was found , Why wasnt she found sooner?

I think for a lot of the time it was under water.

Ah, thanks Soozy x   I havent read too much of the circumstances, i am going by the trial, well sort of. Trying to see it as the jury sees it x

FM
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

The prosecution and some of the expert witnesses claim that it was underwater for a lot of that time.

 

The defence dispute that and claim to have dated photographs that prove otherwise - I guess we have to wait and see.

that should be interesting Soozy 

 

 

Afternoon Skylark 

Thanks Soozy, Hi Pengy  x

FM
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

Thats it for today.
Yes Soozy, she looked at Caylee,s bedroom no problem, but trees and stuff she looked away. obviously trying to look disgusted that someone could dump her daughter,s body there . Well in my opinion x

Maybe simply trying to leave the image with the jury of a poor, distraught, bereaved, victim.

Soozy Woo
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

Hi Yogi x
I didnt realise just how close it was to the home, that Caylee was found , Why wasnt she found sooner?

Hiya all

 

 

Yes the area where the remains were discovered had been searched before, not sure how thorough as nothing was found to be there then due to that area being swamped. (you would think they would have searched it thoroughly) Not sure how thoroughly they did this search previously.

  The defence are possibly going to show how the remains were found when Casey was in jail, so she could not have possibly put the body in this place, and therefore someone else was involved. Anyway we will see how it pans out when the Defence take the case in chief.

Still a lot of unanswered questions.

Ev (Peachy)
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

Hi Ev, where can i find the Defences opening statements? i missed the beginning of the trial and would like to hear it x YouTube, maybe ?

Thanks for that, by the way x

No problem, it will be good if we all had a magic ball to see exactly how and why things took place, wouldn't it ?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5k0Xs5972DY  < This is the you tube one, but will pass on some more.

Ev (Peachy)

Defense: Opening Statements

The defense’s lead attorney, Jose Baez, wasted no time explaining that the reason Casey did not report her daughter missing during those 31 days is because her daughter was not missing, she accidentally drowned on June 16th, 2008. The defense claimed that on June 16th Caylee and Casey were at home with George Anthony, grandfather and father, respectively. While George and Casey were talking, George noticed Caylee was not around. They set about looking for Caylee outside and George found her lifeless body in the pool, pulling her out. The defense implied that George helped Casey cover up the accidental death, and then later tried to distance himself from the incident, setting out to let Casey take the fall.


The defense shocked everyone with allegations that George Anthony molested his daughter since the age of eight, and later on her older brother, Lee, molested her as well. Mr. Baez insinuated that one of them might be Caylee’s father. The defense explained that Casey learned to lie and use denial to cope with the molestation by her father and brother, and that these same skills of lying and denial are what she used to deal with Caylee’s accidental death. This is why, the defense claims, that Casey did not report her daughter’s death and why she was able to go on with her life, partying at nightclubs with friends, during those 31 days.

The defense claims that the man who found Caylee, Roy Kronk, had ulterior motives – he wanted to be the one to find Caylee’s remains for fame and money. Jose Baez, the defense attorney, claimed that Mr. Kronk placed Caylee’s remains in the woods, just 20 feet from the street, a block or two away from where Casey lived.

However, the defense did not explain how or where Roy Kronk originally found Caylee’s remains and why he would move them to the woods near Casey’s house. I suppose if he had wanted to claim the reward for finding Caylee, he could have called the police from the original spot where he found Caylee, where supposedly George and Casey Anthony disposed of Caylee, and still claim the reward.

The defense are looking to give the jurors ‘reasonable doubt‘ upon which to find Casey not guilty.

 

The defence have yet to explain things, and no doubt they will try *ninja*  when they are in the chief position soon.

 

 

 

 

Ev (Peachy)
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

Thanks Ev, i am doing everything backwards in this trial  I am REALLY trying to keep an open mind, not easy !

Its so bloody hard to do that isn't it Skylark

 

I find it extremely hard, but i always say (even though ive voiced my views so far on what i think happened) i will still try keep an open mind until everything has been put forward in court.

 

 

Ev (Peachy)

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×