Originally Posted by Scotty:
Originally Posted by Ev (Peachy):
Originally Posted by Scotty:
Even if George lied about having an affair with her and she lied about having an affair with him, then changed her mind - none of it is important in the grand scheme of things.
The important thing is the defence are honing in on her claim that George only said "It was an accident that snowballed out of control."
As if he knew and was involved in the cover up.
Jeff made her read her statement re that in full.
George also said " I really believe it was an accident that went wrong and Casey tried to cover it up."
Big difference.
True. I would love to know how the Jury view this situation, and her full testimony.
I think the jury will be dismiss their "affair" and her testimony as unimportant really.
Jeff successfully refuted her signed statement in front of them.
I also think the Jury thinks George may be a liar like his daughter, and im not sure what impact it will have on the jury. If they leave everything here say out, and focus on the FACTS, they may well come to conclusion that there was no murder weapon, no DNA, the murder weapon the state says is the duct tape was contaminated by the FBI. The rest there is no PROOF. Even if it looks blindingly obvious Casey did it, they will get down to the niitty gritty, and say well.. we think there is a strong possibly Casey killed her daughter, but there is no proof. Its a toughie, and i can only imagine the way they will find her.
I would put money on a lesser offence, even manslaughter and the child neglect etc.. Just my opinion.