Skip to main content

They are having a short recess, during which the defence are objecting to some videos that the proscecution want to show.

The defence believe the videos could be seen as implying "bad character and lack of remorse".

The proscecution believe they show Casey's demeanour during June/ July 2008 (when she claimed her daughter was missing).

Yogi19

Hi all  

 

I want to concentrate on the trial so won`t be posting today...just popping in quickly with this for you...

 

This live link to the trial also has mini screen at the bottom of the video that focuses on Casey.

 

http://www.wesh.com/casey-anth...age/interactive.html

 

It has chat area ( people commenting) to the right of the video. It has a clicking sound though, so if you want to switch it off just follow the instructions. 

 

Bye the noo   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scotty
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

Can i ask ......there was a delay, i believe, between the day Caylee went missing and when she was officially reported missing, is that right? Plus has this delay been explained ? Thanks

I think it was 32 days she was missing sky before she was reported missing..

 

Thanks Scotty I will have a nose at that one, I like the ones with interaction with them....

stonks
Originally Posted by stonks:
Originally Posted by Skylark24:

Can i ask ......there was a delay, i believe, between the day Caylee went missing and when she was officially reported missing, is that right? Plus has this delay been explained ? Thanks

I think it was 32 days she was missing sky before she was reported missing..

 

Thanks Scotty I will have a nose at that one, I like the ones with interaction with them....

Thanks x

FM

Hi Skylark, Casey failed to report Caylee missing for over a month. She initially told police she was looking for the child by herself. She also said the child had been kidnapped by her nanny. None of this was true.

The prosecution are showing, through witness statements and videos, that she actually spent that month, shopping, socialising and partying.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Hi Skylark, Casey failed to report Caylee missing for over a month. She initially told police she was looking for the child by herself. She also said the child had been kidnapped by her nanny. None of this was true.

The prosecution are showing, through witness statements and videos, that she actually spent that month, shopping, socialising and partying.

Thanks Yogi x  

FM
Originally Posted by Veggieburger:

I'm confused. She told people she worked at Universal but she hadn't for 2 years. is that right?

How the hell was she affording to live/shop and keep a kiddie then?

Yes, she did lie about the job, Veggie.

I asked the same question about how she always seemed to have cash. Someone said she stole cash from her grandfather and her dad and there were some forged cheques, too.

Yogi19

Just had to pop back in..I can`t help myself  

 

The shopping you`re seeing Casey buying was bought with stolen cheques. She stole her friend Amy`s cheque book. (she was found guilty on this just before she was charged with murder) The jury don`t know this though. 

 

Veggie, she funded her life by stealing from her parents/grandparent`s bank accounts -thousands of dollars. She also borrowed from here, there and everywhere and never paid it back. 

Scotty

I noticed during the defence's cross-examination of witnesses today, Bozo repeatedly used the phrase "the world in which Casey was living". I think the defence team will suggest that due to the trauma of Caylee's accidental drowning (and being forced by her father to cover it up), Casey erased Caylee's death from her mind and was then able to function normally and show no signs of grief.

The accidental drowning and George's part in the cover up are the defence theory.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Scotty:

Just had to pop back in..I can`t help myself  

 

The shopping you`re seeing Casey buying was bought with stolen cheques. She stole her friend Amy`s cheque book. (she was found guilty on this just before she was charged with murder) The jury don`t know this though. 

 

Veggie, she funded her life by stealing from her parents/grandparent`s bank accounts -thousands of dollars. She also borrowed from here, there and everywhere and never paid it back. 

Thanks Scotty, I knew it was something to do with stolen cash and forged cheques.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Scotty:

Veggie, she funded her life by stealing from her parents/grandparent`s bank accounts -thousands of dollars. She also borrowed from here, there and everywhere and never paid it back. 

Thanks Scotty - something very wrong all round with this whole thing even without the disappearance of the little girl

FM
Originally Posted by Roxan:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

I was looking at some photographs last night - they did look really close and loving.

 

This is a very odd case indeed!

It is, Soozy.

Perhaps Caylee's death was accidental, but that doesn't explain Casey's subsequent behaviour.


I ws thinking about this last night. If the death was accidenta, even given her behaviour in the subsequent 31 dyas, then she has had some TERRIBLE advice from her attourneys and more to the point I dont understand her defence at the bail hearing.

I didn't read anything about the bail hearing, what did the defence do?

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Roxan:
Originally Posted by Scotty:

 

Alternates are jury members who sit in throughout the trial. There are 5 alternates and 12 main jury members in this case. If a main jury member becomes ill or has to leave for some reason..an alternate replaces them and becomes part of the main 12. When the jury go into deliberations at the end of the trial, the alternates are not involved. Only the main 12 decide the outcome. 

 

 

Can I just add to thisd that of the 17 jury members there, (12 full + 5 alternates) none of them know if they are a jury member or an alternate to prevent people from not paying full attention to the evidence.

That makes absolute sense to me - it's a good idea. I think we should do something similar in the UK (for expected long drawn out cases).

Soozy Woo

haahahhaaaaaa

 

just logged in.

 

I have put myself on here as what???

 

 

 

Omg FFS ROTFL

 

 

We all could have sworn that was YOU!!   hheheeeeeeee

 

I posted that as you had targeted my post and made it all about you!  YOU accused me  of something,    friggg,  i didnt know we were viewing the Scotty Anthony case 

 

 

Best laugh of the day , thanks for that

Sorry just wish i could discuss the case with you today but not at home, just HAD to reply.

Ok what i said about not replying coz it will go tits up is off

 

Although i wont be able to post anymore tonight as im off out and not home till very later.

 

 

I wish i had the Knowledge book of the Holy Grail

 

Its dog-eared at the Chapter " Its all about me", and " Who gives a shit"

 

lol

 

I mean even if you have paranoid tendencies, its a fool who would let them show on here 

 

 

 

*Gawd wish i could post smilies from this pc* lol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ev (Peachy)
Last edited by Ev (Peachy)
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Ev (Peachy):

Wooooo top of the page!  A new one, go me!

 

Leaders logging in 

 

 

Evening all *waves*   Will be back tomorrow 

tOP  of the page cos there are a lot of folk watching! Who are the leaders? It's an interesting case..................... 


It was in reference to me being accused of putting myself in charge here Soozy

 

Anyway have a good evening, Im off out

 

hugs

Ev (Peachy)
Originally Posted by Syd:

Chill.............


I would like to

 

I dont wish to be accused that my posts are directed at someone, and then be told im acting as a leader of kinds.

Sorry i had to post the obvious in my post just up there, and i know i shouldnt, but i was targeted and responded

 

I should have not done so, yes sensibly, as normally i walk away

 

 

Syd

Ev (Peachy)

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×