Skip to main content

this just posted on facebook

<h6 class="uiStreamMessage" data-ft="{"type":1}">Numerous reports of motion filed circulating. We have crews standing by at the clerk of courts office. No new motion has been filed with the clerk of courts office, although the judge may have a new motion. We will keep you updated.</h6>
FM
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Pengy:

A death-qualified jury is a jury in a criminal law case in the United States in which the death penalty is a prospective sentence. Such a jury will be composed of jurors who: 1. Are not categorically opposed to the imposition of capital punishment;
2. Are not of the belief that the death penalty must be imposed in all instances of capital murder—that is, they would consider life imprisonment as a possible penalty.

 

 

from FB 

Thanks Pengy.

also 

 

 A death qualified jury can render a guilty verdict and then go back and decide if she should be put to death. This is done so that a new jury does not have to come in a rehear all the evidence in order to determine her sentence.

 

 

American posters scare me on FB they seriously have the needle in her arm already 

FM
Originally Posted by Gypsie~:

this just posted on facebook

<h6 class="uiStreamMessage" data-ft="{"type":1}">Numerous reports of motion filed circulating. We have crews standing by at the clerk of courts office. No new motion has been filed with the clerk of courts office, although the judge may have a new motion. We will keep you updated.</h6>

I read that at screws 

FM

How on earth the defense team is thinking they are ever going to get her off this is a joke.

 

First of all, they dont deliver on the statements they made at the very start, the whole basis of their case, that she was sexually abused. then they try to sneak witnesses in the back door. Now they are seen trying to get her declared mental..   HOW is this any way to prove she is innocent.

FM
Originally Posted by Gypsie~:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

I MISSED IT - Can someone briefly tell me? Bloody husband and his cup of tea!

that business on sat was her defence claiming she was mad, the court appointed 3 expert doctors, all said she was not mad. Therefore the trial continues as normal

She's not mad, just bad.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

This is what I don`t understand Yogi. In their opening statement they said she behaved and lied like she did because of "sexual abuse." ( I don`t believe it)  Surely, they should have used that to her advantage? 

 

You would have thought so.

I would take it that the psychiatrist didn't agree with their theory of sex abuse and saw her for what she is a manipulative liar   or did they use a less qualified psychologist who again didn't give them the information that they wanted???? 

One or the other Pengy.   

Scotty
Originally Posted by Gypsie~:

How on earth the defense team is thinking they are ever going to get her off this is a joke.

 

First of all, they dont deliver on the statements they made at the very start, the whole basis of their case, that she was sexually abused. then they try to sneak witnesses in the back door. Now they are seen trying to get her declared mental..   HOW is this any way to prove she is innocent.

The jury don't know about that though.

Yogi19

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×