After the randomness of Rodrigo coming 5th and David 3rd, I'd be interested to see how close it was.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
*** waits for darlo ***
I think Sophie got 74% of the winners vote.
Nah! and I don't care actually.
Sophie - 74.4%
Siavash - 25.6%
David - 19%
Charlie - 13.2%
Rodrigo - 11%
Siavash - 25.6%
David - 19%
Charlie - 13.2%
Rodrigo - 11%
I posted this in another thread:
************************
Rodrigo = 11% out of 5;
Charlie = 13.2% out of 4*;
David = 19% out of 3;
Siavash = 25.6% out of 2;
Sophie = 74.4% out of 2
[Note: I'm assuming Charlie's percentage was based on a 4-way, but Wiki is claiming it's based on the 5-way cut.]
Based on the above, I think ( ) the following is the "corrected" percentages for a 5-way split:
Rodrigo = 11%;
Charlie = 11.7%;
David = 14.7%;
Siavash = 16%;
Sophie = 46.6%
So if correct: it was remarkably close between Rod and Charlie, and between David and Siavash.
************************
Since posting this, BB Online have posted something very similar (with just slight rounding differences), so it looks like my assumption re Charlie was correct (and Wiki's wrong )
************************
Rodrigo = 11% out of 5;
Charlie = 13.2% out of 4*;
David = 19% out of 3;
Siavash = 25.6% out of 2;
Sophie = 74.4% out of 2
[Note: I'm assuming Charlie's percentage was based on a 4-way, but Wiki is claiming it's based on the 5-way cut.]
Based on the above, I think ( ) the following is the "corrected" percentages for a 5-way split:
Rodrigo = 11%;
Charlie = 11.7%;
David = 14.7%;
Siavash = 16%;
Sophie = 46.6%
So if correct: it was remarkably close between Rod and Charlie, and between David and Siavash.
************************
Since posting this, BB Online have posted something very similar (with just slight rounding differences), so it looks like my assumption re Charlie was correct (and Wiki's wrong )
OMG, I must be living in a parallel universe, I cannot understand how Sophie got so many votes. Unless they were from a betting ring. I need to take a reality check.
quote:Originally posted by vrmaryport:
OMG, I must be living in a parallel universe, I cannot understand how Sophie got so many votes. Unless they were from a betting ring. I need to take a reality check.
Actually, her "corrected" %age (46.6% - see my previous post) is pretty close to what was being predicted on the ThisIsBigBrother and BB Online polls. (Only DS was completely out of step, as they had Siavash to win.)
The real question is "Why was Siavash's %age so low?". I think the answer is that Rod, Charlie and David all got higher %ages initially than expected (ignoring for now the fact that no-one predicted their eviction order correctly). When they were evicted, it's likely that their support transferred to Sophie rather than Siavash. This would explain why the "corrected" %ages for David and Siavash are so close: David did well, but I simply don't believe he came that close to being runner-up...
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
241 online (1 member
/
240 guests),
0 chatting