Skip to main content

I'm gonna say this and then I;m logging out for the night.



There are people here who disagree with each other from time to time and have their spats ........................sometimes it gets heated but - that's just how it is and generally there are no hatd feelings.



Then ............there are really nasty feckers who have a superiority complex and feel that they have the right to say nasty, horrible stuffand then wonder why they have a lifetime ban.



I think there is more behind this thread than meets the eyes TBH ..............don't like it,

You seem fairly bitter about something that is a general suggestion Soozy, even hinting there are mysterious plots underlying a thread which was posted by one of the most kind and genuine posters on the forum. What exactly are you implying?

Surely the whole point is to have an open system for moderation that is not controlled by button pressers and hearsay hinters, and is also capable of giving ALL parties a chance of putting their case.  The view of many people is that the current system could be better - no more, no less.  

Your abuse of unnamed 'nasty feckers' who have presumably annoyed you does nothing to bring balance or open discussion to this thread.  Nobody is suggesting that people should do as they like.  All people are saying is democracy is best served by transparency - isn't it?  The various suggestions about sin bins and 'x strikes and you're out' all have merit  and should be discussed.  Accusations about the motives of a very nice FM do not help and are unkind, hurtful and unfair.  

It would be nice if you could withdraw your remarks this morning.  If you do I will withdraw the quote.
Tooth Fairy
In defence of Soozys remarks about nasty fekkers: I have to say that because we have the lifetime ban/IP ban or whatever Lori and co use it has been somewhat mellow here overall for quite a while but a look in the troll tank would remind anyone of how unpleasant forums can get.
Most of the old fms aren't here not because of being banned but because they now have other stuff they're into or hang around on FB. Allowing people who are banned to come back in order to add to the mix or make the place busier won't work imo. The majority of  people that will come racing back will be people looking to settle old scores and chaos will ensue.
And I say that as someone who has online friends who have been banned from here
FM
I think the length should depend on why they were banned. Most have said if it was a 3 strikes rule then someone could be banned for life for posting silly pictures etc. Also it shouldn't depend on the volume hitting the report button. The majority are not always right. 

I know we have mods here and mostly they do a great job but in some ways I think as we are all adults we should have some sort of self moderation. Nobody is forced to respond to anyone they think is a WUM or troll. Nobody is forced to retaliate if someone has a  go. I fall out with people all the time but I'd hate to be banned simply for having a differing opinion and a resulting heated discussion. A lot of what has gone on here is nothing more than old grudges. People not willing to let things lie and in the process it consumes their online life. Lifes too short.....IMO
Cagney
Same here 

I don't doubt MOST people do self moderate but there are some who don't and allow themselves to be wound up time and time again rather than step away from a situation. Especially when they are fully aware and post to confirm that they knew it would be the same old same old and should never have replied....and never will again....until the next time. 
Cagney
Seems to me that the 'time should fit the crime' but then, additionally, take into account both any 'past offences' and any serious provocation. (Life does seem like a v v long time 'though and, imho, probably only fitting for those who repeatedly come in and cause trouble/launch serious personal attacks.)
I guess that Lori and co. have better things to do than to spend forever watching out for 'repeat offenders' and those who come back time and time again with new ids, only to repeat the behaviour that they got banned for in the first place, or to get into lengthy 'he said' 'she said' debates about who is in the wrong.
Also, I'm not sure that anyone from GaGa has ever suggested that the moderation decisions on here are 'transparent' or this is a 'democracy.' Whether folk like it or not, they decided the 'punishment' and it's not open for discussion. As far as I can see these are the rules:
  • Remember that not every new user is someone you've seen before. Let's not immediately jump to conclusions. Not everyone that registers is that guy ... you know ... that guy?
  • If you see a person that you suspect is a previously-banned user, report it and move along. Don't call them out, don't jump right to the attack, just report it and be done with it.
  • Remember that not every user has or cares about a history on C4. That was C4, this is not C4. We don't care what went on there. You shouldn't either.
  • Do not feed the Trolls. You don't need to rush into every argument on the forums. If you are a member that seems to be involved in a lot of arguments here, be warned: you may be banned. Moderators will not be spending time refereeing or evaluating who is right and who is wrong. They will be looking for and banning people that are repeatedly involved in disturbances.
  • Leave your troubles behind. Arguments that started somewhere else should stay somewhere else. If you drag an argument from someplace else to these forums you will be banned.
  • Leave your flamethrower behind. If you're here just to create problems and cause grief for other users, your time here will be short.
  • But do bring your asbestos underwear. People here have very strong opinions. They don't necessarily agree with you. Get over it. It's not personal. If it becomes personal, report it and move on, but don't feed the Troll or, as stated above, you'll get yourself banned.
  • We don't read every post, every topic. Don't assume that we know that Harry has been picking on Sally all week. Tell us. Then don't jump into the fray, just move on to another topic.
  • Think before you post. Are you posting to the right person? In the right Forum? Did you spell the name properly? Are you sure this is what you want to say? Don't start an argumentative or provocative topic, then ask the moderator to clean up your mess.
  • The Troll Tank is where examples of bad behavior go. Topics that are moved there, or placed there and closed are examples of what NOT to do.
FM
Reference:
That's the first time I've ever read the rules Supes
...It took me a while to find them!...There may be more, elsewhere, but if so I don't know where they are!
EDIT: there are some somewhere as I recall: no nudity, no foul language etc. but i don't know where they are any more
FM
Last edited by Former Member
quote:
Reference:
Remember that not every new user is someone you've seen before. Let's not immediately jump to conclusions.
Not everyone that registers is that guy ... you know ... that guy?



which guy? 



The one he usually is silly!

I thought all the folk her knew that! tsk!
Croctacus
I think that if someone is banned for launching extremely personal and insulting attacks on an FM,  then they should not be allowed back.  Ever.

In the past I have seen a couple of contributors to this thread being subjected to what must have been deeply wounding verbal attacks and I feel they have a right to express their concerns.  Just my opinion
FM
Reference:
That's the first time I've ever read the rules Supes
...It took me a while to find them!...There may be more, elsewhere, but if so I don't know where they are!
EDIT: there are some somewhere as I recall: no nudity, no foul language etc. but i don't know where they are any more


I think that no nudity should be compulsory.  The thought of FMs sitting round in their skivvies or less while they are posting makes me feel quite poorly 
Tooth Fairy
Stonks, that third smiley you have put, (slamming the hand down,) is hilarious!  I can't find it on here though.  But there are some that I can't seem to access.

Re the banning thing; it is easy to get wound up, and I have done a couple of times.  And it's easy to get irritated if there's someone who pisses you off.  But you have to stay constructive and cool headed and not get personal, or leave the thread if you don't agree with the person or don't like them.   It's kind of hard to do, but a necessary evil...    In addition, I have had a few snide remarks from a couple of people which I felt were unnecessary, but I have given a few back to too .. (not necessarily to the ones who gave them me...)  so none of us are perfect.

There hasn't been anything really nasty though - from me or towards me, and sometimes, remarks 'can' be misconstrued.  So it's best to just ignore anything you see as baiting or flaming, or even just a bit rude....  and then the argument/issue can't continue...  I have actually said a couple of things that were really innocent, and have been attacked, but then I am also guilty of being a bit snide when someone didn't deserve it on that particular occasion.  When it goes to nasty personal insults, it's not on though. 
But I definately don't agree with a lifetime ban, and I think a forum amnesty would be nice, as someone suggested... for previous banned members to all be given a chance.  And for the existing members who are here (and have never been banned for life,) to give them a chance to start afresh.  As someone pointed out in the thread earlier, and Dave said in his thread..  people have a tendency to attack anyone new, assuming they are someone else who they perhaps once fell out with. 

A complete clean slate and total amnesty, with no snide remarks about past history/past arguments would be nice. 
FM
what's the verdict then

I am guessing the reasonable people want other people to have a chance and prove they are reasonable as well - so they are leaning towards a 'give peace a chance' philosophy.

Other people are saying let everyone have a chance except for the person who really pissed me off because they should stay banned forever - or even a bit longer.

And of course unreasonable people will be saying 'ban everyone except my closest chums' because we are all nice and the rest are all nasty.

So no change really


Tooth Fairy
what's the verdict then

I am guessing the reasonable people want other people to have a chance and prove they are reasonable as well - so they are leaning towards a 'give peace a chance' philosophy.

Other people are saying let everyone have a chance except for the person who really pissed me off because they should stay banned forever - or even a bit longer.

And of course unreasonable people will be saying 'ban everyone except my closest chums' because we are all nice and the rest are all nasty.

So no change really"



I've thought long & hard about this and only see one solution....ban the mods!
zazz
Hi All  I really had made up my mind not to come back into this thread it has been a nice civil thread everyone was giving their opinions without being nasty and personal, but I wont be baited into an arguement with anyone my reason for giving this thread  miss a now, but  had to come in and thank those  have said lovely and very generous about me, Thank you 
Marguerita

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×