Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by paace:
Where the welfare of children are concerned money should not be the deciding factor.
I would not put those children with the Jackson clan either a totally creepy bunch . I'm sure there must be loving foster parents who would bring those children up away from the madness surrounding the Jackson clan.



Well that's never gonna happen is it? They were born to a Jackson ....there are plenty of other Jackson offspring - I think their live are probably a lot better than many kids TBH.
Soozy Woo
quote:
Originally posted by Soozy woo:
quote:
Originally posted by paace:
Where the welfare of children are concerned money should not be the deciding factor.
I would not put those children with the Jackson clan either a totally creepy bunch . I'm sure there must be loving foster parents who would bring those children up away from the madness surrounding the Jackson clan.



Well that's never gonna happen is it? They were born to a Jackson ....there are plenty of other Jackson offspring - I think their live are probably a lot better than many kids TBH.


I don't believe for a sec Michael Jackson is their biological father. The only way to prove it is through DNA. I don't believe their lives will be better with any of the Jacksons, least of all if the grandad has his way.
P
quote:
Originally posted by pigeonpie:
Too right, and he's the only daddy they've had! Thumbs Up
But I'm scared by Joe Jacksons comments that he wants them to be entertainer's, history repeated again! Frowner


Yeah he is the one and only dad to them. And Joe Jackson wont get anywhere near them to bully them into performing like he did with Michael. Katherine would stop him
R
I imagine there's almost nothing more powerful than a Jackson lawyer.

Some reports even say MJ stopped making payments to her.

You can't judge this woman. You don't know the full story of how powerful the Jacksons could be.

Remember, MJ didn't even adopt these children, so, legally, they weren't his.

They're nobody's children. How are they going to feel when they are older and don't belong to anybody? Particularly when grandma Jackson is no more.
jennywren
quote:
Originally posted by Soozy woo:
quote:
Originally posted by paace:
Where the welfare of children are concerned money should not be the deciding factor.
I would not put those children with the Jackson clan either a totally creepy bunch . I'm sure there must be loving foster parents who would bring those children up away from the madness surrounding the Jackson clan.



Well that's never gonna happen is it? They were born to a Jackson ....there are plenty of other Jackson offspring - I think their live are probably a lot better than many kids TBH.


I doubt it.
jennywren
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:

Remember, MJ didn't even adopt these children, so, legally, they weren't his.

They're nobody's children. How are they going to feel when they are older and don't belong to anybody? Particularly when grandma Jackson is no more.


I think that the law is that the father is "presumed" to be the husband of the mother. Therefore as Jacko was married to Debbie Rowe at the time of their births he is legally recognised as their father even if conceived via a sperm donor.

So no adoption process would have been required.
HH
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:
quote:
Originally posted by Roxi:
Those kids are Michael Jackson's kids


No, they weren't. He never adopted them and they weren't his biologically.



But he is the only father they've ever known ..........I'm in no doubt that he loved them very dearly and it certainly looked like they loved him.

It may have been a strange relationship to all of us but the Jacksons aren't 'normal'.

There are things other than sperm or legal papers that go to making a father. Love is more important than anything IMO.
Soozy Woo
quote:
Originally posted by Kris Is Bliss:
excuse me but it's in THE SUN !!! Roll Eyes

quote:
THE mum of Jacko's two eldest kids has been bought off to drop her bid to get custody of the pair, it was claimed today.


Translated: It's BS but we'll print it anyway.


When I clicked the link and saw it was the Sun these were some of my thoughts as well. If a statement is released by any lawyers, either side if necessary, then what they say is more believable than "a source said"
Yellow Rose
quote:
Originally posted by Roxi:
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:

No, they weren't. He never adopted them and they weren't his biologically.


They are his kids they were made by his own sperm. He said on the Bashir interview he had sex with Debbie Rowe. And he had his sperm used for the mystery mother to Blanket


Those children are not the product of his sperm.
jennywren

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×