Skip to main content

Sprout posted:
Rocking Ros posted:
Sprout posted:
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Sprout posted:

Possibility I'll have contract extended Wozzer   other than the other person that's tryna muscle in on my job   

 

thought she was a goner 

Tomorrow is the verdict day, as far as I know    Agency setting things in motion, will speak when I have more 

how come someone is after your job -are they from the same agency???

Yup, but not concentrating on what she should be doing   It's got to the point where I could shout you keep your mind on your job and let me keep my mind on mine 

Pissing a lot of us off Wozzer 

sounds a night mare sprooty

Rocking Ros Rose
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Sprout posted:

Yeah, but it's only an extension, rather than being kept on (employed by NPS), although I'm obviously grateful for anything I can get  

 

you don't know what will happen after this extension and while you're employed you really should be applying for other stuff...it's much easier to get a job in employment than not 

I know what you're saying 

FM
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Rocking Ros posted:

 the longer you are there sprooty the more chance of being taken  permenantly on I would have thought

 

agency work in this type of work is crap Ros....I can never understand a firm paying extra to an agency, rather than giving the person doing the work a fair rate of pay 

Yep, it's madness ....do it in the NHS too.... 

Baz
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Rocking Ros posted:

 the longer you are there sprooty the more chance of being taken  permenantly on I would have thought

 

agency work in this type of work is crap Ros....I can never understand a firm paying extra to an agency, rather than giving the person doing the work a fair rate of pay 

I am the same dameee -luckily I don't want  a permanent job but not fair to peeps who do - agency would charge the school ÂĢ2000 pounds if they  wanted to keep a teacher  on in the school from an agency

Rocking Ros Rose
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Sprout posted:

I know what you're saying 

 

the older you get you have no chance, they have raised the pension age for women knowing they are in the highest category least likely to find employment because of children, retraining etc...those with not enough stamps on have no chance. 

And what they don't take in to account is people like me, who have no dependants and think we're are over the hill. To my mind, it's people like me they should be employing to train the next generation to take over when we retire, but this friggin government just don't see it that way!

To me, age is experience 

FM
Sprout posted:
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Sprout posted:

I know what you're saying 

 

the older you get you have no chance, they have raised the pension age for women knowing they are in the highest category least likely to find employment because of children, retraining etc...those with not enough stamps on have no chance. 

And what they don't take in to account is people like me, who have no dependants and think we're are over the hill. To my mind, it's people like me they should be employing to train the next generation to take over when we retire, but this friggin government just don't see it that way!

To me, age is experience 

 

Baz
Sprout posted:

And what they don't take in to account is people like me, who have no dependants and think we're are over the hill. To my mind, it's people like me they should be employing to train the next generation to take over when we retire, but this friggin government just don't see it that way!

To me, age is experience 

 

swings and roundabouts Pam...lot of young ones have no chance of getting a decent job or buying a house, I really would hate to be starting out now. 

Dame_Ann_Average
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Rocking Ros posted:

I am the same dameee -luckily I don't want  a permanent job but not fair to peeps who do - agency would charge the school ÂĢ2000 pounds if they  wanted to keep a teacher  on in the school from an agency

 

disgusting Ros, things like this need to be stopped..but not likely at the minute 

true  it suits  mebut feel sorry for the young ones 

Rocking Ros Rose
Dame_Ann_Average posted:
Sprout posted:

And what they don't take in to account is people like me, who have no dependants and think we're are over the hill. To my mind, it's people like me they should be employing to train the next generation to take over when we retire, but this friggin government just don't see it that way!

To me, age is experience 

 

swings and roundabouts Pam...lot of young ones have no chance of getting a decent job or buying a house, I really would hate to be starting out now. 

Me too, but like I say...it's peeps of my generation that should be training the next one, and so on, and so on.....

 

Not gonna happen though, is it? 

FM
Sprout posted:

Me too, but like I say...it's peeps of my generation that should be training the next one, and so on, and so on.....

 

Not gonna happen though, is it? 

 

all depends Pam....different skills and all that. I couldn't do what  half of what my daughters do...they are up to spec on stuff, some older folk would need retrained for up to date skills. 

Dame_Ann_Average

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×