Skip to main content

Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Slinkiwitch x:

Trying to figure why Oddschecker have this ?

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/...ig-brother/w-o-rylan

No  Rylan..I wishRylan /Claire  come out together tomorrow


Yeah but Gillian and Lacey are there

 I just got excited that Ryaln was missing .


Oh so was i til i noticed that Gillian and Lacey were still mentioned....they've already gone, haven't they? I haven't been watching because of you-know-who... but i've tried to keep up on here.

Bethni
Originally Posted by frodo:
Originally Posted by Slinkiwitch x:

Trying to figure why Oddschecker have this ?

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/...ig-brother/w-o-rylan

Hi Slikiwitch if you look at the top It says without Rylan,does that make sense (not to me) but pehaps some one  else may know

 

 

I know nothing about betting or odds (making me the perfect contributor to this forum ) but I assumed that Rylan was such a cert to win that the bookies aren't taking any more bets on him, so the odds are on the rest of the HMs.  The evitees don't have odds against them, just numbers, which in bookie-speak probably means you can't bet on them.... or something, don't ask me 

 

Just trying to be helpful

Bursar
Originally Posted by Bursar:
Originally Posted by frodo:
Originally Posted by Slinkiwitch x:

Trying to figure why Oddschecker have this ?

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/...ig-brother/w-o-rylan

Hi Slikiwitch if you look at the top It says without Rylan,does that make sense (not to me) but pehaps some one  else may know

 

 

I know nothing about betting or odds (making me the perfect contributor to this forum ) but I assumed that Rylan was such a cert to win that the bookies aren't taking any more bets on him, so the odds are on the rest of the HMs.  The evitees don't have odds against them, just numbers, which in bookie-speak probably means you can't bet on them.... or something, don't ask me 

 

Just trying to be helpful

If they just have a single number against them it means their odds are to 1.

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Bursar:
Originally Posted by frodo:
Originally Posted by Slinkiwitch x:

Trying to figure why Oddschecker have this ?

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/...ig-brother/w-o-rylan

Hi Slikiwitch if you look at the top It says without Rylan,does that make sense (not to me) but pehaps some one  else may know

 

 

I know nothing about betting or odds (making me the perfect contributor to this forum ) but I assumed that Rylan was such a cert to win that the bookies aren't taking any more bets on him, so the odds are on the rest of the HMs.  The evitees don't have odds against them, just numbers, which in bookie-speak probably means you can't bet on them.... or something, don't ask me 

 

Just trying to be helpful

If they just have a single number against them it means their odds are to 1.

I don't even understand that

It's all lost on me .

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:

There must be an easier way to let people know who is the fav to win and who is the fav to go,without all those numbers that mean nothing to most of us .

See the bit at the top left, it says SETTINGS FRACTIONAL DECIMAL etc. if you click on the word Decimal the odds will show as things like 1.75 or 2.25, the ones that show as a single figure just now will still show as a single figure. The favourite is the one who's number is closest to zero.

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by erinp:

There must be an easier way to let people know who is the fav to win and who is the fav to go,without all those numbers that mean nothing to most of us .

See the bit at the top left, it says SETTINGS FRACTIONAL DECIMAL etc. if you click on the word Decimal the odds will show as things like 1.75 or 2.25, the ones that show as a single figure just now will still show as a single figure. The favourite is the one who's number is closest to zero.


Cheers EFFT but still right over my head.

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Bursar:
Originally Posted by frodo:
Originally Posted by Slinkiwitch x:

Trying to figure why Oddschecker have this ?

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/...ig-brother/w-o-rylan

Hi Slikiwitch if you look at the top It says without Rylan,does that make sense (not to me) but pehaps some one  else may know

 

 

I know nothing about betting or odds (making me the perfect contributor to this forum ) but I assumed that Rylan was such a cert to win that the bookies aren't taking any more bets on him, so the odds are on the rest of the HMs.  The evitees don't have odds against them, just numbers, which in bookie-speak probably means you can't bet on them.... or something, don't ask me 

 

Just trying to be helpful

If they just have a single number against them it means their odds are to 1.

I don't even understand that

It's all lost on me .

10 would mean 10 to 1. i.e. place a bet of ÂĢ1 and if you are correct you will win ÂĢ10

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Originally Posted by erinp:

10 would mean 10 to 1. i.e. place a bet of ÂĢ1 and if you are correct you will win ÂĢ10

 

I undersatnd that part  but odds like.

7/2

15/8

11/10

I couldn/t work out who is the fav.

It simple erin - it's the lowest number, which is 11/10 above ( or 1.1 in decimal )   

 

 Because you put on eleven but they only give you ten back

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Originally Posted by erinp:

10 would mean 10 to 1. i.e. place a bet of ÂĢ1 and if you are correct you will win ÂĢ10

 

I undersatnd that part  but odds like.

7/2

15/8

11/10

I couldn/t work out who is the fav.

It simple erin - it's the lowest number, which is 11/10 above ( or 1.1 in decimal )   

 

 Because you put on eleven but they only give you ten back

You would get 11 back( 1.1 times 10 ) if you put 10 on, plus you're original stake of 10 so 21. You always get your original stake back.

 

So at 10/1 you'd get 100 back for your 10 bet, plus your stake making 110.

 

At 7/2 you'd get 35 back for your 10, plus your stake of 10 so 45. ( 7/2 equalling 3.5   

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:

10 would mean 10 to 1. i.e. place a bet of ÂĢ1 and if you are correct you will win ÂĢ10

 

I undersatnd that part  but odds like.

7/2

15/8

11/10

I couldn/t work out who is the fav.

Divide the left hand nuber by the righthand number and whoever has the LOWEST result is the favourite.

7/2 = 3.5

15/8 = 1.875

11/10 = 1.1

 

Therefor 11/10 is the favourite,

15/8 is second favourite

and 7/2 is least favourite, of those three.

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
 

And me ............this has been the worst CBB ever for me and it's because of those two .......they haven't entertained me in the slightest. Who knows what the house wold have been like without those 'miserable rain clouds of doom' in there? OK .......maybe it would have been all nicey, nicey (which a lot find boring) - personally I love it - at least there may have been a few laughs.

 

Then again I'm speaking as someone who really enjoyed BB4 so I'm probably not your average punter 

 

I simply object to people being put in to be horrible and stir things up. 

 You're not alone Soozy

FM
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
 

And me ............this has been the worst CBB ever for me and it's because of those two .......they haven't entertained me in the slightest. Who knows what the house wold have been like without those 'miserable rain clouds of doom' in there? OK .......maybe it would have been all nicey, nicey (which a lot find boring) - personally I love it - at least there may have been a few laughs.

 

Then again I'm speaking as someone who really enjoyed BB4 so I'm probably not your average punter 

 

I simply object to people being put in to be horrible and stir things up. 

 You're not alone Soozy

me too

liverbird
Originally Posted by liverbird:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
 

And me ............this has been the worst CBB ever for me and it's because of those two .......they haven't entertained me in the slightest. Who knows what the house wold have been like without those 'miserable rain clouds of doom' in there? OK .......maybe it would have been all nicey, nicey (which a lot find boring) - personally I love it - at least there may have been a few laughs.

 

Then again I'm speaking as someone who really enjoyed BB4 so I'm probably not your average punter 

 

I simply object to people being put in to be horrible and stir things up. 

 You're not alone Soozy

me too

and me I don't think people like them should be rewarded or applauded for having awful personalities like they have

Yellow Rose

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×