4 out 4 in....byebye Harriet.
Did he say FOUR HMs will be evicted?
Yep: Oathy on DS predicted this (he's in e-mail contact with the producers, and used to reading between the lines. )
It seems the producers are panicking because of the poor audience ratings. However instead of admitting the problem is their meddling (heaven forbid! ), they're convinced the problem is the HMs, so: mass clearout...
Oh really,it's all down to viewing figures etc...hmm.
New Brooms at C5......won't let the figures drop
So the housemates nominations are now meaningless and redundant...hmm not too sure if i like it.
Thanks for the company everyone ....I have to say that , despite the manipulation , the production staff are better than previous years Nite nite
Goodnight Baz
Night all
Looking forward to Friday......g'nite all.....xxxx
Mrs Shrek!
and she's doing a Jade and wittering on about 'energies'
time for bed I think
Rylan has confirmed it,four evicted..this is a good twist.
Is it vote-to-evict?
Yes.
Jade is like one of those spiders which mates then eats the boy/man spider.
Black Widow.
Harriet is brilliant. Chuck that nutcase out!
Is this audience on the payroll? I see the same faces that are always there.... even from years past.
So the housemates nominations are now meaningless and redundant...hmm not too sure if i like it.
I don't like it. I'm a BB purist about these things: don't mess with noms and who's up for eviction.
The problem is: I don't think there are many radar-dodgers in there. Certainly not four.
Danny's the only one I'd definitely consider a radar-dodger. Chloe, Sarah and especially Harriet definitely aren't.
I know many think the twins are, but they've been involved in a fair bit of bitching and arguments.
Kieran's one of the quiet ones, but also a "peace-maker". I'd be annoyed if he goes...
So the housemates nominations are now meaningless and redundant...hmm not too sure if i like it.
I don't like it. I'm a BB purist about these things: don't mess with noms and who's up for eviction.
I'm usually the same, Kimota, but this lot really do need stirring up and this is probably the best way the producers could do it. I hope it works.
Is this audience on the payroll? I see the same faces that are always there.... even from years past.
They 'rested' a few of them last year, but as they couldn't get enough regular audience- members without them, they've been allowed to return. BOTS wouldn't be BOTS without Glasses Man (Paul) imo!
Rylan would like Bianca to go in. I bet she does.
So the housemates nominations are now meaningless and redundant...hmm not too sure if i like it.
Come Friday, we will have had 6 HMs evicted, and not one of them due to a normal Diary Room nomination / viewer voting eviction...
Is this audience on the payroll? I see the same faces that are always there.... even from years past.
They 'rested' a few of them last year, but as they couldn't get enough regular audience- members without them, they've been allowed to return. BOTS wouldn't be BOTS without Glasses Man (Paul) imo!
Did he say FOUR HMs will be evicted?
Yep: Oathy on DS predicted this (he's in e-mail contact with the producers, and used to reading between the lines. )
It seems the producers are panicking because of the poor audience ratings. However instead of admitting the problem is their meddling (heaven forbid! ), they're convinced the problem is the HMs, so: mass clearout...
Oh really,it's all down to viewing figures etc...hmm.
New Brooms at C5......won't let the figures drop
The thing is, I really can't see this helping with the audience figures. I know many here don't agree, but a lot of viewers think it's a good bunch of HMs this year, and the problem is not the HMs but the constant producer meddling which isn't allowing the HMs relationships to develop organically...
four
Four what Ros - I missed that?
Four will be evicted Velvet. Whatya make of that
Magic!
But 4 are going in - so there'll be no reduction in numbers unless Jack spills the beans and gets turfed out.
Gawd they have some right fookin' eejit guests on Bots..
Does your personality change if you pluck your eyebrows?
Utter tripe!
Flippin' lame dame on stating crap about faces..
Eileens top lip is bigger than her bottom lip.
I must be sitting upside doon.
Out of those six I wouldn't mind Kieran and the twins(to mix it up) to stay,the rest meh,,
Does your personality change if you pluck your eyebrows?
The lack of a monobrow means you're not suspected of being a serial killer, so I suppose that's a good thing
Does your personality change if you pluck your eyebrows?
The lack of a monobrow means you're not suspected of being a serial killer, so I suppose that's a good thing
I`m off to pluck mine
Looks interesting!
Does your personality change if you pluck your eyebrows?
The lack of a monobrow means you're not suspected of being a serial killer, so I suppose that's a good thing
I`m off to pluck mine
Make sure you arch them well:
Goodnight all
something wrong about Jade's Ma there saying "No, not sexually anyway"
Shut up Balone(y)
She's a monster, Velvet.
And with that, I'm off; night all
Does your personality change if you pluck your eyebrows?
The lack of a monobrow means you're not suspected of being a serial killer, so I suppose that's a good thing
I`m off to pluck mine
Make sure you arch them well:
And then draw them back on with a chunky black marker pen!
Does your personality change if you pluck your eyebrows?
The lack of a monobrow means you're not suspected of being a serial killer, so I suppose that's a good thing
I`m off to pluck mine
Make sure you arch them well:
Thanks for the tip
Night all
Jade's ma sounded like she was on the voddy!