Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

Helen was put into a foster home with a vicar and his wife for fourteen weeks

she would have remained there (happily by all accounts) if she hadn't got pregnant and the authorities removed her and put her in a council house.

So she got pregnant when she was in the care of SS and not under her parent's roof, so why do you think it's all the parents fault?

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

at 16?   If she was a problem - surely it's more than likely due to her upbringing .  I don't believe anyone's born a nasty prostitute.

Seriously, without knowing all the circumstances, you think it's all her patents fault? 

I don't know.. but I don't think parents should abdicate their responsibility to a child.    They weren't young impressionable teens landed with a baby.  They were educated, intelligent, professional people.  Surely if they could't cope they could have got some help?

Kaffs
Last edited by Kaffs
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

Reading through the other links there was a lot of disharmony, parents rowing all of the time and Helen going through a v rebellious 'teenager' stage. Her parents put her into care and divorced shorty afterwards. He doesn't bother to mention any of that in that ^^^ article !

and despite saying the family had nothing to do with her since, I'm sure I read her mother was with her at the birth of her baby?  Or did I get that wrong?

She also babysat for her son while her and a friend took trips to Dublin on 'assignments' 

Bethni
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

at 16?   If she was a problem - surely it's more than likely due to her upbringing .  I don't believe anyone's born a nasty prostitute.

Seriously, without knowing all the circumstances, you think it's all her patents fault? 

I don't know.. but I don't think parents should abdicate their responsibility to a child.    They were young impressionable teens landed with a baby.  They were educated, intelligent, professional people.  Surely if they could't cope they could have got some help?

What if Helen didn't want their help? We have no idea what she put her parents through, nor how much they tried with her, so I refuse to apportion the blame for Helen's life choices on them. They don't seem to have had any problems rearing her two brothers, so perhaps the problem was with Helen, not them?

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
 

Maybe she needed straightening out....if so it didn't work

Well that's true enough!

My daughter was the teen from hell....convent boarding schools went through my mind more than once, but like all teens the time passed and she turned into a credit to us both, I would never have put her into care though, but then she didn't move in with a bf at 16 and had far too much sense than to get pregnant

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Amythist:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:

at 16?   If she was a problem - surely it's more than likely due to her upbringing .  I don't believe anyone's born a nasty prostitute.

That implies all prostitutes are nasty and I;m sure thats not so...but Helen is nasty...not because of her past career

And TBH I knew nothing about her ...or her other life ...before she came into the house ....but disliked her almost from the word go....as soon as she opened her mouth  

Baz
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

at 16?   If she was a problem - surely it's more than likely due to her upbringing .  I don't believe anyone's born a nasty prostitute.

Seriously, without knowing all the circumstances, you think it's all her patents fault? 

I don't know.. but I don't think parents should abdicate their responsibility to a child.    They were young impressionable teens landed with a baby.  They were educated, intelligent, professional people.  Surely if they could't cope they could have got some help?

What if Helen didn't want their help? We have no idea what she put her parents through, nor how much they tried with her, so I refuse to apportion the blame for Helen's life choices on them. They don't seem to have had any problems rearing her two brothers, so perhaps the problem was with Helen, not them?

^^^^ This  

Baz
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

Helen was put into a foster home with a vicar and his wife for fourteen weeks

she would have remained there (happily by all accounts) if she hadn't got pregnant and the authorities removed her and put her in a council house.

So she got pregnant when she was in the care of SS and not under her parent's roof, so why do you think it's all the parents fault?

I don't think it's all their fault.. and the pregnancy imo was a symptom of their problems, not  the cause.    Maybe she was just born evil and they were right to wash their hands of her.  I just find it difficult to accept that, that's all. 

Kaffs
Originally Posted by Baz:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

at 16?   If she was a problem - surely it's more than likely due to her upbringing .  I don't believe anyone's born a nasty prostitute.

Seriously, without knowing all the circumstances, you think it's all her patents fault? 

I don't know.. but I don't think parents should abdicate their responsibility to a child.    They were young impressionable teens landed with a baby.  They were educated, intelligent, professional people.  Surely if they could't cope they could have got some help?

What if Helen didn't want their help? We have no idea what she put her parents through, nor how much they tried with her, so I refuse to apportion the blame for Helen's life choices on them. They don't seem to have had any problems rearing her two brothers, so perhaps the problem was with Helen, not them?

^^^^ This  

Ditto

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Kaffs:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by erinp:
 
Dr Stephen Wood, said: "Helen left home when she was 16 to move in with   her boyfriend and we've not had any relationship since then. I don't know   what she does or what she gets up to."
 
Conveniently omitting that he put her into care!

 

Perhaps they had good reason to put her into care, I doubt it was a decision they took lightly.

Reading through the other links there was a lot of disharmony, parents rowing all of the time and Helen going through a v rebellious 'teenager' stage. Her parents put her into care and divorced shorty afterwards. He doesn't bother to mention any of that in that ^^^ article !

and despite saying the family had nothing to do with her since, I'm sure I read her mother was with her at the birth of her baby?  Or did I get that wrong?

Yes, I read that too

FM
Originally Posted by Amythist:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Kaffs:

at 16?   If she was a problem - surely it's more than likely due to her upbringing .  I don't believe anyone's born a nasty prostitute.

That implies all prostitutes are nasty and I;m sure thats not so...but Helen is nasty...not because of her past career

   yes,   I was just using it as an adjective for Helen, not prostitutes in general   I've already commented on prostitutes in another thread.   

Kaffs
Originally Posted by Baz:
Originally Posted by Supes:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
 

So, a friends parent contacted SS who put her into care?

SS can't and don't just 'put' kids into care, the parents must have refused to  have her back

I think you will find that they will , if they feel the child is out of control ...

 Oh yes they can and do.

Yogi19

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×