Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:

Wtf Danielle? Where did the hotdog photo come from??

It's unfair that they came out with that about her though and they didn't mention Helen's threesome with Shrek.

Helen's past is a legal nightmare i would think...

 

I was more referring to her denying doing underwear modelling

Shrek didn't get a gagging order though 

Bethni
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:

Wtf Danielle? Where did the hotdog photo come from??

It's unfair that they came out with that about her though and they didn't mention Helen's threesome with Shrek.

That is under an injunction, so they couldn't, but they should have used something else, spoiled for choice really

My memory's shakey on this, but I thought the Rooney *ahem* "business" was in the open; it's another client who has the injunction...

Eugene's Lair
Last edited by Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:

Wtf Danielle? Where did the hotdog photo come from??

It's unfair that they came out with that about her though and they didn't mention Helen's threesome with Shrek.

That is under an injunction, so they couldn't, but they should have used something else, spoiled for choice really

My memory's shakey on this, but I thought the Rooney *ahem* "business" was in the open; it's another client who has the injunction...

I thought it was both of them

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Kaytee:
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:

Wtf Danielle? Where did the hotdog photo come from??

It's unfair that they came out with that about her though and they didn't mention Helen's threesome with Shrek.

That is under an injunction, so they couldn't, but they should have used something else, spoiled for choice really

My memory's shakey on this, but I thought the Rooney *ahem* "business" was in the open; it's another client who has the injunction...

Yes Eugene, that's my belief too. Shrek didn't take out an injunction, it was the 'Actor' who did. They didn't have to mention him.

Bethni
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Originally Posted by Rosgirl:

sorry can't believe these three cretins are given this sort of decision to make

Time to take to Twitter to let Channel 5 know that they have cocked it up again, for the 96th time this series. The producers are cretins, imbeciles, plebs who need sacking immediately.

Go EC ! 

Baz

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×