Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Bethni:

I don't think it's fair that C5 changed their minds about putting Kimberly's ex and Helen's ex buddy in because they were afraid of the confrontation, yet it's ok to throw Danielle to the dogs.... and i'm not a fan of Danielle's 

TBH, I still think that stuff about "Sasha" going in was just a lot of hype.

 

Maybe a ploy to garner more viewers?

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien:
Originally Posted by Cerberus:

Feeling a bit sorry for Danielle, the knives are well and truly out.

She's a Dexter Inc. production! Throw her under the bus and save Chris I say 

Yes Roger, but i don't like the fact that Biannca can have a say in getting rid of her, it should be us. I'm annoyed that Marlon went too without out input. It's just not the BB way   

No its not  you're right Bethni 

FM
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Bethni:

I don't think it's fair that C5 changed their minds about putting Kimberly's ex and Helen's ex buddy in because they were afraid of the confrontation, yet it's ok to throw Danielle to the dogs.... and i'm not a fan of Danielle's 

TBH, I still think that stuff about "Sasha" going in was just a lot of hype.

Possibly Eugene  It's just not fair that one HM is being attcked and others are shielded

Bethni
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Bethni:

I don't think it's fair that C5 changed their minds about putting Kimberly's ex and Helen's ex buddy in because they were afraid of the confrontation, yet it's ok to throw Danielle to the dogs.... and i'm not a fan of Danielle's 

TBH, I still think that stuff about "Sasha" going in was just a lot of hype.

Possibly Eugene  It's just not fair that one HM is being attcked and others are shielded

Oh sure - I totally agree. BB are definitely setting-up certain HMs.

Eugene's Lair
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

I'm actually quite angry with this.

 

Although anything Hell-on says makes me want to kick the TV set in.

 

I'm getting more and more riled 

* Reaches for another Moscow Mule*

 

 

Throw one my way Bethni 

 

* Sticks one in a tupperware beaker and chucks EC's way*

Catch

Bethni
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

I'm actually quite angry with this.

 

Although anything Hell-on says makes me want to kick the TV set in.

 

I'm getting more and more riled 

* Reaches for another Moscow Mule*

 

 

Throw one my way Bethni 

 

* Sticks one in a tupperware beaker and chucks EC's way*

Catch

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:

Wtf Danielle? Where did the hotdog photo come from??

It's unfair that they came out with that about her though and they didn't mention Helen's threesome with Shrek.

That is under an injunction, so they couldn't, but they should have used something else, spoiled for choice really

Kaytee
Originally Posted by Bethni:
Originally Posted by Jenstar:

Wtf Danielle? Where did the hotdog photo come from??

It's unfair that they came out with that about her though and they didn't mention Helen's threesome with Shrek.

Helen's past is a legal nightmare i would think...

 

I was more referring to her denying doing underwear modelling

Jen-Star

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×