Originally Posted by Eugene's Lair:
Originally Posted by Carnelian:
I'll miss it. There's a lot of rubbish on BBC3 but there is some good and orginal stuff. The BBC are axing BBC3 because young people don't have the same political clout as the older, more affluent BBC4 viewers. Wrong demographic.
This is music to the ears of the Tories and rent seeking activities of Sky/Murdoch. A small victory in the war of attrition to carve up British media for the benefit of non-British tax paying, right wing zealot. I bet News International and Sky shares rose today.
The thing is though that if you look at the top 10 shows for BBC3 and BBC4 on a weekly basis, the viewing figures are roughly the same. If you ignore BBC4's biggest viewer draw, which is its Saturday foreign-language thriller serial (Salamander at the moment), then BBC3 does slightly better. However BBC3's weekly top 10 consists almost entirely of Family Guy and weekend movies, whereas BBC4's top 10 is largely made up of original documentaries, When you then consider that BBC3 costs almost twice as much, it's obvious that BBC4's much better value for money, so I think suggestions of age and class bias in the decision are unfair.
I agree with you that Murdoch's probably pleased at this news, though...
I'd strongly disagree there. BBC4 repeat a lot and shows a hell of a lot of archival BBC material.
BBC3 may cost twice as much but I'd bet the spin off commercial operations from BBC3 shows dwarf those of BBC4.
I'd bet Being Human and Little Britain alone dwarf BBC4's commerical returns.
The BBC is awash with stuff that the commerical stations saturate the airwaves with. Property, cooking, reality and celebrity rubbish. BBC3 is far better than its commercial equivalent, E4, which mostly sources from the US.
I wouldn't like to see either go, but the BBC is being leant on by expansionist right wing interests, totally supported by the government. For those interests, the only concern is whittling down the BBC so the TV industry is in private hands.