Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Yellow Rose:
Originally Posted by Videostar:

Sam,  none of the others stand a chance, and it doesn't matter if an angel from heaven goes in tomorrow, Sam has it in the bag.

Is that because he has a hearing impairment, or because of his personality, just curious

He seems nice enough, but even if he sat in the middle of the garden for 9 weeks not saying a word and not taking part in the show he'd still win, and you know why...his "overcoming difficulties", the life story.

 

He wont be judged the same as all the other HM's now, just like Luke A wasn't, just like Pete wasn't and just like Nadia wasn't...it's a total unfair joke to this show.

Videostar
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by Yellow Rose:
Originally Posted by Videostar:

Sam,  none of the others stand a chance, and it doesn't matter if an angel from heaven goes in tomorrow, Sam has it in the bag.

Is that because he has a hearing impairment, or because of his personality, just curious

He seems nice enough, but even if he sat in the middle of the garden for 9 weeks not saying a word and not taking part in the show he'd still win, and you know why...his "overcoming difficulties", the life story.

 

He wont be judged the same as all the other HM's now, just like Luke A wasn't, just like Pete wasn't and just like Nadia wasn't...it's a total unfair joke to this show.

I understand what you're saying but I think if voters want someone to win because they're "different" for whatever reason I think it's an insult to the person concerned, I don't think they'd want a sympathy vote as it's a bit patronising. Personally I wouldn't vote for that reason alone - having watched since series 1it's a lot of years since I've voted - but if I was to vote I'd choose someone because I like them and their personality, which might include a life story but likeability factor is still more important personally.

Yellow Rose

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×