2 strong HMs up against each other so they put the two penneth in, why can't they just leave it be.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
well all it takes is for people not to discuss noms...simple really.
They could (and should have) discounted the noms from the 3 punished for talking about them...
They could (and should have) discounted the noms from the 3 punished for talking about them...
quote:Originally posted by FGG Aka Crocodile Rock:
well all it takes is for people not to discuss noms...simple really.
They could (and should have) discounted the noms from the 3 punished for talking about them...
Thats exactly what I said to the OH Croc (or any one that will listen)
In the past they have not been able to vote as well as being up for eviction.
Kris had the chance not to be up, but couldn't keep quiet, I knew they would start messing soon to break the group up, None group members were being picked off one at a time.
They also have to present a television show every night and they have heard the grumbling about Lisa taking over the show and nursing he gang through to the final. They know this would cause a mass switch off and have acted in the interests of the programme.
They've done it before and they'll probably do it again.
They've done it before and they'll probably do it again.
quote:They've done it before and they'll probably do it again.
I'm amazed they left it this long act.
I'm glad they did it, l don't like Kris and co and the hold they have on the nominations. Clearly there have been discussions over who they would nominate, they should have done this sooner.
I agree with that, but have to say I do like it when there are more than 2 up and the fact it may break the group up, but I do not like it when they interfere as it can be seen as favourtism to certain HMs.quote:Originally posted by FGG Aka Crocodile Rock:
well all it takes is for people not to discuss noms...simple really.
They could (and should have) discounted the noms from the 3 punished for talking about them...
quote:I'm glad they did it,
As much as I don't like the mob,
I'd rather H/M were up through nominations.
If they hadn't of discussed nominations, then they would not have been up.
So, it is their fault.
So, it is their fault.
I know that LL, but it seems BB choose there moments and whom to punish that is my point, Lisa hasn't been punished has she?quote:Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
If they hadn't of discussed nominations, then they would not have been up.
So, it is their fault.
me too RZBquote:Originally posted by RZB:quote:I'm glad they did it,
As much as I don't like the mob,
I'd rather H/M were up through nominations.
True enough, but they did it in BB6 to break up Saskia's gang and in BB7 to break up the Sezar/Grace team. They might have done it in BB8 but I try not to think about BB8.quote:Originally posted by RZB:quote:I'm glad they did it,
As much as I don't like the mob,
I'd rather H/M were up through nominations.
All housemates discuss nominations, and make their own predictions. BB are selective about how they punish nomination discussions, and often don't punish them at all.
quote:True enough, but they did it in BB6 to break up Saskia's gang and in BB7 to break up the Sezar/Grace team. They might have done it in BB8 but I try not to think about BB8.
didn't they do it to keep Charley in a few weeks longer.
quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:I know that LL, but it seems BB choose there moments and whom to punish that is my point, Lisa hasn't been punished has she?quote:Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
If they hadn't of discussed nominations, then they would not have been up.
So, it is their fault.
Oh I agree with you there. Yes, those up should be up as punishment, but so should Karly and Lisa be up
True. That's one of the reasons I try not to think about BB8.quote:Originally posted by RZB:quote:True enough, but they did it in BB6 to break up Saskia's gang and in BB7 to break up the Sezar/Grace team. They might have done it in BB8 but I try not to think about BB8.
didn't they do it to keep Charley in a few weeks longer.
that is the most blatant BB has been with noms guiding shall we sayquote:Originally posted by RZB:quote:True enough, but they did it in BB6 to break up Saskia's gang and in BB7 to break up the Sezar/Grace team. They might have done it in BB8 but I try not to think about BB8.
didn't they do it to keep Charley in a few weeks longer.
quote:Originally posted by RZB:quote:True enough, but they did it in BB6 to break up Saskia's gang and in BB7 to break up the Sezar/Grace team. They might have done it in BB8 but I try not to think about BB8.
didn't they do it to keep Charley in a few weeks longer.
The Charley thing was a real low point for me. the one time I boycotted the programme. It was just so blatant. She was'nt even a popular hm with the voters but they let the other hms believe she was. BB have always been inconsistant with punishments, but at least with this twist we have a choice to evict Kris, Charlie or Sophie or to evict the other two!
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
101 online (3 members
/
98 guests),
0 chatting