Disgraceful IMO. Should have been longer.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Boyfriend received 12 years plus life for another case and the lodger received 3 years!!
Sickening. HE only got 12 years. Just sickening
Must have been the oh-so-sincere letter of apology she wrote to the judge. Come on guys.....she was sorry
Oh it just makes me SO MAD!!!!!!!
Oh it just makes me SO MAD!!!!!!!
*Pesky-Pixie* (Guest)
quote:Originally posted by HyacinthB:
Disgraceful IMO. Should have been longer.
Much, much longer...for all of them.
noway long enough.....
Funny. Because the Beeb are reporting she has been jailed 'indefinitely'.
She has been jailed indefinitely but why let the facts get in the way, eh?
isnt that about 3.5 yrs shell serve then?.....take of time already served on remand.....2.5 yrs?...remaining
then the help sh will get to rebrand herself when she comes out!...new id police protetion could even go as far as maxine carr plastic surgery!......
then the help sh will get to rebrand herself when she comes out!...new id police protetion could even go as far as maxine carr plastic surgery!......
indefinatley?.......oh ok scrtch above lets hope she serves 30 yrs plus but i doubt it
quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Funny. Because the Beeb are reporting she has been jailed 'indefinitely'.
Eamonn Holmes just reported the news on This Morning as it was breaking from the Old Bailey.
Maybe he was misinformed via his earpiece.
He did go on to say that the mother had already spent 2 years in jail so I guess, if Eamonn Holmes is correct, she only has another 8 years!!
Where's the justice in that for that little boy?
*Pesky-Pixie* (Guest)
quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Funny. Because the Beeb are reporting she has been jailed 'indefinitely'.
Just put Sky news on...jailed indefinitely - minimum 5 years to serve...for Baby Peters Mum. Boyfriend indef' minimum 10 years (for the rape).
Oh well, think I'll wait for the news report on ITV at 11.25am.
omg who did he rape?
well the minimum term is 10 years, still thats less than little peters childhood should have lasted.
i think at least a 20 year minimum would have been a start.
i think at least a 20 year minimum would have been a start.
quote:Originally posted by j0anne:
omg who did he rape?
a little girl
*Pesky-Pixie* (Guest)
quote:Originally posted by j0anne:
omg who did he rape?
A two year old girl.
Don't you just love it when you get conflicting news reports. I mean how hard is it to relay the bliddy sentence.
I'm going to roll my eyes now
I'm going to roll my eyes now
I cant say how i feel about this,its upset me so much but i hope to God they get hell in prison
dear god....ut his willy of his tounge out and his hands of ....then he wont be able to harm another....infact he is a good reason for the death penalty
*Pesky-Pixie* (Guest)
quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Don't you just love it when you get conflicting news reports. I mean how hard is it to relay the bliddy sentence.
I'm going to roll my eyes now
Yup...Sky are changing the ticker verses their breaking news title like nobodies business. Surely the facts are the facts....maybe not though!
So if if I have got this right the boyfriend has been given 12 years for assisting in killing a little boy but is expected to get life for raping a little girl.
Surely it should be the other way around, although hanging would be to good for either crime in my book.
Surely it should be the other way around, although hanging would be to good for either crime in my book.
if they'd have robbed a bank they woulda been in for life 25+
kill a kid and you get 10years
mind you-all three of the bastards will suffer in the nick
kill a kid and you get 10years
mind you-all three of the bastards will suffer in the nick
*Pesky-Pixie* (Guest)
quote:Originally posted by luxor:
So if if I have got this right the boyfriend has been given 12 years for assisting in killing a little boy but is expected to get life for raping a little girl.
Surely it should be the other way around, although hanging would be to good for either crime in my book.
Not sure....I'd give the news channels a couple of hours to sort out the agreed facts - then we might know what is actually happening.
...and I agree imo no sentence would be long enough...other than life meaning life for them all.
itv news have just said the mother will serve at least 5 years
quote:Originally posted by Aimee:
itv news have just said the mother will serve at least 5 years
5years of hell i hope-evil bitch
and
good morning aimee
I'm googling and every news outlet.. different reports. The grauniad, however, is hedgeing its bets by only reporting the fella's sentence..
quote:Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
well the minimum term is 10 years, still thats less than little peters childhood should have lasted.
i think at least a 20 year minimum would have been a start.
That would work for me. Horrendous excuses for human beings.
quote:mind you-all three of the bastards will suffer in the nick
god i hope so,hope they r locked in there cells 24/7 with nothing but a bed sink n loo then when they think its save to come out the cell in a few yrs time beated to death very slowly
quote:Originally posted by china:quote:Originally posted by Aimee:
itv news have just said the mother will serve at least 5 years
5years of hell i hope-evil bitch
and
good morning aimee
only 5 years disgraceful makes my blood boil!!
quote:Originally posted by china:quote:Originally posted by Aimee:
itv news have just said the mother will serve at least 5 years
5years of hell i hope-evil bitch
and
good morning aimee
hello china
quote:Originally posted by china:
if they'd have robbed a bank they woulda been in for life 25+
kill a kid and you get 10years
mind you-all three of the bastards will suffer in the nick
This is what makes me maddest of all - rob a bank 25 = years, money launder 25+ years, tax evasion 25+ years. Kill or sexually abuse a kid....anything from about 18 months. So wrong.
*Pesky-Pixie* (Guest)
Times online has just changed theirs from 10 years to indefinitely.
quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Don't you just love it when you get conflicting news reports. I mean how hard is it to relay the bliddy sentence.
I'm going to roll my eyes now
Sorry tupps. I was only relaying the news as reported by Eamonn Holmes.
I don't normally make threads and wish I hadn't bothered now as he appears to have been misinformed via his earpiece!
My apologies again.
quote:Originally posted by HyacinthB:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Don't you just love it when you get conflicting news reports. I mean how hard is it to relay the bliddy sentence.
I'm going to roll my eyes now
Sorry tupps. I was only relaying the news as reported by Eamonn Holmes.
I don't normally make threads and wish I hadn't bothered now as he appears to have been misinformed via his earpiece!
My apologies again.
Wasn't talking about you love.. I was referring to our news outlets.
Bloody shambolic innit.
quote:Originally posted by HyacinthB:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
Don't you just love it when you get conflicting news reports. I mean how hard is it to relay the bliddy sentence.
I'm going to roll my eyes now
Sorry tupps. I was only relaying the news as reported by Eamonn Holmes.
I don't normally make threads and wish I hadn't bothered now as he appears to have been misinformed via his earpiece!
My apologies again.
Dont apologise - you informed us as you had been informed - tupps is right - wish they'd get the facts right before informing the nation
Thanks tupps and, yes, I agree, there does appear to be several conflicting reports going on at the moment.
Beeb, Times, Grauniad all saying indefinitely. Sky has just changed theirs too.
She must serve at least 5 years, which is an absolute disgrace. She should serve at least 15 - preferably never to come out and have children again.
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
615 online (0 members
/
615 guests),
0 chatting