Love him or hate him - Gadaffi has governed a stable country (not one we approve of but stable all the same) for the last forty years. I really don't see how working in Lybia has been risking your life. PP ...........you do say some very silly things to back up your points.
But his life wasn't at immediate risk 'for money' before. He stays out there as has been pointed out several times to provide an income for his family. His life is at risk now because of recent events, so home he comes. To be honest whether his company bring him home or the government does who really cares? *I'm glad he's safe Soops*. It's not a waste of taxpayers money to rescue British people from a war zone.
Paying two halfwit milliionaires to drive the country into ruin is a waste of taxpayers money.
What I said pages ago....get them out! Work out costs etc when home...Much less than "Call me Dave's" jaunt round Egypt!.,
The British government has come under fire for not reacting swiftly or responsible enough, as it did in the case of the uprising in Egypt, and yesterday British PM David Cameron offered a public apology for the governmentâs slow reaction. Saying that, there was a problem with the fact that the airspace was closed down for almost a day and then insurer Lloyds of London slowed things down as it wanted to agree with the government on partial cover of indemnity.
After a few days and nights of constant communication with British officials, Managing Director of Epic-Air, Alan Henderson, informed The Daily today that a plane had successfully landed in Tripoli to collect stranded British citizens and possibly others. For security reasons, we cannot disclose any of the details of the flight yet, but The Daily will be providing updated reports on this rescue effort, led by Slovak-based company Epic-Air.
Read more: EXCLUSIVE: Slovak company gets Brits out of Libya | The Daily News â Slovakia http://www.thedaily.sk/2011/02...libya/#ixzz1F13d3lUR
^^^ Agree with this
A logical extension of your argument there would mean the UK, with its track record of involvement in conflict, would be deemed a high risk place to work.. should we all be be making plans to relocate?
I am having a little Deja Vu on this thread,same eejits ,same sh*t.
A logical extension of your argument there would mean the UK, with its track record of involvement in conflict, would be deemed a high risk place to work.. should we all be be making plans to relocate?
Was just about to say something similar - with the terrorism threat to the major cities, should foreigners or even Britons who reside outside the cities refrain from taking higher paid employment (or even, possibly the only chance of employment) because of the potential risk?
It's mad isn't it! *shakes head*
cos you have a go on people..?
no
i wont
i will not
i shan't
so there
that told you..
cos you have a go on people..?
no
i wont
i will not
i shan't
so there
that told you..
*titters*
Silly bugger!