There has been a lot of talk this week about the Government "rescue" mission being "not good enough" however should they really be held responsible for rescuing people who have gone to that country of their own free will? Should they not have shown greater responsibility when making the decision to go there in the first place?
There has been a lot of talk this week about the Government "rescue" mission being "not good enough" however should they really be held responsible for rescuing people who have gone to that country of their own free will? Should they not have shown greater responsibility when making the decision to go there in the first place?
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Unfortunately the current government set the agenda when in opposition. Anything that went wrong, even more surreally the economic collapse, were blamed on Labour and Gordon Brown. Obviously everything that happens now, and that includes Middlesbrough losing to QPR, will be blamed on Cameron.
Not that he will be bothered. Him and his mates have all your money.
I think they should be rescued.
Obviously everything that happens now, and that includes Middlesbrough losing to QPR, will be blamed on Cameron.
Not that he will be bothered. Him and his mates have all your money.He's a Chelsea supporter!
No need to send any, they can just visit their warehouse in downtown Tripoli
So yes they made their bed, and they CAN lie in it. But I do agree that volunteers and humanitarian workers should be helped, but people who chose a life out there and have been paid bucketloads of money for X amount of years paying no tax over here??? No way. Personally, I would rather shoot myself than live in the middle east, even before all this stuff going on.... I can't imagine a worse place to live, for many different reasons.
It is annoying if its filthy rich oil executives though
It is annoying if its filthy rich oil executives though
The company people work for are responsible in the first instant, but the moral high ground can be taken by the Foreign Office, which this country failed for 3 whole days. Quite unbelievable.
Of course I hope those in Libya get home safety, but I think those complaining about the rescue mission should be grateful we help them out at all. I suppose not everyone is in the same boat as the guy I know.... some may be out there for other reasons.
It is annoying if its filthy rich oil executives though
The company people work for are responsible in the first instant, but the moral high ground can be taken by the Foreign Office, which this country failed for 3 whole days. Quite unbelievable.
Mincepie, The money issue really does not make up for the safety. My ex husband had to pay taxes on his income, it wasn't quite as much as he would have working back here, but he had done that for 30 years, why on earth would somebody who is qualified not take up a position that would pay them a decent wage and give them a chance to explore an extremly foreign country? When we both passed the medical we had to go through, we sat in a London cab and whooped all the way back to the hotel. We were healthy and we got to go to Africa. What more can a person want?
It is annoying if its filthy rich oil executives though
The company people work for are responsible in the first instant, but the moral high ground can be taken by the Foreign Office, which this country failed for 3 whole days. Quite unbelievable.
When the Twin towers were first hit in the 80's I think..the people in it ran onto the roof, helicopters from everywhere tried to save them, there followed an arguement between the fire department and the Police that was'nt resumed who was in charge of rooftop rescue..so they locked the roof doors on the Twin towers....
So rather than have an arguement who should do what, just let one department sort it and bill the rest....
When the Twin towers were first hit in the 80's I think..the people in it ran onto the roof, helicopters from everywhere tried to save them, there followed an arguement between the fire department and the Police that was'nt resumed who was in charge of rooftop rescue..so they locked the roof doors on the Twin towers....
So rather than have an arguement who should do what, just let one department sort it and bill the rest....
Edit: That's not the British Embassy.
supercalafragilistic quote:
My bil has worked in Libya for about 30 years, he, and many like him, didn't go out there to earn 'big bucks,' they went when all of the industry was closing in the NE, courtesy of Mrs.Thatcher and the choice for so many was to try and get work abroad or to not work at all. So, it could be argued that they were showing great responsibility when they made the decision to go out there, by earning a living to support their family. Make no mistake about it, neither he nor any of his work mates I know would be out there if there was alternative employment available for them at home
I don't really buy this... Yes in the 80s, it was a tough time (as it is now,) and some folk went abroad to work, but I find it hard to believe that your BIL couldn't get any work in any other country outside of the middle east for 30 years. I mean, there was a rough time for a while, but why did he not return when things got better over here? (and they did get better...) So why stay 30 years? He must have wanted to stay out there.
quote:
Of course I hope those in Libya get home safety, but I think those complaining about the rescue mission should be grateful we help them out at all.
It is annoying if its filthy rich oil executives though
The company people work for are responsible in the first instant, but the moral high ground can be taken by the Foreign Office, which this country failed for 3 whole days. Quite unbelievable.
No I'm not wrong... yeah your employer is first port of call - but only if its possible for them to assist you. Its the law that governs this Cologne! As a British national, you have rights you are entitled to from your Government, when living abroad. Your British passport is more valuable than you know... I studied International Law once upon a time. Thats the case, they are responsible for your safety when you're abroad.
So yes they made their bed, and they CAN lie in it. But I do agree that volunteers and humanitarian workers should be helped, but people who chose a life out there and have been paid bucketloads of money for X amount of years paying no tax over here??? No way. Personally, I would rather shoot myself than live in the middle east, even before all this stuff going on.... I can't imagine a worse place to live, for many different reasons.
If they are tax dodgers then deal with that when they get back here. We're talking about people, business people and maybe dodgy ones but still people. Probably with family here who care about them. NOT murderers, NOT paedophiles.....tax dodgers who thought they were better off elsewhere and are learning the hard way now that that's not always the case.
So yes they made their bed, and they CAN lie in it.
TBH, I don't personally know anyone who works here or abroad who fits the description above, but then again, nor do I know anyone in rl who lacks the basic sense of humanity and empathy that is displayed by some of the fms on here. Maybe I'm just lucky?
Unfortunately the current government set the agenda when in opposition. Anything that went wrong, even more surreally the economic collapse, were blamed on Labour and Gordon Brown. Obviously everything that happens now, and that includes Middlesbrough losing to QPR, will be blamed on Cameron.
Not that he will be bothered. Him and his mates have all your money.
I don't really buy this... Yes in the 80s, it was a tough time (as it is now,) and some folk went abroad to work, but I find it hard to believe that your BIL couldn't get any work in any other country outside of the middle east for 30 years. I mean, there was a rough time for a while, but why did he not return when things got better over here? (and they did get better...) So why stay 30 years? He must have wanted to stay out there.
but why did he not return when things got better over here?
I bet any person on here would do things to make their family life better.
Nah I take that back. There are some on here who are so bitter and narrow minded that the feelings of another person (never mind many people) is something way beyond their comprehension.
why did he not return when things got better over here? (and they did get better...) So why stay 30 years? He must have wanted to stay out there.
Why should he come back if the quality of life is better for him elsewhere? What's your problem exactly? And contrary to your earlier post those people are our responsibility. If they have British passports and they're caught in a war zone it's our responsibility to get them out. That's not an opinion, it's a fact.
Edit: That's not the British Embassy.