Skip to main content

Celebrity Big Brother 2014 bosses have warned Evander Holyfield after the boxer told Luisa Zissman he suggested homosexuality can be cured, and compared it to being ‘handicapped’.

The pair had spent almost all their time in the house together thanks to the series launch twist, which saw the housemates being paired off and handcuffed together until further notice.

However, former Apprentice contestant Luisa became uncomfortable with Evander last night when she asked him whether there are any gay people in boxing, leading the heavyweight champion to reveal his opinions on same-sex relationships.

After Evander said he thinks they “ain’t normal”, Luisa attempted to end the conversation – which had not come to light until it was aired on Channel 5 this evening – but he proceeded to imply that homosexuality could be ‘fixed’.

The transcript of their chat, as aired in the latest highlights show, is as follows:

Luisa: Is there any gay boxers?

Evander: Yeah, I’m sure there is.

Luisa: Is it public knowledge?

Evander: Ain’t no-one came out and said they were.

Luisa: I think it’s really bad that no-one stands up and says it in the sporting industries. I think it’s good to be open about that because it’s normal.

Evander: What would be good about it? That ain’t normal.

Luisa: We shouldn’t have this conversation. No, let’s not have this conversation, it won’t be good.

Evander: The bible let’s you know, that’s wrong, that’s right.

Luisa: That’s just the way some people are.

Evander: No, it don’t make no difference. If you were born and your leg were turned this way, what do you do, you go to the doctor and get it fixed back right.

Luisa: It’s not about being fixed, it’s aboutâ€Ķ that’s just the way that you are.

Evander: No no no no no, you mean to tell meâ€Ķ

Luisa: I really don’t want to have this conversation.

Evander: I’m not mad, I’m just sayingâ€Ķ

Luisa: You don’t understand, I don’t think it’s an appropriate conversation to have in this house, honestly.

Evander: All I’m trying to tell you, you know how handicapped people are born, you can’t say because they were born that wayâ€Ķ

Luisa: You can’t compare, of course you can’t compare someone that’s gay to someone that’s handicapped, it’s not a choice.

Evander: Yes it is a choice, come on, that ain’t the way nobody is made.

Luisa: I’m tired. I don’t think people have a choice in their sexuality, or they would be unhappy.

Today, Big Brother called Evander to the Diary Room to caution him about offensive language, but stopped short of giving him an formal reprimand.

“Before you entered the Big Brother house, the rules regarding unacceptable language and behaviour were explained to you. Last night, in a conversation with Luisa, you expressed the view that being gay was not normal and that it could be fixed,” explained Big Brother.

“While Big Brother understands these are the views you hold, they aren’t the views that are held by a large section of society and expressing these views will be extremely offensive to many people. Do you understand why?”

“Yeah I understand why, I forgot about the thing,” Evander answered. “I was just telling her my opinion, but it’s not like I was gonna mention it to anybody else, that was just our conversation.”

“Big Brother does not tolerate the use of offensive language and must therefore warn you to consider very carefully the effect expressing such views may have and the harm and offence you may cause by repeating these views inside the house,” the all-seeing eye continued. “Do you understand, Evander?”

“Okay then,” said Evander. “Yes I do.”


Read more: http://www.bbspy.co.uk/cbb13/n...r-2014#ixzz2pZPB4icY

FM
Originally Posted by kimota (Corin's Crib #1) FAKER # 1:
Originally Posted by suzybean:
I can't wait to see what's being said about this on DS. They're probably going feral over it. I'll save it for my post school run coffee.

They are indeed! I have spent an hour reading the threads and posting !

I couldn't resist, I powered up the lappy and went in. Typical DS 

suzybean
 
It would appear the Presenters get no advance warning of what is going to be aired 
 
these tweets as Rylan has his twitter and facebook linked were on my facebook wall - most of them have now been deleted from his twitter feed 
 
 
 
Everyone is entitled to their opinion... And as a presenter I legally remain unbiased. HOWEVER what evander just said, was disgusting.
 
The thing is , I genuinely don't think evander thinks what he's saying is offensive. Which comes down to his upbringing and religion....
 
And as I've said, religion , upbringing etc shapes us all for life. Just so sad to think the fact I'm in love with a man means I'm 'broken'
 
Everyone's entitled to their opinion,as much as fantastic charities like @stonewalluk campaign, some people think us 'gays' need to be fixed

 

And now I've said my piece, on with the rest of the series. Each to their own x
 
But as I say each to their own, we all have our opinions. And are all entitled to them. Off to bed now with my BOYfriend. Night night x
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MrsH
Originally Posted by suzybean:
I might need to be reminded Vids. That's if you're alright about repeating the just of what Sam said. I don't want to offend your delicate and sensitive nature.

He said to the woman assistant to the knife thrower "show us your gash for bangers and mash"  not even I am that crude, and would never say that to a total stranger...or even the woman in my life for that matter.

Videostar
Last edited by Videostar
Originally Posted by Cossius Clay (Cosi):
Originally Posted by Videostar:

As much as I disagree with Van on this his comments weren't half as bad as Sam's disgusting remarks in the BB house last year, never a warning from BB.

Surely that would depend on how strongly your religious beliefs are versus how strongly you feel about Sam's opinions on women..?

 

Or, you could be offended by both of course.

Hmmm, im not a big fan of those who spout out crazy beliefs and hide behind their religion as an excuse as to why they have those opinions.

 

He is of course entitled to his opinions, but he should be man enough to step up and say that those are HIS VIEWS and not that "it's my religion" , it's a cop out to say it's what the bible teaches him.

Videostar
Originally Posted by Cossius Clay (Cosi):
Originally Posted by suzybean:
I'm on my phone so can't quote but I agree with Cosi. His religion/faith whatever informs his opinions. But that mental monk from a few years ago had similar views and he came second (if I recall correctly).

 

Are there any religious works that do accept homosexuality or are they all in agreement that it's a no-no?

 

If you believe in a religion then you must believe in its teachings 100%.  You can't pick and choose - or can you?    It's all far too complicated, contrived and bizarre for me to grasp fully!

 

I think most religious followers of whatever book they read do mix and match, without exception, they, like the rest of us, choose to believe the teaching that closely supports their own opinion and ignore the conflict of texts that do not support that view.

i.e. homosexuality is a sin an aberration and can be fixed  -    god has made man in his own image, we are all god's children.

So which one is it? you accept everyone as a child of god warts and all, or you decide that in some cases god got it wrong?

Makes no sense, he has a right to his view , it's a very simplistic view,can't say I find it offensive, , but maybe I would if I were gay.

 

jacksonb

I think I am going to be against the grain here.. [gets ready to duck]

 

I think BB were completely out of order with the way they dealt with the whole thing in public. Evander holds some very warped beliefs, a lot out there hold similar, they all need to be educated about how ridiculous their beliefs are and in order to educate them we actually do need to hear what those views are so we can point them in a different direction however, he was not evangelising about his beliefs to the whole house, he was having a quiet private convo with a fellow Housemate. .

 

it didn't need to be broadcast, he could have been pulled aside and told if he had that convo in a wider group within the house and tried to convert people to his way of thinking or used it as an intended insult against the gay community then that would be against the rules.. .He could also be told that his beliefs are likely to cause offence to the majority and to be aware that expressing them widely would cause offence.. to me I just looked at the TV and felt sad at his, and all those that think the same way, ignorance.. 

 

My point is none of what went on needed to be shown as it was a private convo which developed because of questions Luisa asked about were there any gay boxers.. having said that I hate boxers [legalised beating up] so bye bye Evander and take Dippy with you

 

 

Mount Olympus *Olly*
Last edited by Mount Olympus *Olly*

I sort of agree with this Olly. I don't think it was necessary for us to see it ......he could have been taken into the DR and told that it was unwise/unacceptable to make those remarks in case they may have been broadcast and could causev offence. It wasn't part of any larger conversation and it didn't link into a 'story line'. Not really necessary to agitate and fan flames IMO.

 

 

Whops - I said I was gonna stay out of BB discussions

Soozy Woo

I don't think you're going against the grain Olly (not from my point of view anyway - that's what I was trying to say last night)    He's wrong, obviously, but it was his opinion and, yes, it didn't have to be shown

 

From Kimota's post

 

There are laws against inciting hatred based upon sexuality in this country and BB has to be careful not to fall foul of those. 

 

I think that's the crux of it.. he wasn't trying to incite anything or insult anyone directly (although I accept the sentiment is insulting to the gay community)  He was discussing his belief, based on his religion, in much the same way that Jim was disagreeing with Liz earlier about animals being 'beasts of burden' and hence he sees no wrong in eating them. 

Kaffs

Soozy that was what I was trying to say. .it wasn't part of any storyline or mass discussion so had no part in the edit other than to show him for the idiot he is with such beliefs.. they could have pointed that out to him in private so he didn't raise those issues in something that may make an edit as they are offensive views.. but sadly many people think the same way. .

 

If BB want to be seen as forward thinking I think a discussion on the topic to educate people would do more good but, that would be too grown up and serious for BB wouldn't it 

 

kaffy glad I wasn't going agaisnt the grain..

 

Aimee I understand why Rylan went mad but if hadn't been shown and wasn't on LF he'd have been none the wiser.. he's not daft enough to not know it is a common belief amongst a lot of ignorant people.. and lots like Evander aren't too bright in the brain department to even express why they believe what they believe properly either, thus making it sound even more offensive as they try to explain something they appear to just have been brainwashed about and haven't really thought about properly.. sadly

Mount Olympus *Olly*
Originally Posted by suzybean:
I'm no theologian but I don't think there's any reason to have faith and not accept people's sexuality and accept them in to the fold. I'll  ask my former parish Vicar. He's gay.

Exactly Suzy. Our current Pope when asked about his stance on homosexuality said "Who am I to judge anyone" despite the Catholic Churches teachings, i.e. he took a more gentle Christ-like approach, rather than hellfire and brimstone.

 

Its almost like New Testament vs Old Testament.

FM
Originally Posted by suzybean:
The point is that it is offensive. If something had been said about race along the same lines then it would be a total cut and dried case.....and there are people who sincerely believe that some races are more loved and favoured by the Almighty than others.

Ditto. I think he should have been thrown out... its a derogatory, offensive remark [ private conversation, private beliefs or not]. Surely discrimination is discrimination? If one of the lesser celebs made those remarks... they'd have been turfed out that night like that BB Emily who said the "N" word.

 

Mind you on second thoughts, this is Ch 5, and they have Jim Davidson in there.

FM
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien (fka noseyrosie):
Originally Posted by suzybean:
The point is that it is offensive. If something had been said about race along the same lines then it would be a total cut and dried case.....and there are people who sincerely believe that some races are more loved and favoured by the Almighty than others.

Ditto. I think he should have been thrown out... its a derogatory, offensive remark [ private conversation, private beliefs or not]. Surely discrimination is discrimination? If one of the lesser celebs made those remarks... they'd have been turfed out that night like that BB Emily who said the "N" word.

 

Mind you on second thoughts, this is Ch 5, and they have Jim Davidson in there.

Yeah Rosie C5 don't care. I still haven't got over the tyranny of Conor and how he was allowed to stay after coming out with all that graphic violent language.

 

Evander needs to revisit his Bible (Old and New) and see what it also says about marriage and divorce. I think he mentioned he had 3 ex-wives (or 3 marriages). The Bible says more about that than homosexuality, but then again he's probably glossed over those passages.

 

suzybean
Originally Posted by suzybean:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien (fka noseyrosie):
 

Yeah Rosie C5 don't care. I still haven't got over the tyranny of Conor and how he was allowed to stay after coming out with all that graphic violent language.

 

Evander needs to revisit his Bible (Old and New) and see what it also says about marriage and divorce. I think he mentioned he had 3 ex-wives (or 3 marriages). The Bible says more about that than homosexuality, but then again he's probably glossed over those passages.

 

 Oh you're so right! I forgot about that.. AND they allowed him to go home with a fortune.

Yes... three wives - wouldn't that be adultery? Thou shalt not commit adultery. Evander must only know 9 commandments 

FM
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien (fka noseyrosie):
Originally Posted by suzybean:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien (fka noseyrosie):
 

Yeah Rosie C5 don't care. I still haven't got over the tyranny of Conor and how he was allowed to stay after coming out with all that graphic violent language.

 

Evander needs to revisit his Bible (Old and New) and see what it also says about marriage and divorce. I think he mentioned he had 3 ex-wives (or 3 marriages). The Bible says more about that than homosexuality, but then again he's probably glossed over those passages.

 

 Oh you're so right! I forgot about that.. AND they allowed him to go home with a fortune.

Yes... three wives - wouldn't that be adultery? Thou shalt not commit adultery. Evander must only know 9 commandments 

Homosexuality isn't even mentioned in the 10 Commandments. Maybe Moses dropped that one 

 

I do understand why it is mentioned in the Bible though. It was written (or divinely inspired) in a time when there was little or no civilisation so it was included in a roundabout way to stop people rogering everything and everyone around them senseless.

 

edited to add...and the context of Biblical times was all about multiplying so obviously there was more emphasis on creating children. That ruled all forms of sodomy (men and women) and even spilling of seed. Look what happened to poor Onan! If that was still the case most men today would be wiped out in an instant  

suzybean
Last edited by suzybean
Originally Posted by suzybean:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien (fka noseyrosie):
Originally Posted by suzybean:
The point is that it is offensive. If something had been said about race along the same lines then it would be a total cut and dried case.....and there are people who sincerely believe that some races are more loved and favoured by the Almighty than others.

Ditto. I think he should have been thrown out... its a derogatory, offensive remark [ private conversation, private beliefs or not]. Surely discrimination is discrimination? If one of the lesser celebs made those remarks... they'd have been turfed out that night like that BB Emily who said the "N" word.

 

Mind you on second thoughts, this is Ch 5, and they have Jim Davidson in there.

Yeah Rosie C5 don't care. I still haven't got over the tyranny of Conor and how he was allowed to stay after coming out with all that graphic violent language.

 

Evander needs to revisit his Bible (Old and New) and see what it also says about marriage and divorce. I think he mentioned he had 3 ex-wives (or 3 marriages). The Bible says more about that than homosexuality, but then again he's probably glossed over those passages.

 

Well he certainly ploughs the fields and scatters his good seed on the land. He has eleven children by five different women. I do rather object to bible bashers who pick and choose what they want to follow. If he's that devout and sticks rigidly to the bibles teachings at least he should have some consistency.

Soozy Woo
Olly is right. It is his opinion and as long as he's not directly abusing someone then he's entitled to them. Most of us disagree with his opinion but why should expressing one opinion warrant a punishment from BB but another opinion doesn't?

Had he started aggressively abusing someone with his opinions, that would be a different matter.

No chance of winning though now.
Crunchy Nuts
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

I sort of agree with this Olly. I don't think it was necessary for us to see it ......he could have been taken into the DR and told that it was unwise/unacceptable to make those remarks in case they may have been broadcast and could causev offence. It wasn't part of any larger conversation and it didn't link into a 'story line'. Not really necessary to agitate and fan flames IMO.

 

 

Whops - I said I was gonna stay out of BB discussions

Would you think we didn't need to see it if (lets say) Jim Davidson said the same thing?

Videostar
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

I sort of agree with this Olly. I don't think it was necessary for us to see it ......he could have been taken into the DR and told that it was unwise/unacceptable to make those remarks in case they may have been broadcast and could causev offence. It wasn't part of any larger conversation and it didn't link into a 'story line'. Not really necessary to agitate and fan flames IMO.

 

 

Whops - I said I was gonna stay out of BB discussions

Would you think we didn't need to see it if (lets say) Jim Davidson said the same thing?

That's a tricky one TBH. If it had been said in the same quiet one to one way that this conversation was conducted then yes I think my opinion would be the same. It had no connection with anything else going on - wasn't directed at anyone in particular and it was just one of many other conversations that took place. I think BB just love a bit of controversy and like to make the headlines ......being that it was a US contestant the headlines will go much further too.

 

I'm not 'iron clad' in my view on this TBH - it just seemed a bit unnecessary.

Soozy Woo
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

I sort of agree with this Olly. I don't think it was necessary for us to see it ......he could have been taken into the DR and told that it was unwise/unacceptable to make those remarks in case they may have been broadcast and could causev offence. It wasn't part of any larger conversation and it didn't link into a 'story line'. Not really necessary to agitate and fan flames IMO.

 

 

Whops - I said I was gonna stay out of BB discussions

Would you think we didn't need to see it if (lets say) Jim Davidson said the same thing?

I would feel exactly the same whoever it was, as it happens I detest boxing and any participants in that so called 'sport'  but if it was a private convo between two people and not relevant to any storyline or part of any other conversation going on and only shown for effect/headlines/sensationalism rather than anything else.. then yes regardless of whom said what I don't think it should be shown. .not to hide anything but it if you aren't going to follow thru with an educational debate then leave it to programmes that do that sort of thing..  

 

if it was going to be followed thru as a proper grown up discussion then yes bring it up, show it,  get the whole house discussing it, educate those people of a similar view who are also fans of the show.. .. but this is BB and proper grown up stuff doesn't happen on BB never mind serious debate ..

Mount Olympus *Olly*
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

I sort of agree with this Olly. I don't think it was necessary for us to see it ......he could have been taken into the DR and told that it was unwise/unacceptable to make those remarks in case they may have been broadcast and could causev offence. It wasn't part of any larger conversation and it didn't link into a 'story line'. Not really necessary to agitate and fan flames IMO.

 

 

Whops - I said I was gonna stay out of BB discussions

Would you think we didn't need to see it if (lets say) Jim Davidson said the same thing?

That's a tricky one TBH. If it had been said in the same quiet one to one way that this conversation was conducted then yes I think my opinion would be the same. It had no connection with anything else going on - wasn't directed at anyone in particular and it was just one of many other conversations that took place. I think BB just love a bit of controversy and like to make the headlines ......being that it was a US contestant the headlines will go much further too.

 

I'm not 'iron clad' in my view on this TBH - it just seemed a bit unnecessary.

I'm not iron clad in my opinion of this either to be honest. One of the reasons is that I have family that hold similar views and although I don't love them any less, I do kinda look at them with incredulity and a sort of pity. I allow for their age and where they were brought up (Ghana) and just let them carry on. The big difference is that most of their disdain is expressed within the confines of our own homes and not broadcast.

suzybean
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Videostar:
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:

I sort of agree with this Olly. I don't think it was necessary for us to see it ......he could have been taken into the DR and told that it was unwise/unacceptable to make those remarks in case they may have been broadcast and could causev offence. It wasn't part of any larger conversation and it didn't link into a 'story line'. Not really necessary to agitate and fan flames IMO.

 

 

Whops - I said I was gonna stay out of BB discussions

Would you think we didn't need to see it if (lets say) Jim Davidson said the same thing?

That's a tricky one TBH. If it had been said in the same quiet one to one way that this conversation was conducted then yes I think my opinion would be the same. It had no connection with anything else going on - wasn't directed at anyone in particular and it was just one of many other conversations that took place. I think BB just love a bit of controversy and like to make the headlines ......being that it was a US contestant the headlines will go much further too.

 

I'm not 'iron clad' in my view on this TBH - it just seemed a bit unnecessary.

Fair play to you...I think Im in agreement with you on this.

Videostar

 

Regarding the #BBUK HOMOPHOBIA controversy:
It is NOT about "Freedom of speech" or if "Evander is entitled to his opinion". People have no more choice in being homosexual than being black. 
Would Mr Holyfield tolerate derogatory comments about his race?

I'm glad that Channel 5 chose to broadcast this. The audience spend real money voting for these people, thus it is only fair that they know in advance what these “Celebs” in need of cash are REALLY like. 

No Evander Holifield, Homosexuality is NOT a “choice”. 
On the other hand being an ignorant bigot certainly IS...

Ps. I wonder if Mr Holyfield is really in a position to offer his bigoted views on morality & provide biblical quotes to justify them... You know after having 11 kids by 6 different women, several while still married.

MrsH
Originally Posted by MrsH:

 

Regarding the #BBUK HOMOPHOBIA controversy:
It is NOT about "Freedom of speech" or if "Evander is entitled to his opinion". People have no more choice in being homosexual than being black. 
Would Mr Holyfield tolerate derogatory comments about his race?

I'm glad that Channel 5 chose to broadcast this. The audience spend real money voting for these people, thus it is only fair that they know in advance what these “Celebs” in need of cash are REALLY like. 

No Evander Holifield, Homosexuality is NOT a “choice”. 
On the other hand being an ignorant bigot certainly IS...

Ps. I wonder if Mr Holyfield is really in a position to offer his bigoted views on morality & provide biblical quotes to justify them... You know after having 11 kids by 6 different women, several while still married.

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwww - the lovely, delectable Jerry - one of my all time favourite HM's.

Soozy Woo

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×