Originally Posted by Carnelian:
Why would you? (tin hat on) Michael Jackson was always an artist with an eye on the more superficial hype aspects of the industry. I'd go so far as to say that in the 80s and 90s, MJ was really a pre-teens' artist, with his emphasis on image and the big MTV video. I don't really care too much about Michael Jackson, who, to my mind, bought himself out of being jailed as a paedophile. Paedophilia accusations aside, I've never rated him as an artist of integrity or of any great creativity. Coming from what seems to be quite a cruel showbiz family, my view is that he just ended up being a victim of the "biz, they call - show!" perhaps made worse by a pretty dysfunctional early family life.
So, back to Amy Winehouse, yes, I think it's tragic that an artist with such unique vocal talent and such a free thinker took such a self destructive path and was clearly a victim of her demons.
I guess my post reads like a grief porn justification, but maybe I'm of more extreme view than you, Karma, while in my view, Amy Winehouse's very early death at 27 is tragedy, I found the veneration of MJ pretty appalling considering (in my mind at least) he was just as bad as Gary Glitter, but with much more impressive back-catalogue.
RIP Amy!
Articulate and distinct as always, Carnelian and bang on the money. The only difference for me is that I championed Jackson's work (everything up to, and including, Thriller - after that the skin got lighter, the oxygen chambers came out and he was clearly far too involved with his own press). I was never a screeching, over pretentious mega Jackson fan but always admired his work ethic and his achievements, however, the minute I saw him state he shares his bed with children (regardless of the disputed 'innocent' circumstances), my viewpoint immediately changed. And it would have changed whether Amy Winehouse, Luther Vandross or Martin Luther King had admitted to such an act. Convicted or not, I couldn't (and still can't) fathom how a grown man fails to see those actions were wrong and I also wonder how people can continue to support such a person, but each to their own I guess.
With Winehouse, yes, clearly she was an addict (or smackhead as some like to put it) - but for me she was in the same ball park as Hendrix, Cobain and Lynott, huge success but clearly quite damaged and fighting her personal demons. She didn't murder anyone, didn't sleep with children, as you said, she was a free spirit who expressed her hell through her music.
As for Gary Glitter - isn't even worthy of an analysis. Scum.