If she had her face made up with full slap I could understand but it's just eyelashes nothing else.
Reference:
Isn't it slightly ironic that the Daily Star call it a 'sick stunt' and then happily publish it?
That's the Daily Star for you, surely they are exploiting the picture and the child to sell more papers.
As I mentioned before, alot of mothers just want a mini-them, a daughter who is just an extension of themselves. They think nothing of letting their littles girls wear cropped tops, bras, thongs, high heels, make-up and actually go out like that. It is shocking that parents would encourage and allow this. It is entirely different letting your child wear a bit of make-up and dress in your clothes, but some parents take it too far.
I agree with you there LL, some of the things i see 11-14yr olds wearing is shocking! I feel kids grow up far to quickly 'nowadays' (hate using that term make me feel old!) They don't have enough time to be innocent and care free any more. And as you have pointed out there is a difference between playing with make-up and actually wearing make-up at a young age and dressing like something from a music video (which i hold partly to blame btw)
I'm not keen on the thought of a 2 year old wearing false eyelashes to be honest. My daughter will be two in April and I would find it abhorrent if someone put false eyelashes on her. 
i think the reaction is out of all balance with the perceived 'cime'.looks to me like a mum and daughter having a laugh and sending the pic to auntie, to coo and chuckle over too.
if the aunt was dappy enough to post it on fb then have a go at her.
if the aunt was dappy enough to post it on fb then have a go at her.
anybody remember the days where you took family photo's and they stayed just that, for family and close friends to view. . sweet or embarrassing or whatever they were like, but not for the whole bloomin worlds eyes..
I think that is half the problem.. too much access to private stuff on the interweb nowadays.. was bad enough when mum took out your nekkid baby photo to show the new BF.. imagine all them mums now plastering them all over the place for all and sundry to view..
and thru that plastering of pics it feeds the sicko's out there as well. .I don't profess to know how their brains work but pre interweb days they could easily be spotted gawping at kids, and shoo'd away or reported, cos they were often outside playgrounds, parks and schools.. now they don't need to do that they can surf away to their hearts content at home gawping [and doing gawd knows what in the process] at the kiddie pics online that are proudly posted up by parents or relatives..
I think that is half the problem.. too much access to private stuff on the interweb nowadays.. was bad enough when mum took out your nekkid baby photo to show the new BF.. imagine all them mums now plastering them all over the place for all and sundry to view..
and thru that plastering of pics it feeds the sicko's out there as well. .I don't profess to know how their brains work but pre interweb days they could easily be spotted gawping at kids, and shoo'd away or reported, cos they were often outside playgrounds, parks and schools.. now they don't need to do that they can surf away to their hearts content at home gawping [and doing gawd knows what in the process] at the kiddie pics online that are proudly posted up by parents or relatives..
Reference:
anybody remember the days where you took family photo's and they stayed just that, for family and close friends to view. .
LOL - i remember those days... however, many of my old family pics are now on my facebook page!
ah but is open to all and sundry or just friends? by which I mean proper friends not any old add on 
ps does it also include your nekkid baby pic too? 
I don't have any pics on the likes of FB of either family or friends...there's a nice one of a squirrel however
Come on Kong! Knock some sense into him 
I dont see anything wrong whatsoever with that photo. Most little girls are fascinating by makeup and nail varnish etc and love to copy their mums. Why SHOULD we stop our children from doing that or STOP taking photos of them with makeup on even if they do end up accidentally in the public domain?? Paedos "sexualise" all young children whether they're wearing makeup or not and we should remember that they are in a small minority thank god. Are we to demonise adults who photograph their children in public places? Of course not ......but it seems due to high levels of paranoia regarding paedophiles that cameras are now banned from school nativity plays and sports days. Are children some kind of forbidden, X-rated presence that need to be hidden from public view just in case a paedo might clock eyes on them? All we will end up doing is tainting our relationship with our kids while at the same time perverting their attitudes to adults 
Reference:
Mount Olympus offline 1265 Forum Posts Today at 3:47 PM (Edited: ) anybody remember the days where you took family photo's and they stayed just that, for family and close friends to view. . sweet or embarrassing or whatever they were like, but not for the whole bloomin worlds eyes.. I think that is half the problem.. too much access to private stuff on the interweb nowadays.. was bad enough when mum took out your nekkid baby photo to show the new BF.. imagine all them mums now plastering them all over the place for all and sundry to view.. and thru that plastering of pics it feeds the sicko's out there as well. .I don't profess to know how their brains work but pre interweb days they could easily be spotted gawping at kids, and shoo'd away or reported, cos they were often outside playgrounds, parks and schools.. now they don't need to do that they can surf away to their hearts content at home gawping [and doing gawd knows what in the process] at the kiddie pics online that are proudly posted up by parents or relatives..
Exactly Olly. I can understand posting pics of your child for friends and family to see, but on a public social networking place? Never and I don't understand people that do. Have they never heard of Photo-Shop? People can do almost anything nowadays with a photo and even though we don't like to think that it goes on and even though it might only be a minority of sickos doing it, it happens. People should be more aware, care more and be very careful who they share their private pics with. It might be paranoia to some, but I would rather be safe then sorry.
cracking post tequila.
Who cares if someones pics get photshopped?
If i never saw it or knew about it it wouldn't bother me.
Reference:
Croc online 6182 Forum Posts Today at 6:31 PM (Edited: ) Who cares if someones pics get photshopped? If i never saw it or knew about it it wouldn't bother me.
Perhaps if it were a child of yours, you might.
well, i am not taking any more pics of my mates baby when they go swimming, never know who's lurking about in the processing dept.
How could I be bothered if I didn't know?
Whilst not being pleasant that really doesn't hurt anyone.
Whilst not being pleasant that really doesn't hurt anyone.
in fact that bloke with the ginger hair and a lisp behind the counter in jessops looks pretty shifty too.
Of course those inclined can do anything with a photo.......that's my point. The least they can do with the aid of photo shop is add makeup. What happens in the summer when our children are happily playing on the beach half naked? Do you really think there is less chance of them being snapped by some paedo than there is of their pic getting into the wrong hands on the internet? Do we ensure we cover up our kids at ALL times when out in public places because we "care" more?
good point tequila, i'm going to dress mine in a barrel until she's at least 38.
Reference:
Do we ensure we cover up our kids at ALL times when out in public places because we "care" more?
Do that and you may as well take their childhoods away completely
TBH I don't see what the big deal is about either....I have no time for Katie Price but by the same token do recognise some folks dislike/loathing of her seems to over-ride everything she does.
Reference:
How could I be bothered if I didn't know? Whilst not being pleasant that really doesn't hurt anyone.
Exactly Croc Maybe taking photos is the way he diverts his desires from more dangerous activities. Certainly people like him will need some way of managing their inclinations. Bang them up as much as you like, but eventually they will still have to re-enter society and live alongside your children.
can't stand the woman myself lee, wish some one would keep her in a barrel.
Reference:
'm going to dress mine in a barrel until she's at least 38
Its the only way Jackson 
.............poor kid Reference:
can't stand the woman myself lee, wish some one would keep her in a barrel
Her and that sickly sweet ex of hers Andre.....Ooooh JB we could then roll out the barrels.
i have photos of my eldest in my high heel boots and makeup..after he raided my makeup bag and shoe rack at the age of 2
i dont put it on FB though....but i will be saving it for HIS future girlfriends/boyfriends though
i dont put it on FB though....but i will be saving it for HIS future girlfriends/boyfriends though
Reference:
Darthhoob offline 2039 Forum Posts Today at 6:51 PM (Edited: ) i have photos of my eldest in my high heel boots and makeup..after he raided my makeup bag and shoe rack at the age of 2 i dont put it on FB though....but i will be saving it for HIS future girlfriends/boyfriends though
They'd have had a field day with my eldest son, he's 29 now but as a small child everywhere he went he stripped off naked. Shops, Legoland, Thorpe park, Chessington, holidays, back of the car, he was a nightmare.
Reference:
Tequila offline 1212 Forum Posts Today at 09:57 (Edited: ) I dont see anything wrong whatsoever with that photo. Most little girls are fascinating by makeup and nail varnish etc and love to copy their mums. Why SHOULD we stop our children from doing that or STOP taking photos of them with makeup on even if they do end up accidentally in the public domain?? Paedos "sexualise" all young children whether they're wearing makeup or not and we should remember that they are in a small minority thank god. Are we to demonise adults who photograph their children in public places? Of course not ......but it seems due to high levels of paranoia regarding paedophiles that cameras are now banned from school nativity plays and sports days. Are children some kind of forbidden, X-rated presence that need to be hidden from public view just in case a paedo might clock eyes on them? All we will end up doing is tainting our relationship with our kids while at the same time perverting their attitudes to adults
only thing i didn't like about the pic was..she looked bloody stupid
and lashes could be some sort of 'danger' (never used fake lashes so dunno what is involved with putting them on..glue or something?).Reference:
i have photos of my eldest in my high heel boots and makeup..after he raided my makeup bag and shoe rack at the age of 2 i dont put it on FB though....but i will be saving it for HIS future girlfriends/boyfriends though
Darthy how are you and Lucas?.... Congratulations btw.
i used to pee on my mate's mum's rosebushes, just cos i could.
Reference:
~Lee~ offline 2117 Forum Posts Today at 11:03 (Edited: ) Reference: i have photos of my eldest in my high heel boots and makeup..after he raided my makeup bag and shoe rack at the age of 2 i dont put it on FB though....but i will be saving it for HIS future girlfriends/boyfriends though Darthy how are you and Lucas?.... Congratulations btw.
ello lee 
we are ok ta 
Lucas is well behaved...keep forgetting he is even here ...then the boob, aches and other aches remind me LOL. have to actually wake him up for a feed most of the time 
very laid back. Aww bless him....If he's anything like his brothers I'm sure he's a little beauty....Take care of yourself Darthy who knows he may wake up with a bang.
I wish her and her whole bleedin' entourage would just booger off.
Peter has his say, naturally:
http://uk.tv.yahoo.com/blog/article/405008/
Reference:
ah but is open to all and sundry or just friends? by which I mean proper friends not any old add on
Other than my profile picture i think all of my information is set to friends only - of which i currently have 52.
Reference:
ps does it also include your nekkid baby pic too?
This might explain why my friends list is decreasing rather than increasing!
