Can I make a suggestion ....if we are self governing .....and in order to clarify things ( and prevent a repeat of this in future ) ....maybe we should hold a referendum .....someone could do a poll ....something along the lines of *Should the term spoiler be restricted to nominations , evictions and finalist results * .....or however they wanted to word it. Just a thought .
Very good idea , Baz . I wouldnt know how to do it. Somebody will, i am sure
I'm sure they will Skykark I just think it should be kept simple ....maybe Should all BB information be deemed a spoiler prior to the HL show airing * ?
See.. I disagree already - that's too vague, despite what's been said, the only things I've seen that people think should be spoilers are chuck/walk out and warnings. If you say all info, you're obviously going to get the no vote.
From what I see in the polls, you can post several options.
how about giving the option of
noms and evictions - which I think everyone agrees on
noms, evictions, walker and throw outs
noms, evictions, walkers, throw outs and warnings
Noms, evictions, warnings.
Everything
Nothing
there seems to be an option for people to make suggestions too.
Lol .... I think that would make us all a bit Kaffs And you can bet your bottom dollar something that wasn't on the list ( like my new thread) would pop up and rock the boat I really think it has to be more simple than that ...but that's just me
Well.. doing it the other way gives no option for people being chucked out to be classed as a spoiler because I don't think anyone has said that nothing should be openly discussed. It would be pretty much hobson's choice with one question.
I think Skylark's suggestion ^^^ might cover that Kaffy