Feckin mentol.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I would call that denial slim 
The front - truly unbelievable 
He said something along the lines of 'Politicians should go where the people are.'
So, we must all be sitting in the Australian jungle then! 
@slimfern posted:He said he is doing it to bring awareness to some good cause...can't remember what it is...wasn't really paying much attention
Nothing to do with the book that heâs got coming out, then? ð
@JustOneMoreThing posted:Nothing to do with the book that heâs got coming out, then? ð
Didn't know he had one...what's it called...''My life as a Class A Asshole'' 
@slimfern posted:Didn't know he had one...what's it called...''My life as a Class A Asshole''
ð Apparently itâs a book about the Covid pandemic from his perspective (so probably full of lies).
Imagine the horror when people wake on Christmas morning and find that pile of shite in their stocking
@slimfern posted:Didn't know he had one...what's it called...''My life as a Class A Asshole''
@JustOneMoreThing posted:ð Apparently itâs a book about the Covid pandemic from his perspective (so probably full of lies).
Imagine the horror when people wake on Christmas morning and find that pile of shite in their stocking
ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢððŧððŧððŧ
@JustOneMoreThing posted:ð Apparently itâs a book about the Covid pandemic from his perspective (so probably full of lies).
Imagine the horror when people wake on Christmas morning and find that pile of shite in their stocking
Ideal fuel for the log burner...will help to keep the gas bill down
At least when he's chowing down on kangaroo anuses he's not doing politics!
@Carnelian posted:At least when he's chowing down on kangaroo anuses he's not doing politics!
Very true Carnelian âĶ.
To be fair, the guy 'implemented' a primary/functional reaction to the 'National requirements' that would (perhaps) counter the propogation of the 'pandemic' generated by the COVID 19 'pandemic', but he 'fell in love'!??
Whatever his 'Parliamentary Post' following his 'whip withdrawal', this guy was 'in love'! 
Give me all the 'eyes' that you want to @ slimfern, but 'Parliamentary Obligation' can 'really bugger up' your personal life.
The 5yr period for the active 'governmental life time' may well be responsible for this.
A means of/for the 'election' for 'the masses' should be re-instated for a 'government' that isn't 'cogent' to produce a 'governmental eui
yivyiyiqiyyi
@suricat posted:Give me all the 'eyes' that you want to @ slimfern, but 'Parliamentary Obligation' can 'really bugger up' your personal life.
The 5yr period for the active 'governmental life time' may well be responsible for this.
A means of/for the 'election' for 'the masses' should be re-instated for a 'government' that isn't 'cogent' to produce a 'governmental eui
yivyiyiqiyyi
Are you talking from experience there Suricat?
My 'eyes' were focused on your comment about him being in love....wasn't he already married at the time ...not a good look for anyone 
I concur. I also apologise for the inappropriate end to my last posting. Something (I don't know what) went wrong.
As a divorcee I can understand how pressures from a work ethic can influence emotional attachments. As the instigator of my divorce I also understand that these pressures against the marriage of a couple can overcome the matrimonial bond. To be frank, I couldn't abide with my wife 'sleeping around' with other guys.
That being said, nature does what nature does.
Kind regards, Ray Dart (AKA suricat)
@suricat posted:I concur. I also apologise for the inappropriate end to my last posting. Something (I don't know what) went wrong.
As a divorcee I can understand how pressures from a work ethic can influence emotional attachments. As the instigator of my divorce I also understand that these pressures against the marriage of a couple can overcome the matrimonial bond. To be frank, I couldn't abide with my wife 'sleeping around' with other guys.
That being said, nature does what nature does.
Kind regards, Ray Dart (AKA suricat)
No worries, although I did wonder whether you might have been cussing me in code 
I understand that we are all animals, but as humans we have the ability to show restraint amongst other things.
@slimfern posted:No worries, although I did wonder whether you might have been cussing me in code
I understand that we are all animals, but as humans we have the ability to show restraint amongst other things.
I don't know any 'cussing code' and if I did, I'm not sure that anyone would understand it. T.B.H. , I dropped my glasses case on the keyboard, everything went haywire and the thing 'posted itself' when I had to be 'elsewhere'. 
I was referring to 'human nature'.
AFAIK animals act 'mostly' on a 'hormonal instinct' that builds a 'chemical memory' that induces repetitive behavioural patterns. However, some of the 'higher species' are able to 'problem solve' on a 'basic level', this allows them to 'innovate' in situations they've not encountered before, or they've 'witnessed' the 'scenario' with its 'outcome'. This may be because their action may have 'failed' the outcome they anticipated following a previous encounter, or they 'actually witnessed' the 'encounter' during a scenario they were not involved in, or they just 'got lucky', or they actually 'worked it out' (one chimpanzee must have educated other 'chimps' to 'poke a stick' into an 'ant nest' to get 'food').
Whereas we humans have evolved a 'more complex method of communication' (language) that enables us to 'educate' other humans of varying 'scenarios', 'actions' and 'outcomes', but this mode of communication is 'so complex' that it can also lead to 'misinterpretation' due to 'incomplete disclosure', "double'entendre" (double [more than one] meaning) and 'local slang' (regional differentiation).
I don't know 'anything' about Matt Hancock's 'marital relations' at the time that he was 'observed on camera', but he 'was married' and 'human'. How could you 'know' that he was 'actually' (as you imply) 'cheating on his wife'? Please 'tell us' (unfortunately, we only have 'language' to communicate here) and 'keep it simple'!
He did well in getting stars though. I'll have to watch this more often.
Kind regards, Ray Dart (AKA suricat).
@Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing posted:He said something along the lines of 'Politicians should go where the people are.'
So, we must all be sitting in the Australian jungle then!
No EFFT! The 'Australian Jungle' is being 'brought to us' via "I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here"!
The "Australian Jungle" is an 'insight' to us of/for the 'camp-mates' that can make up the 'current group' of inmates/competitors that are 'able/unable' to achieve the 'task at hand' (I shouldn't need to emphasise this).
IMHO Matt Hancock has the 'highest rate' of 'star collection' (camp stars) that 'feed the camp'. Thus, should be 'camp leader' (as he now, currently, 'is' [now 'was']).
'Irony' only 'hides' the 'meaning' of your posts. "He said something along the lines of" isn't a 'positive' comment, it's a comment that's 'fishing' for 'information' from other posters
Please "say what you mean" and "mean what you say"!
Kind regards, Ray Dart (AKA suricat).
@velvet donkey this is your 'thread' so please give 'your thoughts'!
Kindest regards, Ray Dart (AKA suricat).
Matt should be 'at home'! Representing his 'constituents' for their needs and not furthering his identity as an individual for 'change' in a race for 'identity recognition'!
I'll say no more!
Ray Dart (AKA suricat)
I was no fan of his before he went into the jungle , but the way the bullies (especially Charlene, BG, Sue , and Chris ) have treated him, and the way heâs dealt with it since he went in there , Iâm now down to hoping he stays there longer than they do âĶ.and I wouldnât be unhappy if he actually wins .
@Baz posted:I was no fan of his before he went into the jungle , but the way the bullies (especially Charlene, BG, Sue , and Chris ) have treated him, and the way heâs dealt with it since he went in there , Iâm now down to hoping he stays there longer than they do âĶ.and I wouldnât be unhappy if he actually wins .
@suricat posted:I don't know any 'cussing code' and if I did, I'm not sure that anyone would understand it. T.B.H. , I dropped my glasses case on the keyboard, everything went haywire and the thing 'posted itself' when I had to be 'elsewhere'.
I was referring to 'human nature'.
I don't know 'anything' about Matt Hancock's 'marital relations' at the time that he was 'observed on camera', but he 'was married' and 'human'. How could you 'know' that he was 'actually' (as you imply) 'cheating on his wife'? Please 'tell us' (unfortunately, we only have 'language' to communicate here) and 'keep it simple'!
He did well in getting stars though. I'll have to watch this more often.
Kind regards, Ray Dart (AKA suricat).
Fair enough...however, my response was in a joking form, but then possibly humour is as regional as accents...
As for animal behaviour, well I, as have most on here, watched Richard Attenbourough, if not seen first hand in our life times such things. No teaching needed here thanks!
And I cetainly don't need anyone lecturing me on human behaviour!
I haven't, nor do I intend to, watch 'I'm a celebrity get me out of here'....it's not my cup of tea.
I do though watch and see comments and reports on such things as; On 25 June 2021, it was revealed that Hancock had breached COVID-19 social distancing restrictions with Gina Coladangelo, an adviser in the Department of Health and Social Care with whom he was having an extramarital affair, after CCTV images of him kissing and embracing her in his Whitehall office.
However, I do commend him for...During the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Hancock welcomed seven Ukrainian refugees into his family home in Suffolk in May 2022 through the Homes for Ukraine scheme. (for whatever reason).
Though possibly that reason, or why he is now in the jungle is:...In April 2022, it was announced that Hancock would publish his diaries during the COVID-19 pandemic called Pandemic Diaries with Biteback Publishing. It is due to be released in December 2022.
The royalties are to be donated to NHS charities <<< 
Who knows....Mine is just an opinion based on what I see and read, as is yours.
Unless you know otherwise..
@slimfern posted:Fair enough...however, my response was in a joking form, but then possibly humour is as regional as accents...
As for animal behaviour, well I, as have most on here, watched Richard Attenbourough, if not seen first hand in our life times such things. No teaching needed here thanks!
And I cetainly don't need anyone lecturing me on human behaviour!
I haven't, nor do I intend to, watch 'I'm a celebrity get me out of here'....it's not my cup of tea.
I do though watch and see comments and reports on such things as; On 25 June 2021, it was revealed that Hancock had breached COVID-19 social distancing restrictions with Gina Coladangelo, an adviser in the Department of Health and Social Care with whom he was having an extramarital affair, after CCTV images of him kissing and embracing her in his Whitehall office.However, I do commend him for...During the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Hancock welcomed seven Ukrainian refugees into his family home in Suffolk in May 2022 through the Homes for Ukraine scheme. (for whatever reason).
Though possibly that reason, or why he is now in the jungle is:...In April 2022, it was announced that Hancock would publish his diaries during the COVID-19 pandemic called Pandemic Diaries with Biteback Publishing. It is due to be released in December 2022.
The royalties are to be donated to NHS charities <<<
Who knows....Mine is just an opinion based on what I see and read, as is yoinput iurs.
Unless you know otherwise..
I 'grew up' in W3 London, but my Mum and Dad grew up in the NE of England. This lead to an 'in-congruency' for 'lingual understanding' between the 'familial' and the 'observed linguistic', so I'm conversant with most "accents" of the UK.
I do understand some 'Celtic' phrases, but 'English' is my main method of 'verbal' and 'written' 'communications'
"Richard Attenborough" doesn't even enter into this 'scenario'! It's all about the 'interaction' between the 'camp-mates'.
However, Thank you for your input.
I'm out of here!
One final message@slimfern.
When you say that "I haven't, nor do I intend to, watch 'I'm a celebrity get me out of here'....it's not my cup of tea.".
Why are you posting here???
Your dialogue is under suspicion to me and I refuse to continue any further dialogue with you!
Think for a moment Suricat. This thread is about Matt Hancock going into the jungle, but NOT about IACGMOOH itself. Therefore, there is no reason for Slim NOT to post in this thread.
@Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing posted:Think for a moment Suricat. This thread is about Matt Hancock going into the jungle, but NOT about IACGMOOH itself. Therefore, there is no reason for Slim NOT to post in this thread.
My 'handle' is 'suricat' and not 'Suricat'!
IMO Matt Hancock should have concentrated on the people that he purported to represent when he delivered himself up for election. Nuf said!
I now re-realise the reason that I decided to stop posting on this site a couple of decades ago.
Good bye!
@suricat posted:I now re-realise the reason that I decided to stop posting on this site a couple of decades ago.
Good bye!
Hang around suricat - maybe it's just the subject matter
I've done and said a few wild things on here believe me. Regret them too but we move on. Decent bunch on here really 