Yogi19 posted:

Carnelian posted:

Yogi19 posted:

Labour supporter slags off Tory Govenment shocker. 

 

1.That is what Labour supporters tend to do.  If Hawking thought the Tories were great he'd be a Tory!  You know, like  Clarkson, Jim Davidson, Baronesse Bra and the repugnant Katie Hopkins 

 

2.Yogi19: Tory supporter dismisses criticism by a considerable intellectual superior to him/herself and 3.someone who has first hand experience of the NHS and appreciates its role in his life.  But hey, Yogi19 thinks Hawking's views are invalid because he recently came out in favour of Labour.

 

4.Are Tory voters the only 'legitimate' critiques of this minority government?

 

5.Have you ever thought that the reason Hawking doesn't support your favourite party on this is because he understands and has first hand experience of what the NHS has done for him and the dangers in flogging it all off to private concerns?

 

BiB:

1. Well colour me shocked! That was my point, no surprise there!

2. I'm female, and miaow, you need to be careful, your claws are showing.

3. If you knew anything about me - which you obviously don't - you'd know I have had almost two decades of first hand experience of the NHS for a chronic and debilitating illness. I grant you, nothing as horrendous as MND but I am not without experience of the failings of the NHS - under both Labour and Tory governments.

4. No and I never said they were.

5. I'm sure he has several reasons for his political party of choice, as do most people.

 

 

 

1. Hawking is not exactly the typical Labour voter.  He's come out in favour of Labour because he believes the Tories are wrecking the NHS.  As do I.

2. So what about Hawking's views makes you dismiss them?  I assume you'd concede that Hawking is your intellectual superior and has come to his conclusions by logic and experience - and his opinions can't just be dismissed by 'well, that's just what a leftie luvvie would say'?

3. Fair enough, so why the hostility to Hawking?  

4. yep

5. I'm sure he does, but he's a very rich man who like most rich men would naturally gravitate to selfishness and Tory support.  He hasn't, so he's one of few, he's an aberration among his group.  

The Theory of Everything bopic of Stephen Hawking gets its terrestrial premiere on ITV on Monday at 9pm,

El Loro posted:

The Theory of Everything bopic of Stephen Hawking gets its terrestrial premiere on ITV on Monday at 9pm,

That might go some way to explaining the timing , eh El 

Carnelian posted:

Yogi19 posted:

Carnelian posted:

Yogi19 posted:

Labour supporter slags off Tory Govenment shocker. 

 

1.That is what Labour supporters tend to do.  If Hawking thought the Tories were great he'd be a Tory!  You know, like  Clarkson, Jim Davidson, Baronesse Bra and the repugnant Katie Hopkins 

 

2.Yogi19: Tory supporter dismisses criticism by a considerable intellectual superior to him/herself and 3.someone who has first hand experience of the NHS and appreciates its role in his life.  But hey, Yogi19 thinks Hawking's views are invalid because he recently came out in favour of Labour.

 

4.Are Tory voters the only 'legitimate' critiques of this minority government?

 

5.Have you ever thought that the reason Hawking doesn't support your favourite party on this is because he understands and has first hand experience of what the NHS has done for him and the dangers in flogging it all off to private concerns?

 

BiB:

1. Well colour me shocked! That was my point, no surprise there!

2. I'm female, and miaow, you need to be careful, your claws are showing.

3. If you knew anything about me - which you obviously don't - you'd know I have had almost two decades of first hand experience of the NHS for a chronic and debilitating illness. I grant you, nothing as horrendous as MND but I am not without experience of the failings of the NHS - under both Labour and Tory governments.

4. No and I never said they were.

5. I'm sure he has several reasons for his political party of choice, as do most people.

 

 

 

1. Hawking is not exactly the typical Labour voter.  He's come out in favour of Labour because he believes the Tories are wrecking the NHS.  As do I.

 

2. So what about Hawking's views makes you dismiss them?  I assume you'd concede that Hawking is your intellectual superior and has come to his conclusions by logic and experience - and his opinions can't just be dismissed by 'well, that's just what a leftie luvvie would say'?

 

3. Fair enough, so why the hostility to Hawking?  

 

4. yep

 

5. I'm sure he does, but he's a very rich man who like most rich men would naturally gravitate to selfishness and Tory support.  He hasn't, so he's one of few, he's an aberration among his group.  

 

1. In this day and age, things have moved on and he's hardly an atypical Labour supporter. There are plenty of wealthy people who have tied their flag to the Labour Party mast - just as some people from working class backgrounds now support the Tories.

2. There is no doubt that Stephen Hawking has an incredible intellect, that doesn't mean I have to agree with every opinion he proffers.

3. You appear to be associating a difference of opinion, with hostility. I find it perfectly easy to respect someone and yet disagree on certain topics.

Absolutely no hostility coming from me towards Stephen Hawking. I have a great admiration for his intellect and great sympathy for the way he has been affected by MND.

4. Nope 

5. There seem to be plenty of rich men within the Labour Party. I remind you of the multi millionaire El Milliband and the 7 millionaires who were in his Shadow Cabinet and the many rich people who are Labour Party supporters, so Stephen Hawking is hardly an aberration.

Yogi19 posted:

Carnelian posted:

Yogi19 posted:

Carnelian posted:

Yogi19 posted:

Labour supporter slags off Tory Govenment shocker. 

 

1.That is what Labour supporters tend to do.  If Hawking thought the Tories were great he'd be a Tory!  You know, like  Clarkson, Jim Davidson, Baronesse Bra and the repugnant Katie Hopkins 

 

2.Yogi19: Tory supporter dismisses criticism by a considerable intellectual superior to him/herself and 3.someone who has first hand experience of the NHS and appreciates its role in his life.  But hey, Yogi19 thinks Hawking's views are invalid because he recently came out in favour of Labour.

 

4.Are Tory voters the only 'legitimate' critiques of this minority government?

 

5.Have you ever thought that the reason Hawking doesn't support your favourite party on this is because he understands and has first hand experience of what the NHS has done for him and the dangers in flogging it all off to private concerns?

 

BiB:

1. Well colour me shocked! That was my point, no surprise there!

2. I'm female, and miaow, you need to be careful, your claws are showing.

3. If you knew anything about me - which you obviously don't - you'd know I have had almost two decades of first hand experience of the NHS for a chronic and debilitating illness. I grant you, nothing as horrendous as MND but I am not without experience of the failings of the NHS - under both Labour and Tory governments.

4. No and I never said they were.

5. I'm sure he has several reasons for his political party of choice, as do most people.

 

 

 

1. Hawking is not exactly the typical Labour voter.  He's come out in favour of Labour because he believes the Tories are wrecking the NHS.  As do I.

 

2. So what about Hawking's views makes you dismiss them?  I assume you'd concede that Hawking is your intellectual superior and has come to his conclusions by logic and experience - and his opinions can't just be dismissed by 'well, that's just what a leftie luvvie would say'?

 

3. Fair enough, so why the hostility to Hawking?  

 

4. yep

 

5. I'm sure he does, but he's a very rich man who like most rich men would naturally gravitate to selfishness and Tory support.  He hasn't, so he's one of few, he's an aberration among his group.  

 

1. In this day and age, things have moved on and he's hardly an atypical Labour supporter. There are plenty of wealthy people who have tied their flag to the Labour Party mast - just as some people from working class backgrounds now support the Tories.

2. There is no doubt that Stephen Hawking has an incredible intellect, that doesn't mean I have to agree with every opinion he proffers.

3. You appear to be associating a difference of opinion, with hostility. I find it perfectly easy to respect someone and yet disagree on certain topics.

Absolutely no hostility coming from me towards Stephen Hawking. I have a great admiration for his intellect and great sympathy for the way he has been affected by MND.

4. Nope 

5. There seem to be plenty of rich men within the Labour Party. I remind you of the multi millionaire El Milliband and the 7 millionaires who were in his Shadow Cabinet and the many rich people who are Labour Party supporters, so Stephen Hawking is hardly an aberration.

 

And JC hardly comes from an underprivileged background either 

It's not letting me clear quotes......I suspect because they've gone too far  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Corbyn

Sprout posted:

It's not letting me clear quotes......I suspect because they've gone too far  

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Corbyn

 

Like I said , hardly underprivileged ....private school etc. ....never had a *working mans  * job .....and reading his political past simply confirms my dislike of him I'm afraid .  

Attention-seeker and all round annoyance Stephen Hawkings is at it again.

This time creating a pseudo double act with none other than SCARLETT MOFFATT !!!

She's had a revelation about the pyramids and tried to contact Hawking - he ignored the tiny twit.

THEN she won IACGMOH

Suddenly the celebrity hungry headline grabber decided to reply,

"'Scarlett tried to contact him before the jungle, but got no reply,'' a source told The Sun On Sunday. "So she was staggered when, after she spoke, he got in touch and admitted her theory could well be right."

I'd like to push him down an escalator  ... to test the theory of time and motion.

velvet donkey posted:

You do know CI5 will have this  ^^  on Amber Rudd's desk by nine tomorrow morning     

 You could be right, Velvet.

velvet donkey posted:

You do know CI5 will have this  ^^  on Amber Rudd's desk by nine tomorrow morning     

Saint posted:

Attention-seeker and all round annoyance Stephen Hawkings is at it again.

This time creating a pseudo double act with none other than SCARLETT MOFFATT !!!

She's had a revelation about the pyramids and tried to contact Hawking - he ignored the tiny twit.

THEN she won IACGMOH

Suddenly the celebrity hungry headline grabber decided to reply,

"'Scarlett tried to contact him before the jungle, but got no reply,'' a source told The Sun On Sunday. "So she was staggered when, after she spoke, he got in touch and admitted her theory could well be right."

 

I'd like to push him down an escalator  ... to test the theory of time and motion.

 

What was Scarlett's theory about the pyramids?

Yogi19 posted:

Saint posted:

Attention-seeker and all round annoyance Stephen Hawkings is at it again.

This time creating a pseudo double act with none other than SCARLETT MOFFATT !!!

She's had a revelation about the pyramids and tried to contact Hawking - he ignored the tiny twit.

THEN she won IACGMOH

Suddenly the celebrity hungry headline grabber decided to reply,

"'Scarlett tried to contact him before the jungle, but got no reply,'' a source told The Sun On Sunday. "So she was staggered when, after she spoke, he got in touch and admitted her theory could well be right."

 

I'd like to push him down an escalator  ... to test the theory of time and motion.

 

What was Scarlett's theory about the pyramids?

She probably thinks they were a prop for an ancient reality show 

Baz posted:

Yogi19 posted:

Saint posted:

Attention-seeker and all round annoyance Stephen Hawkings is at it again.

This time creating a pseudo double act with none other than SCARLETT MOFFATT !!!

She's had a revelation about the pyramids and tried to contact Hawking - he ignored the tiny twit.

THEN she won IACGMOH

Suddenly the celebrity hungry headline grabber decided to reply,

"'Scarlett tried to contact him before the jungle, but got no reply,'' a source told The Sun On Sunday. "So she was staggered when, after she spoke, he got in touch and admitted her theory could well be right."

 

I'd like to push him down an escalator  ... to test the theory of time and motion.

 

What was Scarlett's theory about the pyramids?

She probably thinks they were a prop for an ancient reality show 

ROFL 

THEORY

I'm A Celebrity winner Scarlett said in the jungle earlier this year: 'In order to travel back in time we have to go faster than light.

'The speed of light is the same latitude point as the tip of the great pyramid.

'So I think someone from the future realised we'd need the pyramids and went back in time and built them.''

Surely a chicken and egg theory there 

Saint posted:

THEORY

I'm A Celebrity winner Scarlett said in the jungle earlier this year: 'In order to travel back in time we have to go faster than light.

'The speed of light is the same latitude point as the tip of the great pyramid.

'So I think someone from the future realised we'd need the pyramids and went back in time and built them.''

 

Surely a chicken and egg theory there 

Lmao 

Saint posted:

THEORY

I'm A Celebrity winner Scarlett said in the jungle earlier this year: 'In order to travel back in time we have to go faster than light.

'The speed of light is the same latitude point as the tip of the great pyramid.

'So I think someone from the future realised we'd need the pyramids and went back in time and built them.''

 

Surely a chicken and egg theory there 

Knackered wheelchair warrior Hawking can't help but get involved with the crackpot midget.

After all the biggest news in science recently was that the hadron Collider broke when it collided with something 

Saint posted:

Knackered wheelchair warrior Hawking can't help but get involved with the crackpot midget.

After all the biggest news in science recently was that the hadron Collider broke when it collided with something 

 

Saint posted:

Knackered wheelchair warrior Hawking can't help but get involved with the crackpot midget.

After all the biggest news in science recently was that the hadron Collider broke when it collided with something 

 

Saint posted:

Knackered wheelchair warrior Hawking can't help but get involved with the crackpot midget.

After all the biggest news in science recently was that the hadron Collider broke when it collided with something 

 

You really are a loathsome individual  

So block me - I dare you 

Wheelchair Warrior Hawking is at it again

It must be a slow year cos he's searching for attention whilst contradicting himself - nothing new there ...

He's had 'public heated debates' claiming the Higgs particle would never be found (even betting money) only to accept it had been found.

He came to science attention by theories regarding black holes only to later say some of his ideas were the worst mistakes he'd ever made, professionally.

And now he's claiming Artificial Intelligence could replace humans altogether,

http://www.ibtimes.com/stephen...her-2610234?ft=95p2z

even writing to the Gov in March 2017 to ask them to pass regulation to slow down progress.

Whilst in Nov 2016 he attended the opening of the AI Centre in Cambridge where AI will be researched and developed 

No wonder his wife left him out in the sun - probably to shut him up (allegedly)

Knackered know-it-all Hawking is at it again, in Beijing.

Total celebrity focused attention seeker who only ever talks hypothetically cos it let's him talk and talk.

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/...miR2Z&ocid=ientp

I'm gonna push him in a pond to see how he hypothetically swims

He's at it AGAIN !!!

Attention seeking automaton and part Maccano Man says we're all gonna die in a fire ball !!!! http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/...PWjQ&ocid=SMSDHP

Sadly this is nothing new.

He's cloaked old news in new terror.

We're all gonna die in 600yrs time - so that more or less makes his point null and void - so we'd better start thinking of how to leave planet Earth and travel to a new world.

Yep that old chestnut

So he's trying to gain even more attention by scaring people.

I'm coining a new phrase for the likes of Hawking - it's called 'fake terror'.

I'll fall short of calling him a terrorist - even though the aim of terrorism is to create terror - and thus pretty apt for what he's trying to do here.

You really don’t like him , do you 

Nor do his scientific contemporaries if the truth be known.

TBH he just annoys me a bit - so I delight in pointing out that he's offering nothing concrete/helpful/different  .... it's all hollow razzmatazz.

He's famous not for his work - he's famous cos he's disabled

Saint posted:

Nor do his scientific contemporaries if the truth be known.

 

TBH he just annoys me a bit - so I delight in pointing out that he's offering nothing concrete/helpful/different  .... it's all hollow razzmatazz.

 

He's famous not for his work - he's famous cos he's disabled

Heaven help us if you ever hate someone 

Saint posted:

Nor do his scientific contemporaries if the truth be known.

 

TBH he just annoys me a bit - so I delight in pointing out that he's offering nothing concrete/helpful/different  .... it's all hollow razzmatazz.

 

He's famous not for his work - he's famous cos he's disabled

Yogi19 posted:

Saint posted:

Nor do his scientific contemporaries if the truth be known.

 

TBH he just annoys me a bit - so I delight in pointing out that he's offering nothing concrete/helpful/different  .... it's all hollow razzmatazz.

 

He's famous not for his work - he's famous cos he's disabled

Heaven help us if you ever hate someone 

I never write in anger y'know

I'm giggling as I'm writing it LOL

Yogi19 posted:

Saint posted:

Nor do his scientific contemporaries if the truth be known.

 

TBH he just annoys me a bit - so I delight in pointing out that he's offering nothing concrete/helpful/different  .... it's all hollow razzmatazz.

 

He's famous not for his work - he's famous cos he's disabled

Heaven help us if you ever hate someone 

Saint posted:

Yogi19 posted:

Saint posted:

Nor do his scientific contemporaries if the truth be known.

 

TBH he just annoys me a bit - so I delight in pointing out that he's offering nothing concrete/helpful/different  .... it's all hollow razzmatazz.

 

He's famous not for his work - he's famous cos he's disabled

Heaven help us if you ever hate someone 

I never write in anger y'know

I'm giggling as I'm writing it LOL

I know that, Sainty. 

He's at it again.

If you got little left and no where to go what do you do? He's exhausted all his scientific knowledge and given over to predictions and guess-work.

So you do a Reggie Perrin.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem...replaced-puppet.html

A comment from a DM reader,

"What a load of rubbish and anyway he's not that clever I asked him space questions during a power cut one night. Not a word."

Saint posted:

A comment from a DM reader,

"What a load of rubbish and anyway he's not that clever I asked him space questions during a power cut one night. Not a word."